maporsche wrote
Quote:I have stated why I believe this in other threads. This thread is not the place to talk about that :
Then why did you bring it up here???
Quote:BVT's posts show him judging that MJ is indeed guilty, he doesn't flat out say it, but it's implied. Or he's cracking a joke
and you are judging BVT! If he didn't say it, how do you know that is what he thinks?
Quote:If your opinion is that MJ is guilty, then you are indeed judging him. What else would you be doing?
The fact that you used the word
if indicates that you do not know what I think either. Did I say he was guilty? Again, I stated opinions... not once did I make a judgement.
This thread is entitled "The jackson verdict is FINALLY in" ---- the discussion has been limited to that, until now. My opinion is that he may be guilty...I did not judge him on this. It is only an opinion and I certainly won't prosecute him now that he is deemed to be innocent by a jury of 12 men and women. They did the judging.
Quote:I would say it's about 40% to gain knowledge, understanding, and 60% to stir up the pot. The percentages could vary depending on the day.
So, as an agnostic, you are not a lost cause as it were. 40% of your time in the religiious threads is to gain knowledge. This is a good thing and to your credit. It is the other 60% that concerns me.