14
   

Let's fire Trump

 
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 02:57 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
"IMPLIES".

You mean like the failed models did?
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 05:39 pm
Ford pauses production at Kansas City Assembly Plant due to COVID-19

Ford Motor Co. temporarily paused production at the Kansas City Assembly Plant in Claycomo, Missouri, on Tuesday to deep clean after a worker tested positive for COVID-19.

A UAW official confirmed an hourly worker had tested positive and the affected area was cleaned to protect other UAW members on the line.

The complete Ford statement, posted Tuesday afternoon, said:

"The safety of our workforce is our top priority. Working closely with the UAW and external experts in infectious disease and epidemiology, we have developed safety standards to protect our workforce. In this instance, our protocol calls for us to deep clean and disinfect the employees work area, equipment, team area and the path the employee took while at the plant today. We are temporarily pausing production at Kansas City Assembly Plant on the Transit side until the deep cleaning is completed. We are notifying people known to have been in close contact with the infected individual and asking them to self-quarantine for 14 days."


Kelli Felker, Ford global manufacturing & labor communications manager, told the Free Press only the Transit Van side of the plant was affected, that F-150 pickup production was not disrupted, and Transit production resumed after approximately one hour.



https://www.freep.com/story/money/cars/ford/2020/05/26/kansas-city-plant-production-claymoco-ford-worker-postive-covid/5262884002/
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 05:48 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Ford pauses production at Kansas City Assembly Plant due to COVID-19

And this pause will bankrupt Ford? More fearmongering by what might be the norm thanks to all the fearmongering in the first place. This virus is simply not as deadly as claimed. The quest to destroy the economy because of a 2016 loss and another loss to Trump coming in 2020.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 05:57 pm
Quote:
And this pause will bankrupt Ford?


No. It won't. That's just secondary reason to keep these plants shut down. I'm glad you agree with me: we're opening these plants too soon.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 06:05 pm
St. Louis Post-Dispatch Editorial Exposes Trump’s ‘Colossal’ Lie About Obama

The newspaper’s editorial board just wiped out Trump’s favorite talking point.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-obama-pandemic-budget-cuts_n_5eccc968c5b6ef8033030711

St. Louis Post-Dispatch Editorial Exposes Trump’s ‘Colossal’ Lie About Obama

The newspaper’s editorial board just wiped out Trump’s favorite talking point.
headshot
By Ed Mazza

President Donald Trump has repeatedly blamed former President Barack Obama for his own administration’s mishandling of the coronavirus pandemic.

“The last administration left us nothing,” Trump said last month.

But the St. Louis Post-Dispatch found that Trump’s own budget documents show the opposite ― exposing what it called “a lie of colossal Trumpian proportions.”

The newspaper’s editorial board said the Trump administration told Congress that the Obama administration left it with everything needed for a pandemic ― and sought big budget cuts from the programs as a result.

Trump’s 2020 budget asked Congress to cut the pandemic preparedness budget by $102.9 million, part of $595.5 million in requested cuts to public health preparedness and response outlay.

“Obama left office with an unblemished record of building up the nation’s pandemic preparedness,” the newspaper said. “Trump systematically sought to dismantle it.”

Trump has since blamed his predecessor for lack of personal protective equipment and testing supplies, saying “our cupboards were bare. We had very little in our stockpile.”

But the newspaper said a chart provided by the Trump administration with the budget shows that by 2016 ― Obama’s final year in office ― the nation’s public health emergency preparedness was at least 98% on every key measure.


“The last administration left us nothing,” Trump said last month.

But the St. Louis Post-Dispatch found that Trump’s own budget documents show the opposite ― exposing what it called “a lie of colossal Trumpian proportions.”

The newspaper’s editorial board said the Trump administration told Congress that the Obama administration left it with everything needed for a pandemic ― and sought big budget cuts from the programs as a result.

Trump’s 2020 budget asked Congress to cut the pandemic preparedness budget by $102.9 million, part of $595.5 million in requested cuts to public health preparedness and response outlay.

“Obama left office with an unblemished record of building up the nation’s pandemic preparedness,” the newspaper said. “Trump systematically sought to dismantle it.”

Trump has since blamed his predecessor for lack of personal protective equipment and testing supplies, saying “our cupboards were bare. We had very little in our stockpile.”

But the newspaper said a chart provided by the Trump administration with the budget shows that by 2016 ― Obama’s final year in office ― the nation’s public health emergency preparedness was at least 98% on every key measure.

