0
   

Teacher vs Researcher

 
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2021 07:49 am
@Jasper10,
I’m not that interested in what wiki think….or don’t think.

Leave them to it.
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2021 07:55 am
@Jasper10,
Your logic just built on your mind. Then you try to regulate science with your mind / require nature to cater to your mind. Got it? That’s why you created such thing as “anti gravity”, “white hole”, etc.

Science is not a simple logic as yours. Science is not simply toggle toggle all day. Science is a very complicated / detailed method to solve specific problems.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2021 08:07 am
@htam9876,
If you can find a single thing wrong with my logic output possibilities of 0,0..0,1..1,0..1,1 when applied to good and bad then please point it out.

0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2021 08:30 am
@htam9876,
My logic output possibilities are sound and cater for all belief systems.…they bring you to the BUBBLE….Heaven and Earth having passed away.

If you utilise the full logic output possibilities then your equations will ultimately bring you to the same conclusion…it’s only a matter of time.

htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2021 02:20 pm
@Jasper10,
You talk the 4 – off logic all day, but you don’t know how to utilize it in the correct way in science. You put the FULCRUM on your mind rather than on nature. Clear?

Next, piggy spends a bit more time to illustrate how to utilize it. Take the story of the father pig – little piggy in the previous page for example again:
The natural fact is: the father pig is a good swimmer while the little piggy is a bad swimmer.
A “prisoner of consciousness” might consider that “the father pig is a good swimmer, then, the little piggy should be a good swimmer too”. (Bad is good or say good is bad. Consciousness works.)
A guy who is AWARE might think that “the father pig is a good swimmer, but the little piggy should not necessary be a good swimmer too.” He tried to find out the truth and says that “the father pig is a good swimmer while the little piggy is a bad swimmer”. (Good is good, bad is bad. The FULCRUM is built on natural fact of the PRESENCE - SELF.)

So, if a guy assumes “a released photon has wave characteristic, then, all micro particles should have wave characteristic too”, he is obviously a “prisoner of consciousness”.

(Just sit there and toggle toggle 0110 all day, the plane will be able to fly into the blue sky. Haha…People need to learn Aero – Dynamics. There is merely 0110 in the book? haha )
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2021 10:53 pm
@htam9876,
I relate the FULCRUM to my mind and nature.All sciences are interconnected.

PRESENCE remains if everything else disappears.PRESENCE is not influenced by “toggling”

As I have already said it’s not about black holes/white holes and singularities anymore.

It’s about the overall system that precedes them and creates them.



0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2021 11:00 pm
@htam9876,
Remember the matchstick man story I told you.Well PRESENCE relates to STILL consciousness.MANUAL and AUTOPILOT relate to toggling consciousness.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2021 11:50 pm
@Jasper10,
The toggling consciousness states of mind:

Autopilot Autopilot
Autopilot Manual
Manual Autopilot
Manual Manual
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2021 03:15 am
@Jasper10,
Piggy will try to forget most of your repeated / endless / useless toggle toggle, auto pilot / manual pure psychological things. They have wasted piggy much time to read. They are boring. No more please. Thanks. haha
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2021 03:18 am
Fundamental natural relation, touchy and feely:

Assume we only know the static internal energy of a rabbit is E0 = m0c². The question here is what’s its dynamic internal energy when it bounces ahead?

In science, such question seems too odd. We can’t be “sure enough” that it’s just E = mc² by intuition. (At least the conception of dynamic / relativistic mass remains “confusing” in “standard” theory nowadays.)

In philosophy, we can resort to the PRESENCE - SELF principle. Hereby we can consider the energy – mass relation is a SELF, it would not change (its form) following movement. (Namely, the energy – mass relation is a fundamental natural relation. The fundamental natural relation is inherent property of matter reflects the most basic natural rule and would not change / disappear following movement. It’s the affair in the independent PRESENCE – SELF system.) So, we have a theoretical reason to say that the dynamic internal energy of that rabbit is E = mc² (here m is dynamic / relativistic mass).
In another hand, it demonstrates the dynamic / relativistic mass is reasonable. The dynamic internal energy equation E = mc². E is a scalar without direction. So, the dynamic / relativistic mass m is also without direction. No “confusing” of the so called what “transverse and longitudinal mass”.

A following question: what’s the kinematic energy of that rabbit? In this dynamic physical environment, no other physical factor such as gravity is concerned, and there is a balance of mc² - m0c². So, in logic, it’s obvious the kinematic energy of that rabbit. Namely, Ek = mc² - m0c².
Actually Einstein derived the above equation once upon a time with mathematical – physical method. It’s just the relativistic kinematic energy equation.

Philosophy vs science, no contradiction.

(In previous post, piggy dubbed the internal energy E as “SELF”. Now accurately speaking, it’s a part of the SELF “energy – mass relation”.)

Liqiang Chen
陈力强
August 2, 2021
给他江门地方黑恶势力钟永康集团及新会一中九一四班谁谁一个超文革赛阎王光荣称号快快全世界全宇宙打靶啦。当今时代,全世界没有什么人能够值得如此殊荣。呵呵
Piggy believes that except the First Law of Cosmos which created by the First Order (the local dark lords of the Jiangmen city and who who of the Class 914 of the No1. Middle School of Xinhui always try every means to grind piggy down) never changes, history is ever developing.
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2021 11:06 am
@htam9876,
Ha Ha …at least the concept of “toggling” has sunk in and hopefully will be more widely accepted in scientific reasonings/equations also PRESENCE and SELF …”Prisoner of Consciousness” are new terminologies that can be utilised and more fully understood.

