0

# Cosmos vs us

Jasper10

1
Thu 31 Dec, 2020 02:16 am
@htam9876,
Hey... I am sorry you are in a dark place...many people can relate to exactly where you are...so you are not alone.Try meditation and focus on yourself for once.One needs to quiet/still the mind or it will keep processing all the time and keep feeding information to you because it thinks that’s what you want.One needs to train the mind to do what you want of it.Hope this make sense.Try bringing yourself into the moment more and more.You are stuck in autopilot all the time.
0 Replies

htam9876

1
Wed 6 Jan, 2021 02:34 am
Thanks guys. Thanks a2k. Thanks G*. Piggy is not alone.
…………………………….
Piggy played the match stick game with my former classmates of middle schools ten years ago. Piggy gave a solution: just pick up stick C and pushes stick E outside and put stick C back to the original place.
In 2020, a what coffin box from what CN appeared in PHF USA, and piggy had to leave PHF, and the shape of PHF remains unchanged. Bounce…

0 Replies

htam9876

1
Wed 6 Jan, 2021 06:55 pm
The dynamic vs the gravitational vs the static, touchy and feely:

The mass – space equation L ∝ 1/ M come in first;
Next, the time – space equation △t ∝ 1 / L.
Then: △t ∝ M. This might be called the Mass – Time equation.
The mass – space equation from my physical model of elementary particle is r ∝ 1/ M;
The Mass – Time equation accompanies it is also △t ∝ M.
The internal energy E ∝ M, then:
L ∝ 1/ E, or r ∝ 1/ E, this can be called the Energy – Space equation;
And △t ∝ E, this can be called the Energy – Time equation

Hereby, X4 Theory formally employs mass or energy (internal energy) to control space and time. It’s applicable in all situations of the dynamic vs the gravitational vs the static.

The dynamic situation (put aside the case of the released photon temporarily):
When an elementary particle moves, the kinematic energy occurs and its internal energy E = m0c² + Ek. According to the Energy – Space equation L ∝ 1/ E, or r ∝ 1/ E, the increase of the internal energy E results in the contraction of the 3D physical space. According to the Energy – Time equation △t ∝ E, the increase of the internal energy E results in the inflation of time.

The gravitational situation:
When an elementary particle locates in gravitational field (relative to the infinite point), its gravitational energy is negative. Its internal energy E increases. According to the Energy – Space equation L ∝ 1/ E, or r ∝ 1/ E, the increase of the internal energy E results in the contraction of the 3D physical space. According to the Energy – Time equation △t ∝ E, the increase of the internal energy E results in the inflation of time.

The static situation:
“According to the mass – space equation r ∝1 / M, the rise of the increased mass of the proton results in the contraction of the radius of the proton in μ Hydrogen atom.” (For details , please see relevance in the thread “matter vs anti matter”). And according to the mass – time equation △t ∝ M, the rise of the increased mass of the proton results in the inflation of time of the proton in μ Hydrogen atom. There is no absolute time, even in situation of the static.

The cosmic environment situation:
The “mass – space equation” can transform into another form: L ∝ 1/ρ. The mass density of the cosmos now is much smaller than that of billions of years ago. According to the mass space equation L ∝ 1/ρ, the 3D physical space of the cosmos is much different than that of billions of years ago. And the mass – time equation can transform into another form: △t ∝ ρ. The criteria of time is dynamic in the evolution of cosmos.

At any historical juncture, guys who are willing to invert their habitual thought could become good players.
Liqiang Chen
Jan 6, 2021
Seems that it’s irrational for piggy to be controlled by the local dark lords of the Jiangmen city. What a joke it will be in 21st century. Piggy can’t surrender to them. That means piggy has no choice but die hard in CN. Bounce…

0 Replies

htam9876

1
Thu 14 Jan, 2021 06:21 pm
Supplementary stuff to the chapter “the dynamic vs the gravitational vs the static”:
(In the X4 Theory, the released photon is in a very special matter state and it must be treated in a special way.)

