I suppose, my liberal-colored glasses aren't changing my view there either - I don't use hearing aids
Ticomaya wrote:Walter Hinteler wrote:Hmm, I only read the transcript black on white ... from a conservative website.
Audio links can be found ...
HERE.
When does this link actually lead to the debate?
The prelude by these three idiots (Stop The War Productions) is unbelieveable! David Klein is obviously a luddite drunk. The other two are wonderful examples of liberal jackasses.
David (The Utter Drunken Moron) Klein: "Isn't Bill O'Reilly the guy with the anal cyst?"
Have another glass of Thunderbird Dave!
I'm still awaiting the debate, but incredibly amused by the three morons who are providing the introduction.
"Do you think Americans could have such a debate?" asks the idiot Lefty Woman.
Wait.. now they are playing Chuck D's latest recording! Word!
Please, please, please...Liberal A2Kers tell us how wonderful this crap is.
Tico! Your link doesn't connect to the debate, just these three idiots blathering on and on and on...
Walter - can you provide a link to the transcription?
Thanks
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:Tico! Your link doesn't connect to the debate, just these three idiots blathering on and on and on...
Walter - can you provide a link to the transcription?
Thanks
Sorry . Debate starts about 45 minutes in, I think. In these links, it starts about 45-50% into link "two."
Transcript can be found ...
HERE.
Ticomaya wrote:Transcript can be found ...
HERE.
Hitchens had the better of it, but that was to be expected as he has, at least, twice the intellect of Galloway.
I have to say though, I think that if I hear/see one more person in a debating crying "Shame on you!" I think I'll vomit.
Hinchen is an arrogant s.o.b., but Galloway is a despicable whore.
Sheesh, don't sugar coat it Finn. Tell us how you really feel.
Ahh, good old Pacifica Radio and Amy goodman. Where would we be without them. Hey, Why has the best debate on the war so far by foreigners?
There's nothing for democrats to gloat about:
Amid Turmoil, G.O.P. Seeks to Regain Grip on Its Agenda
By ROBIN TONER
and DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK
Published: October 2, 2005
WASHINGTON, Oct. 1 - After a brutal political month, Republicans are scrambling both to reassure their conservative base and to send a broader message to the American public - that they are, in fact, confronting the real-world issues of soaring gas prices, Hurricane Katrina relief, Iraq and immigration, while the Democrats are consumed with partisan warfare.
In a range of interviews on Friday, Republicans acknowledged the shock waves of the last few weeks, capped by the indictment of Representative Tom DeLay of Texas, the House majority leader, which forced the reorganization of the Republican House leadership even as it struggled to deal with the fallout from Hurricane Katrina.
Forum: The 109th Congress
"It's been a difficult week, I'm not going to sugarcoat it," said Representative David Dreier, the chairman of the Rules Committee, who has assumed new duties in the reshuffling. "We know we've got a big challenge ahead, but we've got an agenda."
Representative Peter T. King, Republican of New York and chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, agreed. "You get your job done," he said. "You can't panic. Even though our poll numbers are going down, there's no great love for the Democrats, no great support."
There have rarely been more troubled times for the Republican governing majority. The DeLay indictment and President Bush's second-term slump in the polls come amid a host of challenges and problems in domestic and foreign policy, including rising gas prices, the furor over the government's response to Hurricane Katrina, and public discontent with the war in Iraq.
I wonder when the democrats are gonna wake up from the stupor?
Interesting last sentence, cicerone. I am so disppointed with the Democrats for letting the Repulicans define what they stand for. Doesn't anyone have those "you-know whats" anymore. It's driving me crazy that so many people are talking about a Hillary run for the White House. Are the Democrats suicidal???? I think she is doing just fine in the Senate and who knows maybe she would make a good president, but in the slim likelyhood she actually won, her entire adminstration would be under attack rendering it useless. Reminds me of what my father used to say (everybody's parents said this) If Jimmy told you to jump off a roof, would you do it. In the meantime, I plan to take up a collection to buy the Party backbones. Even if I can only buy one, maybe they can pass it around on an as needed basis.
glitterbag wrote:Interesting last sentence, cicerone. I am so disppointed with the Democrats for letting the Repulicans define what they stand for. Doesn't anyone have those "you-know whats" anymore. It's driving me crazy that so many people are talking about a Hillary run for the White House. Are the Democrats suicidal???? I think she is doing just fine in the Senate and who knows maybe she would make a good president, but in the slim likelyhood she actually won, her entire adminstration would be under attack rendering it useless. Reminds me of what my father used to say (everybody's parents said this) If Jimmy told you to jump off a roof, would you do it. In the meantime, I plan to take up a collection to buy the Party backbones. Even if I can only buy one, maybe they can pass it around on an as needed basis.
Are the Democrats suicidal? No.
Are they out of touch with reality? Yes?
Please, please, please...nominate Hillary!
Democrats may not be suicidal, but they are a party without a voice.
Suicide would probably be preferable. They're just occupying space.
Hmmm. This thread is entitled the "Democrat Gloat Thread". Come on guys. There must be something about your party you can celebrate?
We are indeed celebrating as we watch the demise of the republican party before our very eyes.
cicerone imposter wrote:Democrats may not be suicidal, but they are a party without a voice.
Suicide would probably be preferable. They're just occupying space.
And Republicans are mighty grateful.
It is not an issue of a shortage of persuasive Liberal voices; it is the bankruptcy of American Liberal thought.
How can Liberals promote Liberal thought when they run from the label "Liberal?"
No matter what one might think about Conservatives, they are not ducking their label.
What is required of liberals is a total re-examination of their message and a parting of the ways with Liberal doggerel. True liberals are neo-cons.
I'm not so sure about "true liberals are neocons," but Clinton came pretty close to defining a good democratic party.
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
Are the Democrats suicidal? No.
Are they out of touch with reality? Yes?
Please, please, please...nominate Hillary!
Yes, let's have more of this:
"The White House is still struggling to recover from its faltering response to Hurricane Katrina. The Republican Party is busily trying to wave away a scent of second-term scandal. The relentlessly bloody insurgency in Iraq continues to weigh heavily on his presidency. And no president can retain his political authority for long if he loses his claim to the center.
"The swagger is gone from this White House," said Charles E. Cook Jr., editor of The Cook Political Report, a nonpartisan newsletter, citing a litany of other difficulties afflicting the administration, including high gasoline prices and the failure of Mr. Bush's push to overhaul Social Security. "They know they have horrible problems and they came up with the least risky move they could make."
"