“That’s by the Trump administration’s own assessment,” the Post-Dispatch said. “If the cupboard was bare, it’s because Trump swept it clean.”
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 06:09 pm
Editorial: If the pandemic-preparedness cupboard was bare, it was Trump's doing

https://www.stltoday.com/opinion/editorial/editorial-if-the-pandemic-preparedness-cupboard-was-bare-it-was-trumps-doing/article_bd1bb8d6-7477-590d-af72-ae4e305de601.html

Woe is Donald Trump. The long-suffering, misunderstood president just can’t make the world understand what a raw deal he got. The pandemic was China’s fault. Or was it the World Health Organization’s fault? One thing we know for sure, the lax U.S. response was President Barack Obama’s fault.

“We inherited a broken, terrible system …,” Trump told reporters on April 18. “Our cupboards were bare. We had very little in our stockpile.” That was Trump’s attempt, frequently repeated by the president and recycled in White House presentations, to lay responsibility for the inept pandemic response at Obama’s feet, as if three years in office were insufficient for Trump to repair all the supposed damage his predecessor wrought.

Except it’s a lie of colossal Trumpian proportions.

We’ve taken the time to dissect Centers for Disease Control and Prevention budgets from the year before Obama left office all the way to the present. Trump can lie, but the numbers cannot. Obama left office with an unblemished record of building up the nation’s pandemic preparedness. Trump systematically sought to dismantle it.

Perhaps because of his experience with the 2015 Ebola outbreak, Obama sought to leave his successor fully prepared to confront future pandemics. He asked in his fiscal 2017 budget request to boost federal isolation and quarantine funding by $15 million, to $46.6 million. Congress approved $31.6 million. In Trump’s three years in office, he has not requested a dime more in funding.

Obama asked to nearly double his own $40 million outlay for epidemiology and laboratory capacity. Congress balked, but Obama left Trump with that $40 million as a starting point. What did Trump do? In his 2020 budget, he asked Congress to cut that number to: Zero. Zilch. Nothing.

Obama’s goal was $629.5 million in funding for pandemic preparedness, though Congress only gave him $612 million. If Trump was so worried about a bare cupboard, why did he ask Congress to cut the 2020 pandemic preparedness budget by $102.9 million? In the 2019 fiscal year budget, he sought a $595.5 million cut in the overall public health preparedness and response outlay.

The CDC budget in Obama’s final year mentions “epidemiology” or derivatives of the word 252 times. Under Trump, the word appears 129 times. The phrase “pandemic preparedness” appears exactly once in Trump’s 2020 budget.

Interestingly, Trump’s own 2020 budget contains a chart comparing the nation’s public health emergency preparedness before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and where it stood in 2016 (why it stops with Obama’s final year is unclear). Before 9/11, the nation had a 20% ability to mobilize in response to a health emergency, a 5% ability to establish an incident-command system, and 0% storage and distribution capacity for critical medicines and supplies. By Obama’s final year, the nation’s preparedness on all measurements was 98% to 100%. That’s by the Trump administration’s own assessment.

If the cupboard was bare, it’s because Trump swept it clean.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  4  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 06:33 pm
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-CuT_g0nL_jA/Xs195tjnt-I/AAAAAAAA5hA/2TuuP7kQTesgvpjlq4G45jC5HuZ0dk3KQCLcBGAsYHQ/s400/98313561_3428544900569832_2220901449590636544_n.jpg
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 06:38 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Here is one reason.
Quote:
Trump condemns Cali’s mail-in voting as 62% of Americans say there will be fraud

https://www.independentsentinel.com/trump-condemns-calis-mail-in-voting-as-62-of-americans-say-there-will-be-fraud/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 08:45 pm

Quote:
How about this racist video from your ******* source????

How about it?
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 08:49 pm
The meat industry is trying to get back to normal. But workers are still getting sick — and shortages may get worse.

There are now more than 11,000 coronavirus cases tied to Tyson Foods, Smithfield Foods and JBS

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/05/25/meat-industry-is-trying-get-back-normal-workers-are-still-getting-sick-shortages-may-get-worse/

As covid-19 spreads through Nebraska meat plants, workers feel helpless and afraid

Workers at a Tyson Foods meat-processing plant in Lexington, Nebraska are getting sick with covd-19 and say the company hasn’t done enough to protect them. (Robert Ray/The Washington Post)

Taylor Telford
May 25, 2020 at 4:31 p.m. CDT

Tyson Foods, the largest meat processor in the United States, has transformed its facilities across the country since legions of its workers started getting sick from the novel coronavirus. It has set up on-site medical clinics, screened employees for fevers at the beginning of their shifts, required the use of face coverings, installed plastic dividers between stations and taken a host of other steps to slow the spread.

