0
   

The Democrats Gloat Thread

 
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 10:11 am
sozobe wrote:
Yep, I remember that from Kerry, too, a certain self-fulfilling prophecy in that people are more willing to vote for a candidate they see as "stronger", and part of the "stronger" equation is how much support the candidate has. I could see how that would work for the party as a whole -- if the Republican party as a whole is reeling, that could impact the perception of strength (or lack thereof) for an individual Republican candidate.


Yep. Spine over gelatinous matter just about sums up '04.

It always wins votes and will continue to do so until the conditions we face change. All else is secondary.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 10:14 am
That wasn't my point at all, and is in fact the opposite of my point, which was that perception shapes reality.

Meanwhile, we'll still be fighting in Iraq in 2008, with no end in sight? Great.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 10:16 am
Current public sentiment is that the republican party is rife with cronyism and corruption, current republican spin is that the dems have no ideas, interesting.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 10:30 am
sozobe wrote:
That wasn't my point at all, and is in fact the opposite of my point, which was that perception shapes reality.

Meanwhile, we'll still be fighting in Iraq in 2008, with no end in sight? Great.


I know, but if the economy holds strong and we see a reduction in gas prices, there will still be the single-issue voters and guess what that issue will be?

Why would you think there's no end in sight? We'll stand down when the Iraqis can stand up. If that's before '08 great. It will happen.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 10:32 am
That was purely going by what you said -- if "staying the course" is a campaign issue in 2008, that would mean the end still wouldn't be determined by that point.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 10:35 am
JustWonders wrote:
nimh - if I understand you correctly, you're saying that even if a Republican likes the job his Republican representative is doing, in the next election, he'll most likely vote Democrat because he thinks overall they'd do a better job?

We disagree, if that's your take on it.

Huh? How did you come away with that?

Elections are rarely decided by Republicans or Democrats defecting their own camp en masse.

They're usually decided by how the Independents sway.

How hard is it for you to imagine an Independent going something like this?:

"Hey, last time I voted for this Joe Smith guy, and I still like him allright enough - but Congress' still a mess. The Republicans there are doing an especially lousy job, and dont even get me started on their President. Huh. This Smith guy's OK - he did well getting us that highway. But if I put him back in again, he's gonna vote along with anything Bush and Delay are gonna come up with next, too. This war's a mess, and those people are spending our money like water. Bugger. Well, that Dem guy - I dont think much of the Dems either, but he doesnt look like he'd seriously mess up ... cud give him a try."

There. A voter who would answer the poll exactly like the majority of respondents did: yes, I like my own representative OK; no, I dont like what Congress is doing and I like what the Republicans in Congress are doing even less; and I think that Republican President's doing a lousy job. Does that still strike you as a "how do you explain that?!" kinda thing?

Most incumbents have a lead of less than 10%, even 5%. There only needs to be a few of those guys and you got your incumbents on their way out, not to mention the open seats.

That break it down better for you?


JustWonders wrote:
I know my comments regarding the poll in general sound like sour grapes to you, but really, I read the questions and some of them made me laugh. Especially the one concerning the Supreme Court, which made me wonder if the people being polled could even name 4 of the 9 justices or could even come up with one landmark case (other than Roe v. Wade).

So wait - your arguments about how you don't buy the Battleground poll results I was posting, and you were dismissing, were based on the fact that you dont like the questions in the CNN/USA Today poll?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 10:42 am
nimh, you got to pick your "facts" wherever they might be, one from column a, one from column b and then you get egg roll.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 11:48 am
nimh - I could just as easily see your hypothetical as Joe Smith being thoroughly disgusted with both parties, but realizing that Bush is headed in the right direction on immigration and other issues important to the average voter, realizing the economy continues to show strong growth despite the natural disasters, and don't forget if Mr. Smith is religious, he'll most likely identify more with conservative "values".

I hear what you're saying and it also makes sense...on paper. I just don't think there's going to be any landslides for the Dems in the near future. We'll know for sure in just over a year.

I apologize for my confusion on the two polls. I scanned your post on p.73 and thought you were referencing the USA/CNN poll for some reason.

Now I need to go and try to get myself all worked up over the fact that "Scooter" is scooting LOL.

<Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz>

Smile
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 01:42 pm
JustWonders wrote:
nimh - I could just as easily see your hypothetical as Joe Smith being thoroughly disgusted with both parties, but realizing that Bush is headed in the right direction on immigration and other issues important to the average voter, realizing the economy continues to show strong growth despite the natural disasters, and don't forget if Mr. Smith is religious, he'll most likely identify more with conservative "values".

I'm sure you can easily "see" him thinking that.

But we were contesting what the findings of these polls we've been referencing mean. And the difference is that my little anecdote refers point by point to their actual findings - and yours is point by point refuted by them.