The dynamic situation:
Light speed is an invariable in different inertial frames. That means the kinematic energy of a released photon does not change in different inertial frames: Ek = Ek’. Also its internal energy does not change in different inertial frames: E = E’. According to Energy – Space equation, the 3D physical space does not change in different inertial frames; according to Energy – Time equation, the time does not change in different inertial frames: L = L’; △t = △t’.
So, L / △t = L’ / △t’. Namely c = c’. It means light speed is an invariable in different inertial frames. No contradiction.

The gravitational situation:
If a released photon travels from the ground to the top of the Pizza tower, its gravitational potential increases. And its internal energy decreases (note: its kinematic energy also decreases). According to Energy – Space equation, the 3D physical space inflates. Its wave length stretches. This point could be verified by the gravitational red shift phenomenon. According to Energy – Time equation, time contracts.
At this moment, piggy wants to talk a bit about the light speed in gravitational field. We had some discussions in this respect in PHF:
Piggy agrees that light speed does not change in gravitational field.
It demonstrates that the employment of velocity to control space – time is not sufficient enough. Energy / mass might be a better player.

The static situation:
In my physical model, the released photon is a section of electromagnetic wave, different matter state from other elementary particles (spherical electromagnetic wave). It can’t sit, and must travels in light speed c. So, there is no a static situation for the released photon.

The cosmic environment situation:
If the cosmos is expanding, the mass density of the cosmos now is much smaller than that of billions of years ago. According to the mass space equation L ∝ 1/ρ, the 3D physical space of the cosmos is much different than that of billions of years ago. That means when light from a remote galaxy reaches the Earth today, its wavelength has been stretched significantly. Piggy has talked about this point ahead.

Liqiang Chen
Jan 15, 2021

0 Replies

htam9876

1
Sun 17 Jan, 2021 06:30 pm
(Once upon a time, piggy asked a question in PHF: what’s the base of cosmos? One guy’s opinion was that it’s QFT. Piggy was very surprising. Why should it be a theory? Even you consider it’s a fluffy version of guinea pig, people could have something substantial left in cosmos.
Piggy’s humble opinion is that space – time, mass and energy is the base of cosmos / physics.
A good fundamental theory should be able to weave these basic elements.)

Time vs time, touchy and feely:
Perhaps “what’s time?” is one of the hot topics argued most on web. Piggy’s humble opinion is that the definition of time should reflect its basic physical property.

Piggy said in a post a head that:
““According to the mass – space equation r ∝1 / M, the rise of the increased mass of the proton results in the contraction of the radius of the proton in μ Hydrogen atom.” (For details , please see relevance in the thread “matter vs anti matter”). And according to the mass – time equation △t ∝ M, the rise of the increased mass of the proton results in the inflation of time of the proton in μ Hydrogen atom. There is no absolute time, even in situation of the static.”
It means time affiliates to matter. There is no absolute time, even in the same inertial frame. In traditional SR, time is transformed in different inertial frames. But actually, such inertial frames are built on specific objects. So, physically it’s time of that object inflates. (No matter it’s the replacement of a u particle results in the rise of the increased mass of the proton, or the movement does it, according to the mass – time equation △t ∝ M, the rise of the mass of the proton results in the inflation of time of the proton. Or say, it’s the rise of the internal energy of the proton results in the inflation of time of the proton (△t ∝ E). It’s not that there is a time flowing ahead like a river in an inertial frame.)
The gravitational situation is the same principle.

Time is controlled by internal energy of matter, so, time is the inherent property of matter.
Internal energy is wave characteristic, so, time is the pulse of everything in cosmos.
(This is time associated with 3D physical space)
Liqiang Chen
Jan 18, 2021
(The cruel and all around dark sanction / affliction of the local dark lords of the Jiangmen city over so many years has shortened piggy’s lifespan at least ten plus years. So, piggy’s pulse could stop at any time. Bounce…)

Albuquerque

1
Tue 19 Jan, 2021 10:25 pm
@htam9876,
Time is news.
Time is the measurement of the speed of difference.
Time is the rate at witch information is transferred and received.

...but of course Time as a property of Reality is timeless...
Spacetime as viewed from GR is a block with past present and future in a closed system as there is no "outside".