Despite those efforts, the number of Tyson employees with the coronavirus has exploded from less than 1,600 a month ago to more than 7,000 today, according to a Washington Post analysis of news reports and public records.

What has happened at Tyson — and in the meat industry overall — shows how difficult it is to get the nation back to normal, even in essential fields such as food processing. Meat companies have spent hundreds of millions of dollars on measures such as protective gear, paid leave and ventilation systems since they were forced to shut dozens of plants that were among the top coronavirus hot spots outside urban areas.
AD

But the industry has still experienced a surge in cases, and some companies say they are limited in just how much they can keep workers separated from one another. Only a portion of the labor force has gone back to work — some workers kept away on purpose — and the nation’s meat supply remains deeply strained as barbecue season gets underway.
Where's the beef? How the coronavirus pandemic is disrupting the meat supply chain

A May report from CoBank, which specializes in serving rural America, warns that meat supplies in grocery stores could shrink as much as 35 percent, prices could spike 20 percent and the impact could become even “more acute later this year” as the knock-on effects on the U.S. agriculture supply chain are felt.

Grocery stores have been able to partially meet consumer demand thanks to meat already in the supply chain in March, when the pandemic broke out, but the report said those supplies were quickly being used up.

Sign up for our Coronavirus Updates newsletter to track the outbreak. All stories linked in the newsletter are free to access.

The prospect of long-term shortages is giving rise to an intensifying debate about whether the industry should reopen faster or whether safety should be prioritized, even at the cost of the nation’s food supply.

With an April 28 executive order encouraging meat plants to reopen, the Trump administration has said the food supply must be weighted equally with safety. Over the past month, more than half of the 30 meat processing plants that had shuttered because of the coronavirus have reopened.

“Our objective is two equal goals,” Vice President Pence said in a meeting with Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) in early May. “Number one is the safety and health of the workforce in our meat processing plants, and, two, there’s strength in our food supply and getting people back to work.”

But others say that safety must be the paramount concern — and that the industry still has a long way to go before facilities are safe again.

“Absolutely, positively, no worker’s life is worth my getting a cheaper hamburger. No worker’s life is worth that,” former vice president Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, said at a Yahoo News virtual town hall last week.

Officials with the meat processors say they are doing whatever they can to protect workers, while trying to make sure the nation’s food supply remains sound.

“The safety of our team members is paramount, and we only reopen our facilities when we believe we can safely do so,” said Gary Mickelson, Tyson’s director of media relations.

What’s clear is that the industry’s efforts so far, though they may have lessened the virus’s spread, have not come close to stopping it. Over the past month, the number of infections tied to three of the country’s biggest meat processors — Tyson Foods, Smithfield Foods and JBS — has gone from just over 3,000 to more than 11,000, according to the Post analysis.
AD

Throughout the industry, worker deaths have tripled, surging from 17 to at least 63, according to the Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting, which is tracking outbreaks through local news reports.

Four of the plants that reopened saw outbreaks, with more than 700 positive cases, according to the center: Tyson Foods operations in Logansport, Ind., Perry, Iowa, and Waterloo, Iowa; and a Smithfield plant in Sioux Falls, S.D.

In Iowa, Nebraska and South Dakota, coronavirus cases linked to meat workers represent 18, 20 and 29 percent of the states’ total cases, respectively, according to the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit advocacy organization.

Many plants that have reopened are operating at reduced capacity, either because of widespread absences or to reduce the number of workers on a shift to allow for social distancing. Closures have affected 45,000 workers, according to the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, the largest organization representing meatpacking workers.
AD

JBS, the second-largest meat processor in the United States, said it is paying workers who could be particularly vulnerable to covid-19 — about 10 percent of its workforce — to stay home.

The debate over reopening, even amid safer conditions, can present difficult choices.

Meat plants are usually located in rural areas, where they are among the largest employers. Coronavirus infection rates in communities within 15 miles of meat plants are twice the national average, according to the Environmental Working Group.

The recent closures have cascaded through local economies, as farmers who supply plants are left with nowhere to take their animals. The National Pork Producers Council estimates that current plant capacities are creating backlogs of 170,000 hogs a day.