Ie, you can see him "realizing that Bush is headed in the right direction on immigration and other issues important to the average voter".

Well, neither poll says anything about immigration (except that only 3% considers it the number 1 problem). But on whether Bush is headed in the right direction the polls are quite clear about what Joe Average thinks: no. 55% disapproves of the way George W. Bush is handling his job, and for the first time ever a majority disagrees that George W. Bush "has the personality and leadership qualities a president should have".

As for immigration, the most recent poll on that issue is from October 3-5, and it finds that all of 21% (!) approves "of the way George W. Bush is handling the issue of immigration"; a staggering 53% disapproves.

You can see Joe Average "realizing [that] the economy continues to show strong growth". (Joe Smith was the guy he was (not) voting for ;-))

Again, the two polls we've been quoting give only circumstantial evidence, but all of it contradicts what you see Joe Average as thinking.

Eg, in the USAToday poll, 50% think the Democrats would do a better job of dealing with the economy; only 38% think its the Republicans. In the Battleground one, the Dems enjoy 7% and 14% leads on "keeping America prosperous" and "holding down federal spending".

But, for a direct answer we got to look at the other most recent polls. Two weeks ago, the Gallup poll asked respondents, "How would you rate economic conditions in this country today?". 28% said excellent or good; 72% said "only fair" or "poor". Moreover, asked whether they thought "that economic conditions in the country as a whole are getting better or getting worse?", only 24% said better, and 68% said worse.

Finally, you remind me that "if Mr. Smith is religious, he'll most likely identify more with conservative values". Good point - in America, Joe Average would be religious.

Problem is, the polls again don't substantiate your speculation about what Mr. Smith feels. One of the most surprising things in them is, after all, that the Republican lead on values is neutralised for now.

In the Battleground poll, respondents were equally split about who shared their values more, the Democrats or GOP (46% to 45%). In the USA Today poll, 57% of respondents said the Republican Party represented their values very well or moderately well; and 58% said the same about the Democratic Party.

Amazingly, even on the question who more "shares your attitudes about the role of religion in politics", the Republican and Democratic Parties score equally well (53%).

In short, in my improvised anecdoe I tried to illustrate what Joe Average is actually thinking according to the polls - the only thing we've got to go on re: his current state of mind. In yours, you were just making up what you think Joe Average should be thinking. That's all well and fine - everyone's entitled to their visions - but remember that personal speculations make for little ground to make appeals to authority on about what "most people in this country" think...

Then again, dont mind me, I'm in the "reality-based community", an' all... :wink:
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2005 08:27 am
You may think you're more "reality-based" than me, nimh, and I know you're just dying to believe both polls are 100% accurate Smile

I'll remain a bit skeptical, but I have to wonder if it's me or those respondents living in a fantasyland.

An article just yesterday (regarding the strong economic growth recorded this quarter) pointed out the poll findings on the economy and gently indicated that the respondents were just plain wrong.

Even as many on the left were rejoicing at yesterday's "bad" news for this administration (Scooter scooting) the stock market soared 170 points.

Again, I think many are just disgruntled at the high energy prices and buying into the shrieking headlines spelling disaster for this administration at every turn.

This, of course, is all just my opinion (personal speculations, if you will) but instinct tells me that when these same people are asked to choose in both '06 and '08, my "personal speculations" will prevail.

<Then y'all can go back to calling them 'stupid' LOL>
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2005 12:09 pm
JustWonders wrote:
You may think you're more "reality-based" than me, nimh, and I know you're just dying to believe both polls are 100% accurate Smile

Well, all I was saying was that in this particular discussion of what we submit "most people" in your country are thinking, I was going on what figures we actually do have at hand, however imperfect polls are, whereas you were just making it up as you went along, according to what you think people should be thinking.

JustWonders wrote:
I'll remain a bit skeptical, but I have to wonder if it's me or those respondents living in a fantasyland. [..]

Again, I think many are just disgruntled at the high energy prices and buying into the shrieking headlines spelling disaster for this administration at every turn.

[..] instinct tells me that when these same people are asked to choose in both '06 and '08, my "personal speculations" will prevail.

<Then y'all can go back to calling them 'stupid' LOL>

Wait. So basically, you manage here to, in one and the same post, call Joe Average stupid ("living in fantasyland", "buying into shrieking headlines") - and scorn liberals for tending to call Joe Average stupid?

Stupendous.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Oct, 2005 07:23 pm
Only you could equate "fantasyland" with "stupid" LOL.

This economy, for instance, is in excellent shape as many analysts will agree. The anti-Bush media often portrays it otherwise, as studies have shown, and I think a lot of people believe what they read without bothering to do their own research.

I don't think they're stupid (time constraints, perhaps), but I do think the leftwing media is guilty of misleading many of us.

