13
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
InfraBlue
 
  3  
Reply Wed 26 Oct, 2022 04:51 pm
@Builder,
According to Zuckerberg the FBI merely warned him about disinformation.

Quote:
The FBI basically came to us, some folks on our team, [saying,] ‘Hey just so you know, you should be on high alert. . . we thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election. . .we have it on notice that basically there’s about to be some kind of dump similar to that so just be vigilant.
. . .
Hey, look, if the FBI — which I still view as a legitimate institution in this country, it’s a very professional law enforcement — they come to us and tell us we need to be on guard about something, I want to take that seriously.


We'll see where this lawsuit goes.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Wed 26 Oct, 2022 05:21 pm
@Builder,
The case IS in Federal Court. So the freak what???

What you and your RW girlfriend opine on hasn't a thing to with the case.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Wed 26 Oct, 2022 05:23 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Yep. He sure did. And then dodged the problems with her opinions pieces.
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Oct, 2022 05:27 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:

Yep. He sure did. And then dodged the problems with her opinions pieces.


You are talking about Hightor?
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 26 Oct, 2022 06:23 pm
For those of you who hated the seeming temporary rise of lefty Sanders populism—your day has come. The progressive movement is most assuredly dead, and its corpse is being dragged around still today in the media.

Though Ms Jayapal has her fingers still clutching the murder weapon, she was the hired killer.

This to me is more evidence that the war in Ukraine was desired US policy. Elected progressives were recently bullied into seeking a peaceful resolution for the war in Ukraine by groups of progressive voters and activists.

So, the ‘progressive caucus’ drafted a letter to Biden, challenging him to seek a peaceful solution to the conflict. Seemed like a small, obvious gesture by progressives. Who wouldn’t want a peaceful solution??

Democrats. That’s who. Rank and file democrats raised such an attack against progressives for asking for a peaceful solution, that the leader of the ‘progressive caucus’ apologized for suggesting peace and blamed staff for accidentally sending and releasing the letter.

Amaze balls.

We no longer have anything resembling a progressive caucus.

Wtf? Have they locked Bernie in a dungeon somewhere? He’s oddly quiet.

https://www.newsweek.com/house-progressive-caucus-rescinds-ukraine-letter-lack-vetting-1754641?amp=1

Republicans say they’ll put an end to the war by stopping its funding. Progressives were accused of aiding Republicans by asking for peace.

This is not a good look.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 26 Oct, 2022 06:37 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
You addressed that post of georgeob1 which referred to a response to his post where he opines about those things.

Yes, but that response to georgeob1's post did not address any of georgeob1's points.

Georgeob1 questioned the point of the response. And my reply to georgeob1 was in relation to the point of the response.

By the time I posted, georgeob1's points were not being discussed. Instead the discussion was about the weird response to his post that failed to address any of his points.
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Wed 26 Oct, 2022 07:29 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:
So, the 'progressive caucus' drafted a letter to Biden, challenging him to seek a peaceful solution to the conflict. Seemed like a small, obvious gesture by progressives. Who wouldn't want a peaceful solution??
Democrats. That's who. Rank and file democrats raised such an attack against progressives for asking for a peaceful solution, that the leader of the 'progressive caucus' apologized for suggesting peace and blamed staff for accidentally sending and releasing the letter.

NATO really screwed up when they ruthlessly bombed Serbia and then stole Kosovo from them a few years later.

Now they really don't have much standing to complain when Russia does the same thing to countries like Georgia and Ukraine.

Hopefully this won't lead to a nuclear war. But it might.
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 02:32 am
Quote:
The administration has been continuing its push to demonstrate that it is working for ordinary Americans. Last month, President Joe Biden asked all agencies to find ways to cut “junk fees,” the hidden fees, charges, and add-ons that hit consumers on everything from airline and concert tickets, to hotels, to banking services and cable bills. These include the “service fees” on concert tickets, “family seating fees” on airlines, “termination fees,” and so on, and they account for tens of billions of dollars a year of revenue for corporations.

Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) warned banks that surprise overdraft fees and depositor fees for customers who deposit a check that bounces are “likely unfair and unlawful under existing law.” The CFPB is also looking into credit card fees. The Federal Trade Commission has started a rule-making process that addresses surprise fees for event ticketing, hotels, funeral homes, and so on; earlier this year, it brought actions against junk fees in the auto industry that are awaiting finalization.