“These hogs will eventually stay on farms too long and grow too large to be accepted by harvest facilities. It is estimated that up to 10,069,000 market hogs will need to be euthanized,” the pork producer group said in a recent fact sheet.

A divide over safety

Although companies have tried to get back to normal operations, union and local officials question whether they are, in fact, ready.

Tyson’s biggest pork plant, in Waterloo, reopened May 7 with new safety precautions and social distancing policies. “Our top priority is the health and safety of our team members, their loved ones and our communities,” Tom Hart, the plant’s manager, said in a news release.

Tyson had just finished running a national ad campaign warning, “The food supply chain is breaking.”

But the Waterloo plant reopened the same day that health officials in Black Hawk County, where it is located, reported that more than 1,000 employees out of 2,700 there had tested positive for the coronavirus.

“Tyson did not go above and beyond,” said state Rep. Ras Smith (D), who represents Waterloo. “They did what they already should have done.” He called Tyson’s handling of the outbreak “appalling.”
AD

Smith and fellow state Rep. Timi Brown-Powers (D) said they suspect that President Trump’s executive order encouraged Tyson to reopen faster, a point the company disputes. The plant shuttered April 22 after weeks of resisting calls from local officials. The lawmakers said they met with the plant’s human resources director on May 1 and were told that the facility was weeks away from reopening.

Four days later, they said, they were told that production would resume May 7. They said there was no explanation for the new timeline.

“It really doesn’t feel like our local Tyson was in this big of a hurry to reopen,” Brown-Powers said. “It became a hurry for them because of the pressure they’re getting from above.”

Mickelson, Tyson’s spokesman, said in an email to The Post that the executive order had helped by providing “clear, uniform standards” for how processing facilities should protect workers and by giving the company better access to protective gear. But he said it didn’t accelerate the reopening of the facility.

A federal push to reopen

When he announced the executive order on April 28, Trump initially said it would solve “liability problems” for companies and force them to stay open during the pandemic.

“Now that Trump issued that executive order, it gives plants this insurmountable feeling that they are invincible,” said Kim Cordova, a local union president in Greeley, Colo., where a JBS beef plant was shuttered in April amid a coronavirus outbreak that has killed at least seven workers.

In practice, the order was more narrow, legal experts said. It designated meat producers as critical infrastructure and ordered them to follow federal guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. It also enabled Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue to take steps to get meat companies federal contracts and access to protective gear.

OSHA — the federal agency in charge of worker safety — has not issued enforceable guidelines for protecting employees from the coronavirus, as it did during the H1N1 outbreak in 2009, instead opting for voluntary guidance. The agency has said it plans no enforcement action so as not to overly burden companies during the pandemic.

Smithfield cited the Trump executive order in federal court in Missouri, arguing that it meant local and state authorities no longer had authority over meat processors. It was part of the company’s defense in a lawsuit filed by an unnamed employee alleging that Smithfield failed to protect workers by not accommodating social distancing and by discouraging sick employees from staying home.
The National Pork Producers Council estimates current plant capacities are creating backlogs of 170,000 hogs a day. (Abigail Dollins/Argus Leader/AP)
The National Pork Producers Council estimates current plant capacities are creating backlogs of 170,000 hogs a day. (Abigail Dollins/Argus Leader/AP)

“The president has identified state interference with meat and poultry processors as ‘undermining critical infrastructure during the national emergency,’ ” Smithfield’s attorneys said in court documents. “State law, whether statutory or through private lawsuits, cannot be used to regulate the subject matter covered by the EO. This task belongs exclusively to the federal government.”

U.S. District Judge David Gregory Kays dismissed the case 12 days later, citing the “significant steps” Smithfield had taken to reduce the risk of coronavirus infection at its plant in Milan, Mo.

In a news release, the company praised the outcome of the case, which it said was “frivolous, full of specious allegations that were without factual or legal merit.”

Less than two weeks after the case was dismissed, voluntary testing at the Milan plant revealed an outbreak at the facility, according to local news reports and the worker behind the lawsuit. She told The Post that fearful employees have been staying home, and those who do show up for shifts are working overtime to keep up production.

“They could have listened to workers and protected the company and the people by being proactive,” said David Muraskin, the worker’s attorney. “Now that they’ve failed to do the right thing, their responsibility is to make sure they take care of their workers and pay them their wages while the company puts in place the protections that should have been there all along to protect the community.”