Nothingness is nothing. There is no outside.
Jasper10

1
Wed 20 Jan, 2021 03:18 am
@Albuquerque,
You hope.....
htam9876

1
Wed 20 Jan, 2021 06:31 pm
@Albuquerque,

As piggy said ahead: Perhaps “what’s time?” is one of the hot topics argued most on web. People can conjecture in any way.
“Time is news.
Time is the measurement of the speed of difference.
Time is the rate at witch information is transferred and received.”
They can not reflect the basic physical property of time (△t ∝ E).
…………………………
As piggy said ahead ahead ahead, Einstein just showed us the existence of internal energy. It’s piggy who illustrated what’s internal energy. Why? Einstein’s theory is in the category of Mass Point Dynamics. How can an abstract mass point contain true internal energy? That’s the limitation of theory. That’s why piggy suggested in the elephant thread that “this new era of physics (Structure of Elementary Particle as the supplement to the Mass Point Dynamics)”.

History is not standing wave but travelling wave.
0 Replies

htam9876

1
Wed 20 Jan, 2021 06:34 pm
@Jasper10,
Perhaps Albuquerque hopes that there will still be a time for piggy after the pig’s pulse stopped. Good will enough but that’s merely pipe dream. After the pig’s pulse stopped, time will no longer belongs to him, but belongs to the first order. Bounce.
Piggy found that many scientists hope that physics stands in 20th century for ever.
Albuquerque

1
Wed 20 Jan, 2021 06:40 pm
@htam9876,
..oh but no, nop, Piggy information is potential information and thus will never be lost...just like all combinations on a Rubik cube eventually in a cyclic model of the Universe Piggy will be back without memory that it was "here" before.
...hopefully in some of those fractal repeating patterns some small variations on Piggy's life will make Piggy more happy and less sad! I hope to meet a happier Piggy in this forum in the next Aeon in a trillion trillion trillion years or so!
Don't worry for the dead almost Infinity is one second. You die and you wake up again in a zip!

PS - Please just don't go kill yourself because of what I wrote eh!
htam9876

3
Wed 20 Jan, 2021 06:49 pm
@Albuquerque,
Piggy is very happy in a2k, because he got a lot of new friends here and is not alone.
Thank you guys.
0 Replies

Jasper10

1
Thu 21 Jan, 2021 03:41 am
@htam9876,
I think I understand what you mean and yes I agree to a point. Not sure what you mean by first order though?
htam9876

1
Thu 21 Jan, 2021 06:16 pm
@Jasper10,
The meaning of first order could be found in one of my post in the thread "turtel vs rabbit". haha
Piggy is preparing supplementray stuff to help better understanding and will post it here as soon as possible.
Dear guys, if you understand "time affiliates to matter / time is the inherent property of matter", you have entered the new era of physics.
Thank you. haha
0 Replies

htam9876

1
Fri 22 Jan, 2021 07:24 pm
Piggy hereby provides a bit more humble opinions for reference to those guys who are willing to touch the elephant in an alternative way.
Okay, this post is a bit odd.
First, again piggy invites guys to take a look at the what coffin box from what CN said in piggy’s thread in PHF.
If you think that piggy has been defeated by the what coffin box from what CN in PHF USA in 2020, please ignore what I am talking in this post. Thank you.
………………………………………
Supplementary stuff to the chapter “time vs time, touchy and feely”:
In general words, the internal energy is E = hγ, γ is the frequency of the circle kind standing wave (simplified model). It is also applicable to the released photon.
The Time - Energy equation is △t ∝ E. Then, △t ∝ γ. This could be called the Time – Frequency equation. It’s the equation accompanies the Space – Frequency equation r ∝ 1 / γ ahead.
If γ is the frequency of a specific and stable circle kind standing wave (simplified model) or released photon, we can make use a proportionate constant k. Then, the Time – Frequency equation could have a specific form: △t = k γ. In vivid imagination, it means time is the pulse of everything in cosmos.