The White House noted that while there is nothing wrong with a company charging reasonable add-on fees for additional products or services, junk fees designed to confuse consumers or lock in advantageous pricing in favor of the seller hurt businesses by making it hard for consumers to compare real prices or by locking them into contracts so they can’t move to a different provider.

Today, Biden reminded reporters that the price of gasoline is still falling and noted that getting rid of junk fees will save American consumers more than $1 billion a year.

In related news, a panel of three judges, all appointed by Trump, recently declared unconstitutional the system that funds the CFPB.

Also in related news: whitehouse.gov, which is where you go to read White House press releases, has a Halloween bat flying around the White House on the medallion at the top of the page (which was a nice surprise when I finally noticed it as I was reading about the not-necessarily-wildly-exciting world of junk fees).

President Biden and Israeli president Isaac Herzog met today, six days before the Israeli election and a day before Israeli and Lebanese officials are scheduled to sign a historic maritime boundary agreement, brokered by Special Presidential Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment Amos Hochstein. This was Herzog’s first private meeting with Biden, and both presidents reiterated their mutual support.

Herzog is widely perceived to be a moderate, while the return to power of right-wing former leader Benjamin Netanyahu, who openly railed against Democrats during his tenure, would be expected to cause friction with U.S. Democrats. On Tuesday, House speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) invited Herzog to deliver a speech to a joint session of Congress next year to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the founding of the modern Israeli state. Pelosi and Schumer said the invitation came as well from House minority leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), should they be in control of their respective houses at that time.

Herzog told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that he was “extremely pleased” that Americans had rejected the antisemitism of rapper and clothing designer Ye (formerly known as Kanye West). Multiple outlets reported that today Ye showed up uninvited and unannounced at Skechers Los Angeles headquarters to find a new home for his signature sneakers after being dropped by Adidas, but was escorted from the building.

Today, attorneys for former President Trump accepted service of the subpoena from the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol. The subpoena requires Trump to provide documents by November 4 and to testify by November 14.

Meanwhile, Arizona Republican Party chair Kelli Ward has asked the Supreme Court to block a subpoena from the January 6 committee for her phone records during the time she served as a fake elector to override the Arizona voters and over the period of January 6, 2021. Justice Elena Kagan has temporarily blocked enforcement of the subpoena so the full court can determine how to proceed.

Trump’s next legal move is unclear, but his political moves seem designed to scuttle the aspirations of his rivals. He announced today that he will be in Miami on November 6, holding a rally with Senator Marco Rubio to boost Rubio’s reelection campaign. Notably absent from the announcement was Florida governor Ron DeSantis. DeSantis’s people were angry at DeSantis’s exclusion, not least because Trump’s appearance at a rally in Florida two days before the election will take all the oxygen out of that day for DeSantis.

A Republican consultant told Politico’s Matt Dixon and Gary Fineout: “You’ve got the Sunday before Election Day totally hijacked by Trump parachuting in on Trump Force One taking up the whole day….No Republican could go to a DeSantis event that day. None. And DeSantis won’t be here? This is big.”

hcr
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 02:43 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
NATO really screwed up when they ruthlessly bombed Serbia and then stole Kosovo from them a few years later.

In cases like this, how much attention should be paid to the wishes of the inhabitants of the disputed land? Ninety per cent of Kosovites are Albanian.
Builder
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 03:11 am
@hightor,
Quote:
how much attention should be paid to the wishes of the inhabitants of the disputed land


Who disputed the lands of Libya, or Iraq, or Iran, or many other nations that the US destroyed with their ubiquitous expansionist policies?

Go to bed, hitor.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 03:28 am
The West's collective failure in Bosnia meant many young Muslim men became more radicalised, and can be blamed in part for the terrorist attacks on 9/11.

Inaction also has consequences.
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 03:37 am
@Builder,
Do you really believe that those military operations were attempting to incorporate those countries into the United States of America? I'm not defending anyone's involvement in the conflict but I don't see how it compares to the movement for independence in Kosovo.
Wikipedia wrote:
American involvement in the Libyan Civil War initially consisted of diplomatic initiatives and sanctions. This was followed by the implementation of the UN-mandated no-fly zone, the development of diplomatic relations with the rebels as well as humanitarian aid, bombing missions to destroy Gaddafi's military capabilities, and diplomatic assistance to the rebels.

