0
   

The Democrats Gloat Thread

 
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Jul, 2006 04:14 am
I must admit to a weakness to that kind of speculation, I even made a thread about it once -- you might find it interesting:

What would you vote if you lived in ...?
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Jul, 2006 04:17 am
nimh wrote:
Amigo wrote:
Nimh, If you had to vote by party in America, would you vote Republican or Democrat? (only two choices)

You have to ask? Razz

I would Never In My Life vote Republican.

>


I geuss your right, I should have known that. I smoked alot of pot in high school.

Yes, the Green party. I forgot about them. I was invited to one of their meetings a long time ago. At this time we can't afford to split the vote. It's the Bush people Vs. the rest of us. The A.B.B.A. party, Anybody But Bush Again.

If you were Bush, what would you do tomorrow? (you don't have to answer. I'm just bull$hiting)
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Jul, 2006 04:21 am
McGentrix wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
McG, Why would it matter if polls are accurate whether it's done in urban and/or metro areas?


Because people are different. If you polled 1000 people in the heartland, do you really believe the polls would be similar?


Two questions: Where is the heartland? And is the zip code e i e i o?

The one thing you have to remember when looking at polls and the people who conduct them is that the pollster doesn't care what the results will be, the pollster wants to get it right. (Obviously, there are push-polls wherein the questioner IS seeking a particular view, but to my mind those aren't really polls, those are false advertising.)

Having worked on creating a statewide political poll for a news organization (in the heartland of Oklahoma), I can assure you that we worked on getting the questions formed properly and the demographics spread as widely as possible.

What good would it be to conduct a poll that constantly got it wrong? It would be like selling compasses that only occasionally indicated North, fairly soon you would have no buyers.

(BTW: one result that surprised me was (this was in the late 70's) the more rural a district the more likely voters were to be in favor of better relations with the USSR. Folks in Oklahoma City and Tulsa were neutral or opposed. Hmmm, whys-dat? Mebee rural farmers sell big shiploads of wheat to bad bad commie people. Red wheat means big green for the boondocks so let's make nice. Yah neveh know.)

Joe(who are you? Who who?)Nation
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Jul, 2006 04:33 am
Amigo wrote:
If you were Bush, what would you do tomorrow?

Shoot myself...
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Jul, 2006 04:37 am
nimh wrote:
Amigo wrote:
If you were Bush, what would you do tomorrow?

Shoot myself...
Laughing Interesting policy, foreign and domestic all rapped into one. You know, it's so crazy, it just might work.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Jul, 2006 04:44 am
Amigo wrote:
nimh wrote:
Amigo wrote:
If you were Bush, what would you do tomorrow?

Shoot myself...
Laughing Interesting policy, foreign and domestic all rapped into one. You know, it's so crazy, it just might work.
Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Jul, 2006 10:16 am
"Chicken-hawks" don't kill themselves.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 06:34 am
Quote:
Two questions: Where is the heartland? And is the zip code e i e i o?


Joe

Is that your original joke?
0 Replies
 
Vietnamnurse
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 12:26 pm
Blatham:

He stole it from Old MacDonald (Had a Farm)! Laughing
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 12:30 pm
I think "stole" is a little harsh... LOL
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 01:10 pm
blatham wrote:
Quote:
Two questions: Where is the heartland? And is the zip code e i e i o?


Joe

Is that your original joke?


God no, heard it forty years at Thee Coffe House, San Angelo, TX. I stole it right away. I worked up a little riff on it to use while re-tuning the twelve string to explain just where my house was.

"We live so far out in the country the zip code is e i e i o. The place is 50 miles west of Jesus!-where-are-we, Texas, but it's not in the middle of nowhere. No. The middle of nowhere is where we make the turn North towards the house.

But we don't live on the edge of nowhere, no, we don't. You can see the edge from the barntop, but it's still a ways down the road.

It's lonely out there, but we like it. The voices in my head and I really like it. There's a tree and a stream. The tree is about a thirty minute drive south and the stream shuts down in mid-April till about December but it has a nice oily sheen on it when it's wet. Brings a little color to the place.

I brought a girl out there and hoped we'd settle down together, but somehow the chain snapped . I tried to follow her tracks but along came the June-July-August dust storm and I had to give her up for lost.

So, it's just me and Buck, my faithful dog, sitting on the porch baying up at the moon and stars. Yeah. Though, I can't spend too much time looking up at the stars, the last time I did ol Buck bit the hell out of my leash hand and ran off toward East Jesus.

Now lemme play you a little "Dough-re-mi"..... "



Joe(Starts with a 'C-chord)Nation
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 01:16 pm
Crap, that was supposed to be a PM to Blatham.. .

Sorry, back to gloating.



Joe( Embarrassed )
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 01:20 pm
Joe(quick with the post finger)Nation. You can delete a post before somebody adds another post.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 02:02 pm
Joe Nation wrote:
Crap, that was supposed to be a PM to Blatham..

I enjoyed it tho! Razz
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 02:26 pm
Joe Nation wrote:
Crap, that was supposed to be a PM to Blatham.. .

Sorry, back to gloating.



Joe( Embarrassed )


LOL...all very funny indeed, joe. And yup, I'll now steal the joke too.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Jul, 2006 08:19 pm
Actor Ed Begley Jr said that when he did standup, the places he played were so far out in the sticks that he was reviewed by Field & Stream.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 12:08 am
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Jul, 2006 09:33 am
Breaking from NewsMax.com

Ann Coulter Censored Again By Newspaper

Editor & Publisher, a newspaper trade magazine, slammed Ann Coulter again.

The latest installments in the magazine's jihad against Coulter includes a story that Georgia's Augusta Chronicle has become the second newspaper to drop Coulter's nationally syndicated column. The magazine said Coulter's "stridency" has crossed the line.

Since Coulter's new book, "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," shot to the top of the best-seller lists, liberal media outlets have been furious that Coulter criticized four of the 9/11 widows for their political activities.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jul, 2006 01:31 am
I was heartened to note that Mr.Nimh, if he was able to vote in the US presidential election, might have voted for Nader. I am delighted that there are people with principles who would vote for someone like Nader.

I urged many people I knew to vote Nader in the last election(but only if I was fairly certain that they would have voted for Kerry).

I am hopeful that Nader( or a surrogate) will run on a "GREEN" platform in 2008. Keeping in mind the closeness of the races in 2000 and 2004, a Green Candidate may indeed get the votes that would have gone to Hillary Rodham Clinton in a close election.

GO-NADER-GO!!
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jul, 2006 06:06 am
BernardR wrote:
I was heartened to note that Mr.Nimh, if he was able to vote in the US presidential election, might have voted for Nader.

I'm afraid you have misread me. What I wrote was, "Whenever the race between Dem and Rep would not seem extremely tight, one way or another, I would vote Green or the like (but not Nader)." (emphasis added).

I like the politics of the Green Party - but I don't like those of Nader, personally, not the ones he's developed since he continued his campaign in earnest in 2000. Some of my beef with Nader was summarised in this 2000 article: Ralph the Leninist.

BernardR wrote:
I am hopeful that Nader( or a surrogate) will run on a "GREEN" platform in 2008. [..] GO-NADER-GO!!

Here I'd like to point out that Nader was actually denied the Green Party's nomination in the last elections. Instead, in 2004 the Green Party ran its own candidate, David Cobb, a sympathetic fellow.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 12:51:14