In addition to the above ….at least the concept of FULCRUM is now on the radar in the new era of science.AT LAST!!

Autopilot and Manual are related to “toggling” + and - hence SELF moves between the two.

The new consciousness state is the STILL consciousness so clearly does not involve movement (momentum).SELF can rest.

SELF has now learnt CONTROL.

The FULCRUM involves the cancelling out of “toggling” equations.

The BUBBLE concept is interesting and is the way forward….I take it that you have not understood this concept fully philosophically…..I have to say it is a bit of a eureka moment when realised.

Experience is everything………

Bored? I’m sure philosophy will sort that problem out…..Ha Ha….






Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2021 11:56 am
@Jasper10,
The thing is htam9876 you still don’t quite get it…. for all you complicated equations mine still explain things best both philosophically and scientifically…..

Concentrate on the mysterious output associated with 0,0…1,1 …because if there is a difference between 0 and 1 then this changes everything at the philosophical level…..Why? well because presently most modern day science and philosophy HOPES a 0 and 1 are the same.

You see when the principle of 0,0..0,1..1,0…1,1 logic output possibilities is PROVEN to be the the general template then 0,0…1,1 logic has to be taken as seriously as 0,1…1,0 logic…which presently is not the case.


htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2021 03:54 pm
@Jasper10,
Piggy is busy digging a hole under the fence and has no spare time to take a glimpse of what you post here. Sorry. No sure whether they are toggle toggle 0110 autopilot manual again? Oh Lord, dizzy…haha
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2021 03:57 pm
Watch it in counter way, from Einstein’s energy - mass equation E = mc² or E0 = m0c²:
It hints “the fundamental natural relation is inherent property of matter reflects the most basic natural rule and would not change / disappear following movement”.

Actually, Einstein was the first guy to touch the FULCRUM.
But no evidence can show that he was AWARE of the FULCRUM (the independent PRESENCE – SELF system) over head, perhaps due to the limitation of era.

给他江门地方黑恶势力钟永康集团及新会一中九一四班谁谁一个超文革赛阎王光荣称号快快全世界全宇宙打靶啦。当今时代,全世界没有什么人能够值得如此殊荣。呵呵
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2021 10:56 pm
@htam9876,
The MYSTERIOUS output (or should I say not so mysterious output any more) of 0,0..1,1 logic output possibilities is PRESENCE…

Bored???…Ha Ha….
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Aug, 2021 06:32 pm
@Jasper10,
PRESENCE? Bounce…Sounds good thing.
But piggy (0,0) can only PRESENCE in the local Jiangmen city and be a third – rated citizen waiting to die, while the First Order (1,1) can PRESENCE everywhere in this cosmos and be in CONTROL.


Bored too…Ha Ha….
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Aug, 2021 11:19 pm
@htam9876,
SELF, if AWARE can go up to PRESENCE any time it wishes.SELF is no longer a “prisoner of consciousness.”.PRESENCE is STILL and everywhere and remains even after all matter has disappeared.As SELF is no longer constrained it can remain with PRESENCE when matter disappears and the “toggling” ceases.This would certainly confirm the STILL consciousness state that’s for sure.

I’m intrigued by the statement in Matthew 24;35…..Heaven and earth disappears but the word remains….ummmmm?

Heaven and earth would certainly need to pass away for the “toggling” to cease and for the simple and complicated “toggling” equations to no longer apply.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2021 12:01 am
@Jasper10,
High five!
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2021 06:58 am
@Jasper10,
There are two types of reasoning/thinking at the base level:

The first type of reasoning/thinking ultimately claims 0 is 1...1 is 0 and that these logic outputs are valid, arguing that 0 is 0 and 1 is 1 reasoning/thinking has no definitive proof to make such a claim.

The second type of reasoning/thinking ultimately claims 0 is 0 and 1 is 1 and that these logic outputs are valid,arguing that 0 is 1 and 1 is 0 reasoning /thinking has no definitive proof to make such a claim.

It could be argued that...

0 is 1 and 1 is 0 reasoning/thinking cancels out.

and that...

0 is 0 and 1 is 1 reasoning/thinking does not cancel out.

The question is ......Why is modern day science so reluctant to explore why 0 is 0 and 1 is 1 logic DOES NOT cancel out?

Logic states that this reluctance can only be down to a fundamental starting BELIEF system.

Logic doesn't LIE.





htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Aug, 2021 02:27 pm
@Jasper10,
Piggy really doesn’t know when the First Order would decide to shout “execute”, and then, piggy will disappear in this cosmos entirely.
Piggy is busy digging the hole under the fence and has no spare time to take a glimpse at what you post here. Not sure whether 0,0..0,1..1,0..1,1, AWARE, UNAWARE toggle again?
Oh Lord, what’s the usage…Good eating?

Why piggy believes the First Order would control this cosmos? They emphasize on things substantial in this society: money, resource, power, authority, position, means, ability, force, organization, plan, conspiracy, definition, effect, practice, etc…
Cabals ever win.
High four!
https://physicshelpforum.com/data/attachments/2/2105-9568f3094d7c72c457d5fe0cf9662b5a.jpg

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 09/28/2021 at 05:30:23