McGentrix wrote:cicerone imposter wrote:McG, Why would it matter if polls are accurate whether it's done in urban and/or metro areas?
Because people are different. If you polled 1000 people in the heartland, do you really believe the polls would be similar?
Two questions: Where is the heartland? And is the zip code e i e i o?
The one thing you have to remember when looking at polls and the people who conduct them is that the pollster doesn't care what the results will be, the pollster wants to get it right. (Obviously, there are push-polls wherein the questioner IS seeking a particular view, but to my mind those aren't really polls, those are false advertising.)
Having worked on creating a statewide political poll for a news organization (in the heartland of Oklahoma), I can assure you that we worked on getting the questions formed properly and the demographics spread as widely as possible.
What good would it be to conduct a poll that constantly got it wrong? It would be like selling compasses that only occasionally indicated North, fairly soon you would have no buyers.
(BTW: one result that surprised me was (this was in the late 70's) the more rural a district the more likely voters were to be in favor of
better relations with the USSR. Folks in Oklahoma City and Tulsa were neutral or opposed. Hmmm, whys-dat? Mebee rural farmers sell big shiploads of wheat to bad bad commie people. Red wheat means big green for the boondocks so let's make nice. Yah neveh know.)
Joe(who are you? Who who?)Nation