13
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
BillW
 
  4  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2022 04:33 pm
IMHO, Merrick Garland is going after hanging fruit on a fast track (I love double metaphors 😁). To explain, Trump was told to return all official documents (od) he had in his possession.

The DOJ had determined that he still had ods in his possession, including documents so secret that a person with Top Secret clearance could not look at the documents and there can't even be a broad explanation/descriltion of what the documents cover. This is now not only a belief he had the ods, but is proven!

Secondly, this is reasonably believed to be a fast track through the court system. This appears at first glance to be a prima facie case in favor of the prosecution.

These two things added together adds fast and fact together to get a felony hung on Trump before the election, therefore making him ineligible to run for President!
Mame
 
  3  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2022 04:35 pm
@BillW,
He is such a slime! He needs to be taken down or out. ASAP.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2022 11:28 pm
It is a political truism that the United States is deeply divided politically. But with the home invasion, I think the polarisation of the country has reached a new and dangerous level.

Which I really can't understand.
Because in the light of day, it is very unlikely that Trump was the victim of a partisan plot:
- it was Trump himself who chose acting FBI Director Christopher Wray - a Yale graduate who was appointed head of the Justice Department's Criminal Division by Republican President George W. Bush in 2003 and who can hardly be said to be a left-wing activist,
- and the house search in Mar-a-Largo was only possible because a judge had given permission beforehand.



Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2022 11:34 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
"I will support a complete dismantling and elimination of the democrat brown shirts known as the FBI." Rep. Paul Gossar wrote on twitter.

Just to set the record straight: the thugs of the NSDAP, the SA (aka 'brown shirts'), were active when the NSDAP was an opposition party.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2022 03:28 am
Quote:
This afternoon, Representative Scott Perry (R-PA) said the FBI has confiscated his phone after presenting him with a search warrant.

Perry was deeply involved in the attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election. He connected former president Trump with Jeffrey Clark, the environmental lawyer for the Department of Justice (DOJ) who supported Trump’s claims and who would have become acting attorney general if the leadership of the DOJ hadn’t threatened to resign as a group if Trump appointed him. Cassidy Hutchinson, former top aide to Trump’s White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, told the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol that Meadows burned papers after a meeting with Perry.

The DOJ searched Clark’s home in June. On the same day, it seized the phone of John Eastman, the author of the memo laying out a plan for then–vice president Mike Pence to refuse to count presidential electors for Democratic candidate Joe Biden and thus throw the election to Trump.

Eastman sued to get his phone back and to force the government to destroy any information agents had taken from it; the Department of Justice says the phone was obtained legally and that purging it would be “unprecedented” and “would cause substantial detriment to the investigation, as well as seriously impede any grand jury’s use of the seized material in a future charging decision.” A court hearing on the matter is scheduled for early September.

Trump and his supporters have spent the day complaining bitterly about yesterday’s search of Mar-a-Lago by the FBI, painting it an illegal “witch hunt” and threatening to launch a “revolution” over it. A search warrant requires a judge to sign off on the idea that there is probable cause to believe a crime has been committed and that a search will provide evidence of that crime. While the FBI cannot release the search warrant, Trump has a copy of it and could release it if he wanted to.

Legal analyst Andrew Weissmann, who spent 20 years at the Department of Justice, pointed out on Twitter that the law requires the FBI to give Trump an inventory of what they found. If indeed he wants to claim the search was a witch hunt and he had no government property in his home, he should release the search inventory.

Kyle Cheney at Politico noted that on January 19, 2021, the day before he left office, Trump revoked the authority he had previously given and named seven new loyalists as his representatives to the National Archives with regard to his presidential records. They were Meadows; then–White House counsel Pat Cipollone; then–deputy White House counsel Patrick Philbin; lawyer John Eisenberg, who as legal advisor to the National Security Council tried to keep the story about Trump’s call to Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky under wraps; Scott Gast, also of the White House counsel’s office during Trump’s term; lawyer Michael Purpura; and lawyer Steven Engel, who argued that Congress could not subpoena White House advisors.

Meanwhile, Sadie Gurman, Alex Leary, and Aruna Viswanatha of the Wall Street Journal reported today that the Mar-a-Lago search came out of the concern of federal agents that Trump had not returned all the classified documents he took from the White House. In January of this year, the National Archives and Records Administration retrieved 15 boxes of material, including records that had been torn into pieces. Yesterday, federal officials retrieved about 10 more boxes.

