Piggy doesn’t think that your “4 – off logic” (or say “absolute 2 – off logic” + “relativistic 2 – off logic”) is “word game”. But the fact is that nowadays seldom people can entirely understand the spirit of it.
Whether the pork is delicious or not is of course decided by a man’s subjectivity. First taste, he might feels delicious; takes more, he might dislike it for too fat. Such opinion itself is not wrong. The problem is that the man is not AWARE that such affair belongs to the category of “consciousness”. What’s wrong is the man misconsiders it represents the whole of science. He is “completely in the dark”. This case is a typical example of “prisoner of consciousness”.
The man ignores another part of science: the objectivity of PRESENCE and SELF. Talk about the simple example of spiral spring again: left handed is left handed; right handed is right handed. It would not change following a man’s subjectivity or different physical environment.
Employing theory in the category of “consciousness” to explain phenomenon in the category of “PRESENCE and SELF” is obvious “method inappropriate”. Those “prisoner of consciousness” never can be AWRAE of this.
Actually, the PRESENCE of pork is just the PRESENCE of pork. Why pork must be associated to a man’s taste? “Gangster’s logic”? haha
Your 4 – off logic as well as the PRESENCE – SELF principle is worthy of serious research, especially for those “prisoner of consciousness” who is lack of AWARENESS.
Thank you for your philosophical principles, now piggy is sitting on the FULCRUM and STILL there, waiting for that “eccentric” rabbit Dandan to climb up too. Haha