If γ = 0, then, △t = 0. It means if there is nothing existing, there is no time.
If γ changes, then, △t changes too (the criterion of unit time changes).
Wave is ever travelling, no matter in a circle or in a straight line, the pulse is ever bumping, so, time is ever flowing ahead.
The proportionate constant k could be either positive value or negative value. For convenient sake, we use positive value. The frequency γ is positive value, so, △t should be positive value too. That’s to say the mathematical symbol “- t” is meaningless in physics.
We use a clock not to measure time but to simulate time or say to simulate the pulse: tick, tick and tick…the conception of time generates. We use one “tick” of the clock to simulate one “bump” of the pulse, then, we set up a criterion for unit time: △t = 1 second.
The frequency γ ∝ E, it can reflect the basic physical property of time: △t ∝ E.
(This is time associated with 3D physical space.)

The issue of “simultaneity” actually is an issue about logic rather than about the physical property of time.

Liqiang Chen
Jan 23, 2021
Piggy has been absolutely defined by the local dark lords of the Jiangmen city and who who of the Class 914 of the No1. Middle School of Xinhui as a semi – half payment watchman in their small business log long ago. That means they has defined piggy’s γ = 0. Bounce…

0 Replies

htam9876

2
Sun 24 Jan, 2021 02:31 am
Once upon a time, one former classmate of the Class 914 of the No. 1 Middle School of Xinhui said: “ah LiQ*, you lag far behind the era…”
Piggy agrees with his humble opinion very much. When some guys have bounced ahead to talk 6789 …dimensions, piggy is still here doing some research on the 3D space. There is an old Chinese saying: the tall building is based on the ground.
When a guy tries to talk what physics and what universe, piggy’s humble opinion is that he should understand the physical property of 3D space and the physical property of time associated with it first. Otherwise that guy sounds like “a tower floating on the air (空中楼阁)”.
Piggy encourages guys to touch the elephant in your own way (not necessary following pig’s idea) to break through the monopoly of the so called “standard model” which is absolutely the conspiracy of some people to set up a church on science.
Thank you, guys.
Albuquerque

1
Sun 24 Jan, 2021 07:35 am
@htam9876,
And I finally agree with the entirety of one of your posts top to end.
0 Replies

htam9876

1
Fri 29 Jan, 2021 07:59 am
The shape of event horizon vs the core of black hole, touchy and feely:

According to my physical model for elementary particle, after a huge star collapsed, an extreme situation might happen: all atoms and even the elementary particles would melt down, its internal energy might gather on a small spherical surface.
At such extreme level, physical theories such as Mass Point Dynamics, thermal dynamics
, etc, would no longer be applicable to describe it.
The black hole image just showed a round black spot (event horizon).
Sounds that piggy’s theory is in conformity with experiment.

Some people consider that the core of black hole is a singularity. Piggy wonders that what’s the shape of a singularity though?

Liqiang Chen
Jan 29, 2021
Piggy has been absolutely defined by the local dark lords of the Jiangmen city and who who of the Class 914 of the No1. Middle School of Xinhui as a half - self payment watchman in their small business log long ago. That means they has defined piggy’s shape = singularity. Bounce…

Albuquerque

1
Fri 29 Jan, 2021 03:03 pm
@htam9876,
Maybe there is nothing in but the surface of the black hole with all the information trapped in it!
htam9876

1
Fri 29 Jan, 2021 07:09 pm
@Albuquerque,
Good argument.
Piggy just provides some humble opinion for reference. Actually no one can see what sits at the center of the black hole. Never. So, people could conjecture in any way.
……………………………..
The conception of event horizon / Schwarzschild radius is “the border inside which the light can’t escape”. What cause such an odd phenomenon? There must be a reason at the center. “Nothing” can’t cause it (piggy would rather believe a pig head is there at the center, at least that’s something substantial). And also, that means the surface of the event horizon can’t contain all the information about the black hole.

(What piggy can’t understand is why the local dark lords of the Jiangmen city and who who of the Class 914 of the No1. Middle School of Xinhui must try every means to confine piggy as a half - self payment watchman in their small business to show up how glorious they are in the Jiangmen city. That means they has defined piggy = nothing. Bounce…)

Albuquerque

1
Fri 29 Jan, 2021 08:42 pm
@htam9876,
If 3D Universe is an hologram projected from the flat surface of a blackhole then you don't have the problem of what is inside. The max gravity pull is exactly at the surface with all the information and mass. Obviously this is just an avenue of speculation.

### Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King

1. Forums
2. » Cosmos vs us
3. » Page 3