Tonight, Representative Jim Banks (R-IN) told Fox News Channel personality Laura Ingraham that 12 Republican members of the House of Representatives met with Trump tonight, told him they stand with him, and urged him to run for president in 2024. They want to see Representative Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) as speaker of the house and Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH) as chair of the Judiciary Committee.

Three judges from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals today upheld a ruling from a lower court that said the House Ways and Means Committee can see Trump’s tax returns. The committee began the journey to look at them back in 2019. Trump can appeal to the full bench or to the Supreme Court. The House Ways and Means Committee said it expects “to receive the requested tax returns and audit files immediately.”

Today, President Biden signed the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 into law. The new measure will provide $52.7 billion in subsidies to semiconductor production in the U.S. and invest in science and technology. Biden noted that with signing of the bill into law, Micron would announce a $40 billion investment in new chip-manufacturing facilities in the United States through the end of the decade, and GlobalFoundries and Qualcomm “announced yesterday a $4 billion partnership to produce chips in the U.S. that would otherwise have gone overseas.”

“Fundamental change is taking place today—politically, economically, and technologically—change that can either strengthen our sense of control and security, of dignity and pride in our lives, in our nation; or—or change that weakens us so that people are left behind, causing them to question whether or not the very institutions—our economy, our democracy itself — can still deliver for them, for everybody,” Biden said.

Pleased to be signing the bill that invests in our technological future into law, Biden said: “[D]ecades from now, people are going to look back at this week, with all we’ve passed and all we’ve moved on, that we met the moment at this inflection point in history—a moment when we bet on ourselves, believed in ourselves, and recaptured the story, the spirit, and the soul of this nation. We are the United States of America, a singular place of possibilities…. I promise you, we’re leading the world again for the next decades.”

hcr
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2022 08:16 am
Well, I guess the GOP found their faux outrage and villains to reunite them when it seemed for a while things were looking a bit brighter for Dems for a brief moment.

The question is will the public be stupid again and fall for it all over again? It is all just so tiresome. I mean, everyone knows Trump has a history of ignoring subpoenas and ripping up and flushing documents in the toilets. The outrage should have been all along about Trump removing presidential documents, classified or otherwise, from the White House to his residence.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2022 08:55 am
"You see the mob takes the Fifth," Trump famously said. "If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?"

Trump Takes the Fifth Amendment in New York Deposition
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2022 09:00 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

"You see the mob takes the Fifth," Trump famously said. "If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?"

Trump Takes the Fifth Amendment in New York Deposition


Yup. He was correct.

We all know why he is taking the 5th. He is guilty as Hell.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2022 09:01 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

"You see the mob takes the Fifth," Trump famously said. "If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?"

Trump Takes the Fifth Amendment in New York Deposition


If his attorneys are competent...they will advise him never to say anything under oath. Perjury is a serious crime...and there is no way Trump will stand up to that test.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2022 10:23 am
'The base has lost its mind': Republicans fear 'another Jan. 6' after FBI raids Mar-a-Lago

House Republicans have been plotting investigations of Joe Biden and his family if they retake the majority this fall, but those plans have been complicated by the search warrant executed at Donald Trump's private residence.

The FBI searched Mar-a-Lago as part of an investigation into alleged mishandling of classified documents, and while GOP lawmakers have raced to Trump's defense and attacked the Department of Justice as unfairly partisan -- some Republicans expressed concern about the fallout among the conservative base, reported Politico.

“The base has lost its mind," said one senior House Republican. "If Trump decides to call them to arms, then I think he could get another Jan. 6."

Republicans have personalized the law enforcement move against Trump by suggesting the same actions could be taken against anyone -- which isn't inaccurate -- and some have seen that as an incitement to violence.

SOURCE:

https://www.rawstory.com/mar-a-lago-search-warrant-2657841029/


Ummm, my money is on the Democratic Republic. Give the President a Democratic Senate. Vote every election.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2022 12:20 pm
@Frank Apisa,

Trump’s refusal to answer questions in a civil case could help him in a parallel criminal investigation.
Quote:
Donald J. Trump’s decision not to respond to questions under oath about his business practices in an interview with the New York State attorney general’s office could forestall new avenues of inquiry in a parallel criminal investigation by the Manhattan district attorney.