Smithfield said the Milan plant is “operational” but declined to provide further details about absences and production capacity. The company said it would not confirm coronavirus cases “out of respect for employees’ legal privacy.”

Fearful employees

On April 16, the JBS beef plant in Greeley was forced to shut down after roughly 100 workers contracted the virus and three died. Another worker died during the closure, and four others since the facility reopened April 24.

Coronavirus cases at the plant now exceed 300, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment records show.

“We are raising hell because the numbers continue to rise,” said Cordova, the local union president. “People are scared to go to work because people keep getting sick. There are hundreds of workers who have not come back. We don’t know if they have moved on, if they are on ventilators. We can’t find them.”

Nikki Richardson, a JBS spokeswoman, said in an email that the company has adopted more than $100 million in enhanced safety measures throughout its facilities, including “increased sanitation and disinfection efforts, health screening and temperature checking, team member training, physical distancing, reduced line speeds and increased availability of personal protective equipment, including face masks and face shields.”

Cordova toured the Greeley plant last week and said improvements have been made on the processing side, where beef is cut into steaks, ribs and briskets. Metal dividers have been installed between workers, and protective equipment has been placed next to workstations so employees can avoid congregating to pick up their supplies.

Still, she said, additional safety measures need to be taken to lessen the risk of infection. Employees are still crowded in halls and stairways. Because of the loud noise in the plant, workers take off their masks and lean in close to speak to supervisors.

In the area where cattle are slaughtered, Cordova said, plastic dividers between work stations have yet to be installed.

“They are on rafters, right next to one another,” she said.

Richardson said the company the company is trying its hardest.

“We are doing the best we can to ensure social distancing in the facility, but we recognize the challenges that exist to maintain social distancing in areas where people naturally congregate,” Richardson said in an email to The Post. “We have hired people to be part of an employee health team that is responsible for covid-19 program management, compliance and auditing, including enforcing social distancing.”
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 09:13 pm
@bobsal u1553115,

Quote:
There are now more than 11,000 coronavirus cases tied to Tyson Foods, Smithfield Foods and JBS

How many have caused hospitalization and how many deaths? How many people are on ventilators?

How many are asymptomatic? These facts are always omitted and are important for people to decide for themselves how dangerous this virus is.
The virus is not as bad as the media says or those facts would be reported.

I could have said the WP is a progressive rag. Instead I challenged their facts and the omission of many facts, not their reputation or fact checker rating.




0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 09:18 pm
Give it a couple of weeks, junior.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 09:25 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Give it a couple of weeks, junior.

A couple more weeks of lies? Not necessary. The media is on life support trying to avoid Obamagate and instilling fear daily to keep chaos alive and well.

The prognosis is not good for the media. People have had enough of this bullshit. They will have 0 credibility before the election. Hell, they are close to that now.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 10:08 pm
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 10:12 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Fear mongering video. How original. Using those hundred thousand dead to get Trump shows Democrats and progressives have no respect for the dead at all.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 10:16 pm
Speaking of fear mongering:

No President Has Spread Fear Like Donald Trump

Travelers Arrive in the U.S. to Hugs and Tears After the Lifting of Trump's Immigration Ban
Current Time 0:02

https://time.com/4665755/donald-trump-fear/

By Alex Altman
February 9, 2017 2:55 PM EST

The world, Donald Trump wants you to know, is “a horrible mess.”

Radical Islamic terrorists are gathering strength. Christians are being executed en masse in the Middle East. Illegal immigrants lurk in the shadows. Gangs operate with impunity in our cities. The U.S. murder rate, the President falsely claims, “is the highest it’s been in 47 years.” Drugs are “pouring” across the border. “Bad people (with bad intentions)” are flooding through our airports.

Fear has always been an effective form of political rhetoric, and one deployed to great effect by countless presidents. As George W. Bush rallied support for the war on terrorism, his Administration introduced a color-coded threat matrix that never dropped below yellow. To push his crime bill, Bill Clinton warned that without a crackdown on violent juveniles, “our country is going to be living with chaos.”

“People react to fear, not love,” explained Richard Nixon, a scaremongering maestro whose cries for “law-and-order” were a coded message to white citizens worried about black crime. “They don’t teach that in Sunday school. But it’s true.”

And no President has weaponized fear quite like Trump. He is an expert at playing to the public’s phobias. The America rendered in his speeches and tweets is a dystopian hellscape. He shapes public opinion by emphasizing dangers—both real and imaginary—that his policies purport to fix.

