25
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
NSFW (view)
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jul, 2021 10:42 pm
@snood,
Understood.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  4  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2021 05:49 am

https://iili.io/Ans3gV.jpg
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2021 08:11 am
One thing keeping Trumpism alive, people won't quit talking about him and giving him millions of dollars worth of free publicity. The same mistake that got him elected.
engineer
 
  2  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2021 08:28 am
@edgarblythe,
Nah, Trumpism is more that Trump. It is about the authoritarian impulse, privilege and the fear of losing it, rage against the other and those willing to stoke it for gain. Long after Trump is gone, Trumpism will remain just with different leaders.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2021 08:30 am
@engineer,
You are right except that the focus on him allows momentum for him if he actually does run again.
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2021 01:31 pm
So Ken Starr engaged, while married, in a sexual relationship with another woman. But his hypocrisy and deceits are actually much worse than just this matter. Read here
hightor
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2021 01:44 pm
@blatham,
“Let all the poison that lurks in the mud, hatch out.”
― Robert Graves, quote from I, Claudius
glitterbag
 
  2  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2021 01:54 pm
@blatham,
Ken Starr, phooey!!! I hope to never hear his name again, the sleazy bastarge. Yes, it's misspelled, I'm trying to cut back on the blue language.
hightor
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2021 02:17 pm
@edgarblythe,
Quote:
You are right except that the focus on him allows momentum for him if he actually does run again.

There is such a thing as overexposure, especially with someone as pathetically shallow as Trump. You never know if it will kick in, but when it does it's lethal.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2021 02:19 pm
@hightor,
Explain it to Hillary.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2021 02:24 pm
I don’t find any kind of vindication - finding out that the fool who ran the blowjob witch hunt on Clinton was not morally perfect.

I mean, would you see the witch hunt as a legitimate, good faith legal inquiry if it had been run by someone pure as the driven snow (also keeping in mind that no such person exists)?

I mean, even if Ken Starr had been a saint in matters of infidelity, that whole business of nailing Clinton for lying about a blowjob was still sleazy and lowdown.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2021 02:44 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

I don’t find any kind of vindication - finding out that the fool who ran the blowjob witch hunt on Clinton was not morally perfect.

I mean, would you see the witch hunt as a legitimate, good faith legal inquiry if it had been run by someone pure as the driven snow (also keeping in mind that no such person exists)?

I mean, even if Ken Starr had been a saint in matters of infidelity, that whole business of nailing Clinton for lying about a blowjob was still sleazy and lowdown.


AMEN!
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2021 02:45 pm
The Benghazi investigations crap was a purely political smear job. But it helped give many voters a worse impression of Clinton than they might have already had. Other Politicians, like Reagan and the 600 dead marines in Lebanon I think it was get scarcely a notice. My own criticisms of Hillary have never been based on Benghazi in any way shape or form.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2021 02:59 pm
@glitterbag,
That was an unfortunate choice of phrase.

Now I’ve got “No. 1 Super Guy” going through my head.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2021 04:46 pm
@hightor,
There's a perfect reference.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2021 04:49 pm
@snood,
Quote:
I mean, even if Ken Starr had been a saint in matters of infidelity, that whole business of nailing Clinton for lying about a blowjob was still sleazy and lowdown.
Sure. But this expose on him makes clear just how sleazy he is.
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2021 05:11 pm
@blatham,
But why is that relevant? If he was not a sleazoid, would that make the actions he’s known for any less sleazy?

Does the degree of the depths of his depravity or hypocrisy have any more relevance than tabloid fodder?
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2021 02:39 am
@snood,
Good grief. Lot's of people have affairs. "Depravity" is a bit strong.

Having an affair does not make him a hypocrite.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2021 02:40 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
But this expose on him makes clear just how sleazy he is.

In other words, not sleazy in any way at all.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 09/22/2021 at 03:47:23