For years, the district attorney’s office has been investigating whether Mr. Trump fraudulently inflated the value of his properties to gain loans and tax breaks, and prosecutors were presenting evidence to a grand jury in the case early this year. The district attorney’s criminal investigation covers much of the same ground as the civil inquiry being conducted by the attorney general’s office.

But the new Manhattan district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, who came into office on Jan. 1, and other prosecutors had developed concerns about the challenge of showing that Mr. Trump intended to break the law, a requirement for proving the charge that prosecutors had been considering, as The New York Times reported in March.

As a result, the grand jury presentation was suspended. Soon after, two senior prosecutors who had been leading the investigation left the office.

Mr. Bragg has said that the investigation is continuing, though he has not offered a clear sense of its direction.

Had Mr. Trump answered questions on Wednesday and stumbled, or unintentionally incriminated himself, it could have breathed new life into the criminal investigation. Mr. Bragg had said that the office would closely monitor the interview.

But the former president’s decision to invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination means his deposition will be of limited use to the district attorney’s office.

A misstep by Mr. Trump would have been a boon for Manhattan prosecutors, but it is unlikely that they were counting solely on the interview to change the course of their investigation. His refusal to speak, however, leaves the future of the Manhattan criminal inquiry uncertain.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  2  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2022 07:12 pm
Man, this is getting interesting. The FBI just delivered subpoenas to several GOP Pennsylvania lawmakers.

The rumor is that they are investigating Scott Perry’s efforts to overthrow the 2020 election.
glitterbag
 
  4  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2022 08:09 pm
@snood,
Gosh, and all they wanted was to overthrow the government so they can piss off the liberals.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  5  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2022 10:11 pm
I heard Hunter Biden watched the FBI raid on Trump from his laptop.
Builder
 
  -4  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2022 10:39 pm
@Wilso,
Quote:
I heard Hunter Biden watched the FBI raid on Trump from his laptop.


From his cell in Gitmo? It would be poetic justice, really.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2022 03:45 am
@Builder,
Well, now that we seem to have an informant who told the feds exactly where trump hid his illegaly removed documents, it looks like the occupant of the next celll in gitmo is gonna be trump, forget about hunter.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2022 08:16 am
Quote:
The raid on Mar-a-Lago was based largely on information from an FBI confidential human source, one who was able to identify what classified documents former President Trump was still hiding and even the location of those documents, two senior government officials told Newsweek.

The officials, who have direct knowledge of the FBI's deliberations and were granted anonymity in order to discuss sensitive matters, said the raid of Donald Trump's Florida residence was deliberately timed to occur when the former president was away.

FBI decision-makers in Washington and Miami thought that denying the former president a photo opportunity or a platform from which to grandstand (or to attempt to thwart the raid) would lower the profile of the event, says one of the sources, a senior Justice Department official who is a 30-year veteran of the FBI.

The effort to keep the raid low-key failed: instead, it prompted a furious response from GOP leaders and Trump supporters. "What a spectacular backfire," says the Justice official.

"I know that there is much speculation out there that this is political persecution, but it is really the best and the worst of the bureaucracy in action," the official says. "They wanted to punctuate the fact that this was a routine law enforcement action, stripped of any political overtones, and yet [they] got exactly the opposite."

Both senior government officials say the raid was scheduled with no political motive, the FBI solely intent on recovering highly classified documents that were illegally removed from the White House. Preparations to conduct such an operation began weeks ago, but in planning the date and time, the FBI Miami Field Office and Washington headquarters were focused on the former president's scheduled return to Florida from his residences in New York and New Jersey.

"They were seeking to avoid any media circus," says the second source, a senior intelligence official who was briefed on the investigation and the operation. "So even though everything made sense bureaucratically and the FBI feared that the documents might be destroyed, they also created the very firestorm they sought to avoid, in ignoring the fallout."

On Monday at about 10 a.m. EDT, two dozen FBI agents and technicians showed up at Donald Trump's Florida home to execute a search warrant to obtain any government-owned documents that might be in the possession of Trump but are required to be delivered to the Archives under the provisions of the 1978 Presidential Records Act. (In response to the Hillary Clinton email scandal, Trump himself signed a law in 2018 that made it a felony to remove and retain classified documents.)