In March 2011, five United States Air Force bombers (three B-2s and two B-1Bs) dropped bombs on at least 100 targets in Libya.

In June 2011, bombers thought to be from France killed nine civilians in Libya, including two toddlers.

Libya did not develop a central government after the military involvement.

Libyan rebels had consistently told American government officials that they did not want overt foreign military assistance in toppling Gaddafi. Instead, covert military assistance was used (including arms shipments to opposition). The plan following Gaddafi's death was to immediately begin flowing humanitarian assistance to eastern Libya and later western Libya, as the symbolism would be critically important. US sources stressed it as important that they would "not allow Turkey, Italy and others to steal a march on it".
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 04:38 am
@Builder,
Builder wrote:
Who disputed the lands of Libya, or Iraq, or Iran, or many other nations that the US destroyed with their ubiquitous expansionist policies?
When you look at the history of those countries, their lands have been disputed as long as there is a (written) history. For instance, even Marmarica (Libya Inferior) and Cyrenaica (Libya Superior) are less than the what was (called) Libya originally; Mesopotamia was a lot larger than Iraq; the Medes and Achaemenid Empire ... .

These "ubiquitous expansionist policies" could have started with the Barbary Wars. But in this case, you should not single out Sweden and the Kingdom of Sicily.
On the other hand, wars between the Barbarian states and European naval powers already existed in the 17th and 18th centuries and continued to exist for some years after the two military actions mentioned above.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 04:44 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
In cases like this, how much attention should be paid to the wishes of the inhabitants of the disputed land? Ninety per cent of Kosovites are Albanian.

That is the same argument that Russia is using to carve territory from Ukraine and Georgia. We should not have given them this precedent.

There is a general principle in international law that it is illegal to change a nation's borders by force. And Serbia did not agree to their borders being changed.


hightor wrote:
Ninety per cent of Kosovites are Albanian.

Most people in North Kosovo are Serbian and wanted to leave Kosovo so that they could remain with Serbia. And there is an easy and natural border between North Kosovo and Kosovo.

But just to rub salt in Serbian wounds, at the same time that we disregarded international law by taking Kosovo from Serbia, we told the Serbs in North Kosovo that this same international law would not allow them to leave Kosovo.

NATO's behavior towards Serbia was really outrageous, and it undermined NATO's credibility to now complain about Russia's bad behavior in Georgia and Ukraine.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 04:48 am
@Builder,
Builder wrote:
Who disputed the lands of Libya, or Iraq, or Iran, or many other nations that the US destroyed with their ubiquitous expansionist policies?

Libya was justice for the victims of Pan Am 103.

We left Iraq a democracy.

We have not toppled Iran's dictatorship unfortunately.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 04:51 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
The West's collective failure in Bosnia meant many young Muslim men became more radicalised, and can be blamed in part for the terrorist attacks on 9/11.
Inaction also has consequences.

I don't see our failure in Bosnia. We should have acted sooner, but we did act to end the war there.

I also don't see the connection to 9/11. What had bin Ladn so upset was American troops in Saudi Arabia.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  5  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 05:42 am
@McGentrix,
No. If you follow the discussion you'll see that Builder used an article written by Miranda Devine to make his case. It was then pointed out to him that Devine had also defended Cardinal Pell against charges of pedophilia – which is ironic considering Builder's obsession with the crime. Builder dodged an explanation after this information was brought up. Now you know.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  2  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 06:53 am
This is what is passing for important “breaking news” lately…
It’s being reported that Trump’s lawyers have agreed to accept service of the congressional subpoenas. Not that Trump is going to cooperate. Not that a date has been set for his testimony under oath. No, nothing like that.

Just that his ******* lawyers are being served the subpoenas, and that they “agree to accept” them.

Whoop de ******* do.

Have y’all woke up yet to the fact that NOTHING is going to happen to Trump?
hightor
 
  5  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 07:28 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
That is the same argument that Russia is using to carve territory from Ukraine and Georgia.

Which argument? Recognizing the political desire of the inhabitants or appropriating their land based on their ethnicity?
revelette1
 
  4  
Reply Thu 27 Oct, 2022 11:17 am
@snood,
I agree, they are kind of running out the clock. I still don't think the hearing itself was a waste of time, but I think they should have left off the subpoena thing.

It might still happen with DOJ. You never know. There is a higher threshold from what I only have way understood when it comes to what prosecutors can actually legally charge and take to court.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.65 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 12:26:53