“He is a master at it to a degree that I haven’t seen,” says Barry Glassner, a sociologist at Lewis & Clark College and the author of The Culture of Fear. “His formula is very clean and uncomplicated: Be very, very afraid. And I am the cure.”

Fear has been a fixture of Trump’s oratory since the start of his campaign, which began with an attack on Mexican immigrants. On the trail he sometimes called to the stage the bereaved parents of children who were killed by people in the U.S. illegally. His inaugural address was a dark rumination on “American carnage”: the factories “scattered like tombstones,” the “crime and gangs and drugs that have stolen too many lives.” In his speech at the Republican nomination convention, Trump described the U.S. in a “moment of crisis,” then he cast himself as its savior: “I alone can fix it.”
Related Stories

He has carried this approach into the White House. Trump’s daily tweets and remarks enumerate the daunting array of dangers facing ordinary citizens, from terrorists posing as refugees to the crime rate in inner cities. In many cases, Trump exaggerates the threat. The murder rate is actually down sharply from peak levels a generation ago. No refugee admitted to the U.S. has killed anyone in a terrorist attack since intense screening measures were imposed in 1980.

In some ways, Trump’s dark language have been matched by the left. In the early weeks of his Administration, some critics have sounded apocalyptic warnings about his presidency, with scholars and activists alike making comparisons to Adolf Hitler’s genocidal Nazi regime.

Even Presidents who sometimes wielded fear as a weapon tended to encourage the public to face threats with resolve. Trump is different. His approach is to seed fear, not assuage it. “Believe me. I’ve learned a lot in the last two weeks,” he told a gathering of police chiefs on Wednesday, “and terrorism is a far greater threat than the people of our country understand.”

Such remarks are part of a deliberate effort by the White House to demonstrate its vigilance in the face of danger. “I think what we need to do is to remind people that the Earth is a very dangerous place these days,” White House spokesman Sean Spicer explained Tuesday. “That ISIS is trying to do us harm. And that the president’s commitment is to keep the country safe.”

The tactics fit the mood of a fearful electorate. A Gallup poll released last April found that Americans are more concerned about crime and violence than anytime since before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Fifty-three percent of respondents said they worry “a great deal” about crime and violence, up from 39% in 2014.

That’s one reason why, despite the controversy they have generated, Trump’s executive orders have so far proven broadly popular. A Morning Consult/Politico poll found that 55 percent of American voters support the order to temporarily suspend the U.S. refugee program and bar citizens from seven majority Muslim nations from entering the country.

“The American people are afraid,” says a senior Administration official. “That’s what the President’s reflecting.”

Trump’s approach is particularly jarring because of the contrast with his predecessor. Unlike past Democrats and Republicans, President Obama largely shied away from using fear as a political weapon, Glassner says. Critics often excoriated him for his sanguine comments about the state of the war on terrorism. But hope, not fear, was Obama’s political metier.

Trump has a different approach, one that benefits from the echo chamber of social media. “He’s created an entire climate” of fear, Glassner says, “through this constant social media work that then creates a feedback loop. He tweets. The media writes about it. Cable TV has a panel that takes it seriously.” When he pumps alarm into the system, it lingers.

Trump’s approach is more the rule than the exception. “The whole aim of practical politics,” H.L. Mencken wrote almost a century ago,” is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”

Never has that adage been truer than now.

With reporting by Zeke J. Miller
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 10:19 pm
Trump’s latest exercise in fear-mongering is the most shameless yet

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2018/10/23/trumps-latest-exercise-in-fear-mongering-is-the-most-shameless-yet/

By
Max Boot
Columnist
Oct. 23, 2018 at 2:28 p.m. CDT

President Trump has made clear who he views as his core constituency: nativists with memory loss.

Once again, there is a caravan of Central American refugees heading toward the United States, and once again the president is acting as if the barbarian hordes were at the gates. He has even made up, out of thin air, accusations that suspicious Middle Easterners (read: terrorists) are mixed in with the desperate men, women and children fleeing crime and poverty. This is an absurd insinuation that is refuted by all the reporters who are covering the caravan and also by U.S. intelligence.

