@Linkat,
Linkat wrote:
And this report is saying the US is instead having more alcohol related deaths than COVID as a result.
Linkat, that report does not say that at all.
In fact the report does not even mention alcohol once.
What it Does say is:
Those excess deaths — the number beyond what would normally be expected for that time of year — are not necessarily attributable directly to covid-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus. They could include people with unrelated maladies who avoided hospitals for fear of being exposed or who couldn’t get the care they needed from overwhelmed health systems, as well as some number of deaths that are part of the ordinary variation in the death rate. The number is affected by increases or decreases in other categories of deaths, such as traffic fatalities and homicides.
and
The fact that the picture of overall death during that period changed so substantially this week underlines how real-time counts of covid-19 deaths are only a partial snapshot.
Honestly? I have no idea why that link was even provided in the article about South Africa. It has nothing to do with the subject.
I have both empathy and sympathy for people who are either so addicted to alcohol they might be one of the small number that goes into DT's.
They also might not be able to obtain their needed counseling or meds, and would need small amounts of alcohol to control their symptoms.
But in the real world, if someone can't get alcohol and would be one of the few that would go into DTs (and remember, only a small percentage of people going through alcohol withdrawl go into DTs), they will either smoke some weed, or get some other drug to take on their own to suppress the symptoms.
I am going to go out on a limb here and say that if you drink that much alcohol, you more than likely are also taking other stuff too.
Also, let's weigh in on the other deaths that occur due to alcohol use.
Backing up first, I had cited in an earlier post that the higher number of people experiecing DTs in the US a year is 70K. I just look it up, and 4% of those people die from that.
So even if all 70K people who would get DTs if they stopped drinking, couldn't find a convenience store that sells beer, can't get it from a friend, etc etc. ALL got the DTs at the same time, about 3000 would die
But in the real world, many of them would somehow get ahold of alcohol, or take something else that would prevent them.
Contrast that to over 10,000 dying each year in car accidents that involved alcohol.
Also, what about other accidents that results in death because a person was drunk? Boating accidents, drowning, shootings, falls and many more.
The points made by everyone are valid. However, we don't live in a vacuum where we only have to concern ourselves with the priority of keeping liquor stores open because DTs, or someone who can't get mental health assistance, and requires a bit of alcohol to keep it in the road.
I'm wondering how many people are walking around alive right now because they weren't killed by a drunk driver in the last few months, or shot/beaten to death etc. That leads to how many people didn't experience the loss of the primary breadwinner, caregiver, child.
Not tossing them by the wayside, but if someone is that far compromised that they would not only get, but die of DTs, they are also sick and impaired in so many other ways that are not compatible with life in general.
<shrugs> liquor stores are open. I've got no dog in this hunt. My opinion is it is a near pure money passing hands decision. If the reason "people will get DTs, they need it to dose other mental issues" is enough to keep liquor stores open, ok.