@Palandre,
Quote:You are very delusional at his point. I have written before everything tnat is 'good' from 'government' can be done way better without 'government"
Which is simply a way of not acknowledging any good done by government - Because in brushing it off / glossing over it, you have:
- never acknowledged
any specific good
- never acknowledged the
huge breadth of specific good government does
(which would require a denialist to start acknowledging any & each specific good until they realised how large the list is)
- never acknowledged how
far reaching any specific good is
- never explained
why you think anyone would want to do the specific example that the government does
- never explained why anyone would provide specific services
to the extent that government does
(eg. Why would anyone else want to pay out of their own pocket to provide the public free schooling, free health services.
And the motive for anyone else running a Land Titles dept, would differ to why would anyone want to pay for a single community support services, would differ from...). So you cannot make a cover all explanation in the why department.
- never explained how they would do it better - which will also differ from specific example to specific example, so no cover all explanation of how exists.
- never opened your absent and likely non existent logic up to contest, obviously because it won't hold water
- never provided evidence for your delusional claims
Your reasoning for not doing this quite obvious - by lumping it all as one, and giving a very vague 'someone else can do it better'....you can ignore the
huge amounts of specific goods done by government; and the
extent of specific goods; and the
why & how of your supposed solutions...all by glossing over it with barely a thought. Same for why you call a system with real outcomes an illusion - so you can give no further thought to
fact that it produces real, existing, good outcomes. Whether or not government is a technical/conceptual illusion is irrelevant to the functions & workings that produce a plethora of good specific outcomes, meaning your belief in the illusion is irrelevant to the good it does (you claim it responsible for evils, admitting to a reality of it, but attempt to ignore & divert from its good - which is blatant hypocrisy). Engaging in such a piss poor denial of such a breadth of reality leaves your viewpoint in a very delusional state.
Quote:Besides that, I already have pointed to how to make solutions.
Uh huh. Provide a quote & link to anything that is not 'someone else can do it better' - which claim says
how (as you claim it does). You can copy the link address in the top right hand corner of every post. By the way, foisting a responsibility off onto another person will inevitably involve 'why would they want to do it?'