The act establishes that presidential records are the property of the U.S. government and not a president's private property. Put in place after Watergate to avoid the abuses of the Nixon administration, the law imposes strict penalties for failure to comply. "Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined" $2,000, up to three years in prison or "shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States."

The act, and concerns about the illegal possession of classified "national defense information" are the basis for the search warrant, according to the two sources. The raid had nothing to do with the January 6 investigation or any other alleged wrongdoing by the former president.

The road to the raid began a year-and-a-half ago, when in the transition from the Trump administration to that of President Joe Biden, there were immediate questions raised by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) as to whether the presidential records turned over to the federal agency for historical preservation were complete or not.

In February, Archivist David Ferriero testified before Congress that his agency began talking with Trump's people right after they left office and that the Trump camp had already returned 15 boxes of documents to the Archives. Ferriero said that in those materials, the Archives discovered items "marked as classified national security information," unleashing further inquiries as to whether Trump continued to possess classified material.

The basic outlines of the facts surrounding this timeline have been confirmed by the former president. He has previously said that he was returning any official records to the Archives, labeling any confusion in the matter as "an ordinary and routine process to ensure the preservation of my legacy and in accordance with the Presidential Records Act." He also claimed the Archives "did not 'find' anything" in what he had already been returned, suggesting that there was nothing sensitive. He said the documents had inadvertently shipped to Florida during the six-hour transition period in which his belongings were moved.

According to the Justice Department source, the Archives saw things differently, believing that the former White House was stonewalling and continued to possess unauthorized material. Earlier this year, they asked the Justice Department to investigate.

In late April, the source says, a federal grand jury began deliberating whether there was a violation of the Presidential Records Act or whether President Trump unlawfully possessed national security information. Through the grand jury process, the National Archives provided federal prosecutors with copies of the documents received from former President Trump in January 2022. The grand jury concluded that there had been a violation of the law, according to the Justice Department source.

In the past week, the prosecutor in the case and local Assistant U.S. Attorney went to Florida magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart in West Palm Beach to seek approval for the search of Donald Trump's private residence. The affidavit to obtain the search warrant, the intelligence source says, contained abundant and persuasive detail that Trump continued to possess the relevant records in violation of federal law, and that investigators had sufficient information to prove that those records were located at Mar-a-Lago—including the detail that they were contained in a specific safe in a specific room.

"In order for the investigators to convince the Florida judge to approve such an unprecedented raid, the information had to be solid, which the FBI claimed," says the intelligence source.

According to experts familiar with FBI practices, Judge Reinhart reviewed the prosecutor's evidence and asked numerous questions about the sources and the urgency. The judge signed a search warrant allowing the FBI to look for relevant material and the FBI then planned the operation, wanting to conduct the raid while Trump was spending time at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey. A Secret Service source who spoke on background said the Secret Service director was given advance warning and was later told the specifics of the raid.

Because the Secret Service is still responsible for protecting the former president, his family, and his property, the FBI had to coordinate with the Secret Service to gain access to the grounds.

A convoy of unmarked black SUVs and a Ryder rental truck filled with about three dozen FBI special agents and technicians entered the gates in the early evening. Heavily armed Secret Service agents were also visibly present at the gates. The Palm Beach Police Department was also present at the scene.

The entire operation was conducted relatively stealthily. No FBI people were seen in their iconic blue windbreakers announcing the presence of the Bureau. And though local law enforcement was present, the Palm Beach Police Department was careful to tweet on Tuesday that it "was not aware of the existence of a search warrant nor did our department assist the FBI in the execution of a search warrant."

According to news reports, some 10-15 boxes of documents were removed from the premises. Donald Trump said in a statement that the FBI opened his personal safe as part of their search. Trump attorney Lindsey Halligan, who was present during the multi-hour search, says that the FBI targeted three rooms—a bedroom, an office and a storage room. That suggests that the FBI knew specifically where to look.


https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-informer-told-fbi-what-docs-trump-was-hiding-where-1732283
revelette1
 
  3  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2022 08:26 am
@revelette1,
Hillary Clinton promotes 'But Her Emails' merch after FBI search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  2  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2022 10:14 am

breaking:

an armed #MAGAmoron tried to get inside FBI field office in Dayton OH...

Rolling Eyes
Ragman
 
  2  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2022 10:34 am
@Region Philbis,
Someone with a death wish or passion to be in the news cycle for 5 minutes.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.17 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 02:00:23