The jackson verdict is FINALLY in

fishin said

Quote:

Jackon's spokesman told the press that after all of this "He just wants to return to his life of anonimity."

Oh that we could make this actually happen. I dont see Michael maturing into another Frank Sinatra, or even A Ringo Starr.

0 Replies

Or even a Paris Hilton...The man is radioactive...

0 Replies

heeheeheeheeheeheeheeheehee

Well I'm not uptight
Not unattracted
Turn me on tonight
Cause I'm radioactive

0 Replies

Bet heöll sing that tune to another boy, tomorrow night, boss!

0 Replies

I hear they're celebrating with a "petting party" at the Neverland Zoo.

0 Replies

I agree with squinney. Jackson is weird, but one of these days I expect the full story will come out and we'll hear stories about how his handlers controlled everything, ala Elvis.

I don't know if he's a pedophile or not, but I do think the parents of that boy were predators. I am happy to see that they didn't get away with what amounts to extortion.

0 Replies

I never figured out how his mother's greediness, if that's what it was, meant Jackson had or hadn't abused the kid. Anyhow...

I was kinda hoping that someone, anyone, would come to Jacko's defense here. Or are they all outside the courthouse? Someone to say, "Michael is just misunderstood. He's really a beautiful person...."

I'm disappointed.

0 Replies

Earlier thread continues here:

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1394937#1394937

0 Replies

My opinion, for what it is worth, is that MJ definitely has some problems. I think we can all agree on that. I do believe that his problems extend to improper association with young boys. Whether he is a pedophile or not, I do not know.

I do think that if he was sued by parents who's sole motivation was justice and not the almighty dollar, there would be more credence to the charges. That said, I would also not be surprised if the members of the jury are driving around in new cars in the near future.

Any parent that lets their child 'sleep over' at the Jackson household in the future should be charged with neglect.

0 Replies

Læknir, by then he'll be singing

I'm just burnin'
Doin' the Neutron Dance ! ! !

0 Replies

I'm guessing that the predatory mother made the prosecution's case less credible.

I'm waiting for the civil case. I know that the burden of proof is lower in a civil case. The question is whether the dress code in civil cases is also more relaxed. Maybe pajamas will be acceptable in a civil court. I'm hoping for tops and bottoms, with little giraffes and baby elephants as the print theme.

0 Replies

I think that had I been molested by an international superstar, I would be reluctant to take place in his trial. No one would want to be faced with the media circus and instant notoriety.

If there are multiple victims, I could easily understand that no one is stepping forward-- money or no.

It is very difficult for victims of non-famous abusers to fact them in court.

0 Replies

I love all the people who just can't accept that he may not of molested anybody.

"He's different so he must be guilty, I don't care what the jury decided. I'm judging him myself."

I recognize a few of you from the Religion forum, except over there you're preaching that only god can judge anyone.

Bill O'Riley will be pretty pissed too. Did anyone else hear him go off the other night about how MJ must be gay?

0 Replies

Intrepid wrote:

I do think that if he was sued by parents who's sole motivation was justice and not the almighty dollar, there would be more credence to the charges.

I agree with this 100%!

0 Replies

D'artagnan wrote:

I was kinda hoping that someone, anyone, would come to Jacko's defense here.

I don't think there are many people that would be willing to defend Jackson, other than for legal fees. The man has some obvious issues to work through. But I am troubled by a public prosecutor who would spend ten years pursuing someone and losing with what seemed to me to be a contrived case. I would like to know what this mans agenda was.

0 Replies

Now I can PROUDLY wear my t-shirt that reads "Michael Jackson did not molest those children...he made love to them."

0 Replies

maporsche wrote:

I love all the people who just can't accept that he may not of molested anybody.

So, you must think it's ok for grown men to sleep with 13 year old boys and give them Jesus Juice?

0 Replies

Bella Dea wrote:

maporsche wrote:
I love all the people who just can't accept that he may not of molested anybody.

So, you must think it's ok for grown men to sleep with 13 year old boys and give them Jesus Juice?

This is pretty assumptive isn't it?

First off, he was found 'not guilty' of giving any minor 'jesus juice'.
Second, we was found 'not guilty' of molesting the accuser.

Whether or not I feel him falling asleep in the same bed as a 13yr old is right or not doesn't change the fact that it isn't illegal.

My opinion, and yours for that matter means nothing. I am going to assume that he did not do anything illegal otherwise the verdict would have been different. We have to have confidence in our law system.

You can go on judging him all you like though.

0 Replies

I don't know what to think about whether he's a pedophile or just bizarre, but I was half-hoping for him to go to jail just so I could finally learn if it really is a prosthetic nose or not... will the truth never be known?!?

0 Replies

maporsche wrote:

quote="maporsche"]I love all the people who just can't accept that he may not of molested anybody.

Quote:

My opinion, and yours for that matter means nothing. I am going to assume that he did not do anything illegal otherwise the verdict would have been different. We have to have confidence in our law system.

If this is true, then why does anybody bother to post their opinion? Jurys find people guilty and they find them not guilty. Jurys base their opinions on the evidence that is presented. They can then make a correct or incorrect decision. The fact that a jury finds someone not guily is a fact in law. The person, however, is not necessarily totally innocent based on the jury's decision. Right or wrong, people are entitled to their opinions.

0 Replies

The jackson verdict is FINALLY in

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know