@Glennn,
There has been some questioning of the amount of Palestinians killed because the figures are announced by a Hamas controlled health authority.
I personally don't have any problem accepting the figures, the UN doesn't have a problem with them so neither do I.
And neither do you by the looks of things, you must accepted those figures because the UN said they were OK.
One of the first threads you started was ostensibly about crtical thinking and free speech but it was a thread dismissing the extent of the Holocaust, with you questioning the efficacy of Zyclon B.
Now those figure are far less contentious than the ones in Gaza, it happened a long time ago, thousands of historians, archivists and other scholars have looked at the figures and reached an overall conclusion which is only questioned by extremists.
I really can't see the point in any of this, it just seems nasty. Say for sake of argument the figures are wrong and only half the amount of people perished in the Holocaust as stated it wouldn't be any less of a crime. Something that enormous and systematic wouldn't be made any less evil by Nazi ineficiency.
And all the Nazi apologists, who try to muddy the waters by using terms like critical thinking and free speech, have, is the claim that the Nazi death machine wasn't as efficient as previously claimed.
That's like saying Jack the Ripper wasn't all bad because he failed to murder other prostitutes whose narrow escapes weren't reported.
That's your "critical thinking".