I've already made my predictions on '06 and '08, and so now all that's left is the waiting. If you take comfort from the cited polls, I doubt you're alone. It's happened in the past and it's always a bit amusing to see the dazed and confused Dems standing around scratching their heads and wondering "wha happened???". When they can't figure it out (although there's plenty within their own party right now trying to clue them in), that's when they start yelling "stupid".

We'll see how it goes. If you're up to it, maybe we can even have another "bookie" thread. That was fun and I learned a lot. Smile
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Oct, 2005 07:30 pm
just giggles, so just how many illegal aliens come across our borders monthly?
Quote:
maybe we can even have another "bookie" thread
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Oct, 2005 10:01 pm
It's a wonderful economy, if your name is Halliburton, Bush, Cheney, etc. The poor slobs at the bottom don't get heard anymore.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Oct, 2005 12:06 am
JustWonders wrote:
This economy, for instance, is in excellent shape as many analysts will agree. The anti-Bush media often portrays it otherwise, as studies have shown, and I think a lot of people believe what they read without bothering to do their own research.




Try the economists at the US Census Bureau. This is what they have to say.
US Census Bureau wrote:
The median earnings of both men and women who worked full-time, year-round declined in 2004.
Source
See that? Working people are going backward. How can you say that the economy is in good shape?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Oct, 2005 12:15 am
JustWonders wrote:
Only you could equate "fantasyland" with "stupid" LOL.


Since the use of 'living in fantasyland' obviously is different in the USA to the rest of the world, I may use this term no more often.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Oct, 2005 06:41 am
Alito appointment. The goal now is to draw republicans back into harmony and set up a big fight with dems quickly.

This will, so goes the plan, 1) get republicans moving together again, 2) make it apparent they are moving together (appearance being everything, it is believed -expect to see right wing talking points which trumpet the born-again unanimity almost as much as they talk about Alito), 3) make it seem as if Bush is back in the driver's seat (macho and in control of events and people -"what a fighter he is"), 4) and, of course, to turn attention away from all the substantial negatives in the air right now, not least the indictment(s).

The main immediate dangers for Bush et al are 1) indictment coming down on Rove or someone else, 2) the Alito choice, with its predictable fireworks perhaps including nuke option etc, further alters the public's perception/understanding of how 'extreme', divisive and power-mad this administration actually is.

The longer term dangers - economy, energy prices, Iraq, all the statistical trends for Bush and congress - they aren't going away.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Oct, 2005 07:28 am
Quote:
Public opinion appears to be running against Bush. Almost half the public, 46 percent, say the level of ethics and honesty in the federal government has fallen with Bush as president, according to an ABC News-Washington Post poll. That's three times the number who say ethics and honesty have risen during that time.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-CIA-Leak-Investigation.html

Now, isn't that an interesting result.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Oct, 2005 08:47 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
JustWonders wrote:
Only you could equate "fantasyland" with "stupid" LOL.


Since the use of 'living in fantasyland' obviously is different in the USA to the rest of the world, I may use this term no more often.


Let me give you an example, Walter: All those who strenuously assert that Bush lied to get the US into a war with Iraq .... those folks are living in a fantasyland. That doesn't necessarily mean they're stupid.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Oct, 2005 09:04 am
Law.com on Judge Alito:

Quote:
"It seems to me that the pressure to nominate a woman is considerably lessened now, and the focus is on getting someone confirmed. Judge Alito will be grudgingly confirmable to many Democrats once they look at his record," Goldstein wrote.

...

On the hot-button issues, Alito has been consistently conservative -- so conservative that some lawyers have given him the nickname "Scalito." Roughly translated, the nickname means "Little Scalia," suggesting that Alito has modeled his judicial philosophy after Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

...

In the media frenzy that accompanies any Supreme Court nomination, Alito's nickname is sure to surface. One Internet Web site is already poised to cash in on opposition to many of the potential nominees with a line of bumper stickers. Among the offerings is one that reads: "There's a reason they call him 'Scalito.'"

In some ways, the "Scalito" moniker hits the mark. In his 13 years on the 3rd Circuit, Alito has earned his stripes as a strong and intelligent voice on the growing conservative wing of a court once considered among the country's most liberal.

And as with Scalia, lawyers say Alito's vote is easy to predict in highly charged cases. But where the nickname misses is temperament, or what some might call personality. Both on the bench and in person, Alito is no Scalia.

Although he's a frequent dissenter and not at all afraid to disagree with his colleagues, Alito's opinions are usually devoid of passion. And his tone during oral arguments is probing but always polite -- a sharp contrast from the often-caustic tone adopted by Scalia both on the bench and in his dissents.

Oddly enough, the "Scalito" nickname seems to have caught on even among some conservatives who appear to use it as a compliment.


LINK
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 06/12/2025 at 03:58:31