There is even less cause to imagine, as Trump suggests, that the Democrats (read: Jewish financier George Soros) must be paying these pitiful souls to flee their homes and walk thousands of miles on foot. Perhaps the refugees are coming here because they want to collect the free automobiles that Trump — also falsely — claims that the Democrats are eager to give to illegal immigrants? But Trump doesn’t need any facts to fuel his fear-mongering. With his typical understatement, the president tweets: “Sadly, it looks like Mexico’s Police and Military are unable to stop the Caravan heading to the Southern Border of the United States. Criminals and unknown Middle Easterners are mixed in. I have alerted Border Patrol and Military that this is a National Emergy. Must change laws!”
AD

Conveniently enough, Trump and his amen chorus at Fox “News” never bother to recall their meltdown over a similar caravan of refugees in April. Did that caravan unleash marauding hordes to rape and pillage? Nope. Most of the migrants stopped well short of the U.S. border. Some stayed in Mexico; others returned home. The Border Patrol reported catching all of 11 people linked to the caravan trying to enter the U.S. illegally. Another 244 or so migrants presented themselves to U.S Border Patrol offices to ask for asylum – as is their legal right.

It’s a safe bet that this caravan will peter out just like the last one did, when it eventually reaches the United States — which won’t happen for many weeks. They just crossed the Mexico-Guatemala border, about 1,100 miles from Brownsville, Tex. So the president’s white, elderly supporters, cowering in fear in Minnesota, afraid that the brown hordes will occupy their summer homes, can breathe easy. Televised pictures of a mass of people, shot from afar, can contribute to this false sense of alarm. Interviews with individual migrants should dispel the concern: These are poor people who, just like generations of immigrants to America, simply want to find a better life for themselves and their children.

There is no immigration emergency. Apprehensions of migrants along the southwestern border peaked at 1.64 million people in 2000. In 2017, there were only 303,916 apprehensions – a 81.5 percent decline. More Mexican immigrants are leaving America than arriving. The reason Trump is having a cow is because, after declining for his first few months in office, apprehensions increased in 2018, although they still generally remain below 2016 levels. Trump hasn’t built his vaunted border wall, and he hasn’t gotten Mexico to pay for it. But simply because Trump hasn’t succeeded in carrying out his fanciful campaign promises doesn’t mean we face an “existential” threat – as Newt Gingrich puts it – from dark-skinned newcomers.
AD

This is simply Trump’s cynical ploy to use racism and xenophobia as voter-turnout tools. And Republicans are happy to go along with the self-proclaimed “nationalist.” The GOP, my former party, used to dog-whistle to racists. Now it’s a wolf whistle.

Sabrina Siddiqui of the Guardian noted: “A review of nearly five dozen Republican-backed TV ads revealed a messaging strategy rooted in painting a dark portrait of immigrants, with a fixation on violence and crime. The threat of MS-13 and so-called ‘sanctuary cities’ are frequent themes, juxtaposed with Republican candidates vowing to support Trump’s promised wall along the US-Mexico border.”

It’s not only Latinos who are targets of Republican hate-mongering. In Upstate New York, Republicans are portraying Democratic congressional candidate Antonio Delgado, an African American Rhodes scholar and Harvard Law graduate, as a foul-mouthed “big-city rapper.” (He briefly tried to make it as a rapper more than a decade ago.) In another New York district, Republicans are airing commercials showing Democratic candidate Nate McMurray, a white man married to a Korean immigrant, speaking Korean. They actually insinuate that he is a pawn of Kim Jong Un — the very same dictator that Trump is in love with. In Virginia, Republicans are accusing Democratic candidate Abigail Spanberger, a former CIA operations officer, of being a terrorist sympathizer because she briefly taught as a substitute teacher at a high school that produced a graduate who was sent to prison for plotting to kill President George W. Bush.
AD

This is the (Pat) Buchananization of the GOP. Gone are themes of economic opportunity, limited government or American global leadership. It’s all culture war, all the time. Republicans are appealing for white votes by demonizing minorities. They should be ashamed of themselves – if, unlike their leader, they are capable of experiencing that emotion.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 10:21 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Radical Islamic terrorists are gathering strength. Christians are being executed en masse in the Middle East.

That is not fear mongering that is fact. Would you like to see the proof? I can produce plenty.
Quote:
Gangs operate with impunity in our cities

Also a fact. MS13 is all over the country. Not to mention homegrown gangs.
Quote:
Drugs are “pouring” across the border.

Also a fact, what a waste of pixels that post was. Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 10:22 pm

Trump never lets facts get in the way of some good fear-mongering

By Maria Cardona, opinion contributor — 10/11/18 01:30 PM EDT

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/410939-trump-never-lets-facts-get-in-the-way-of-fear-mongering

Donald Trump’s recent op-ed in USA Today was a wholly misguided narrative designed to do one thing: scare.

