Eorl wrote:If x=2 Then the answer would be 454.
Maybe I should have written it 34_ + 11_
but I know you understood my point even if my example looked dodgy. It simply represents a situation that seems obvious but not definite due to the lack of complete data.
Well, with the notion you used...your example fell apart.
And even with your further explanation...your example really makes very little sense.
Quote:I guess my point is that even though you cannot have an answer you can be certain of, you can make a reasonable estimate based on the data you do have.
Okay...and I make estimates all the time.
Suppose you itemize all the "data" you have that there are no gods so that we can evaluate it.
MY GUESS: The only "data" you have are variations on "they cannot produce a god."
Quote:Agnosticism seems to be principled refusal to make a guess no matter how educated that guess may be...
Oh, horseshyt. Agnosticism is no such thing. And the only reason I can see for you supposing it to be that...is to make you feel better about your blind guesses.
Quote:...., (perhaps due to the fear that it may validate all other guesses as equally valid)...is that a fair comment?
No it is not.
Here is a statement of my agnosticism as regards the "existence of gods" question:
I do not know if a God exists...
...I do not know if no gods exist...
...I do not have enough unambiguous evidence upon which to base a reasonable guess.
What problem do you have with that?