This op-ed, and the newly minted Republican talking point warning of an “angry mob” if Democrats win in November, betrays both how afraid the GOP and Trump are about the midterm elections and the lengths to which they will go to turn around their fortunes.

Trump’s piece is so misleading that it is impossible to highlight all of the factual inaccuracies here. But let’s start with a few of the more easily fact-checked whoppers Trump boldly claims:

Trump claims that as a candidate, he promised to protect coverage for patients with pre-existing conditions and create new health-care insurance options that would lower premiums and that he kept that promise.

Facts say that the Trump administration joined a lawsuit brought by Republican attorneys general aimed at striking down parts of the Affordable Care Act, including protections for people with pre-existing conditions:

“President Donald Trump isn’t playing it straight when it comes to his campaign pledge not to undercut health coverage for people with pre-existing medical conditions. Five weeks before midterm elections, he is telling voters that those provisions ‘are safe,’ even as his Justice Department is arguing in court that those protections in the Affordable Care Act should fall.”

Trump also claims that he is fighting "hard against the Democrats’ plan that would eviscerate Medicare.”

Well, facts are pesky things. The New York Times pointed out, “First, not only has Mr. Trump failed to strengthen Medicare and Social Security, the financial outlook for both trusts has largely worsened … In June, the government projected that Medicare funds would be depleted by 2026, three years earlier than estimated in 2017. The report noted that less money will flow into the fund because of low wages and lower taxes.”

Boldly, Trump continues to try to paint Republicans as the protectors of Medicare, as he states: “Republicans believe that a Medicare program that was created for seniors and paid for by seniors their entire lives should always be protected and preserved.”

But again, facts tell us that congressional Republicans’ 2019 budget proposed huge cuts to Medicare. According to The Hill: “House Republicans offered a budget proposal that would cut mandatory spending by $5.4 trillion over a decade, including $537 billion in cuts to Medicare and $1.5 trillion in cuts to Medicaid and other health programs.”

So the reality is that after passage of the massive GOP tax cut for the rich that balloons our deficits, worried Republicans looked to slash Medicare as well as Social Security for deficit reduction.

Trump also claims Democrats want "open-borders socialism." Nothing could be further from the truth — though it makes for a great talking point. He is creating a political euphoria for his base even if it is only a mirage.

No Democrat in the House or Senate or running for either is for open borders. While some candidates are talking about abolishing or reforming U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the context is the restructuring of our immigration system so that ICE (or whatever it becomes) does not act like the militarized enforcer of a terror-based nationalistic police state.

In fact, in the last real immigration legislative debate, Democrats were pushing a comprehensive immigration reform bill that would have added billions for border security, an E-verify system to ensure employers would not hire workers without documents and thousands more Border Patrol agents.

This does not sound like an open-border policy, but Trump never let a good set of facts get in the way of his fear-mongering.

Now we are hearing Trump at his last few rallies using the new tactic of referring to Democrats as an "angry mob." This phrase was seemingly started by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in the wake of the Kavanaugh hearing debacle in which self-proclaimed sexual assault survivors were being ignored by their elected officials.

Trump warned that if Democrats win the midterms, they will turn the country into Venezuela. It is beyond the pale for Trump to compare democratically elected officials to a dictator despot. Moreover, this line of attack is laughable coming from Trump.

He is the one who bestows nothing but compliments to the world’s most ruthless strongmen and dictators, like the Philippines' Rodrigo Duterte, Turkey's Recep Erdoğan, Russia's Vladimir Putin and North Korea's Kim Jong Un.

It is ironic that Trump, in his fear of losing, is using fear to try and hang on to power.

But the “mob” is indeed angry. This group is made up of women, supportive men, Democrats, progressives, independents, party-less Republicans and everyone else who is sick of what this country has become under Trump and sycophantic Republican members of Congress who are incapable of holding him accountable.

So lies, alternative “facts” and fear will not work this time around for Trump and the GOP. America is taking its anger from the halls of Congress, to the streets and straight to the ballot box. We will remember in November.

Maria Cardona is a principal at the Dewey Square Group, a Democratic strategist and a CNN/CNN Español political commentator. Follow her on Twitter @MariaTCardona.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 26 May, 2020 10:27 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:

Trump never lets facts get in the way of some good fear-mongering

An opinion piece from two years ago does not change the fact the media and Democrats are fear mongering now, does it?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Let's fire Trump
  3. » Page 40
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/24/2024 at 05:00:27