0
   

Leftist hatred,a perfect example

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 07:30 pm
to do today:

condemn www.godhatesabuggerthatdriesandtanglesinanosehair.com

http://www.searchthe.net/Images2002/checkbox.gif
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 07:30 pm
Setanta wrote:
BLT made it up, Boss, it's not a legitimate link . . .


shyt, what gave me away?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 07:31 pm
Physic, man, i'm physic . . .
0 Replies
 
dora17
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 07:31 pm
Setanta-- I know, silly, it's called joking... Laughing

I may not have been on A2K long, but I know when bvt is b-s-ing
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 07:31 pm
old europe wrote:


Now we're getting somewhere...vive le righteous indignation!!!!!
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 07:32 pm
dora17 wrote:
I know, silly, it's called joking... Laughing

I may not have been on A2K long, but I know when bvt is b-s-ing


that's pretty much like shooting fish in a barrel...don't get smug.... :wink:
0 Replies
 
dora17
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 07:34 pm
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
dora17 wrote:
I know, silly, it's called joking... Laughing

I may not have been on A2K long, but I know when bvt is b-s-ing


that's pretty much like shooting fish in a barrel...don't get smug.... :wink:


That's how i know-- i look for something you posted, and I say, "BS!" Smile

(I condemn bullshitting, BTW)
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 07:37 pm
You can't condemn bullshitting...nothing would ever get done....I condemn your cavalier attitude towards somethig as vital to our National interests as bullshitting....
0 Replies
 
dora17
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 07:39 pm
I'm ready to condemn anything right now... it's fun, gives me a sense of power lacking in my day-to-day life...
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 07:40 pm
I condemn the feeling of powerlessness thrust upon us by todays present climate....
0 Replies
 
dora17
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 07:44 pm
Where's mm gone? Our condemning is beginning to lack focus, I think we need to be given more links to direct our ire.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 08:07 pm
he's left in condemnation of playfulness ?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 08:12 pm
old europe wrote:
Do you only condemn the godhatesamerica-site, or the godhatescanada- and godhatessweden-sites as well?


Damn good question old europe!
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 08:15 pm
mysteryman wrote:
yitwail wrote:
here's a site MM should condemn right away, unless he agrees that Ronald Reagan is in hell, with Reggie White and the Pope:
http://www.godhatesamerica.com/


Your right,a site like this deserves condemnation,and in my opinion,removal from the web.
If that is a church website,then the church has some serious problems.
I can and do condemn that site and the people that created it,and want nothing to do with them or their idealogy.


Did you miss the part where he hates Christians too? The Church does not have problems. The "church" that Phelps heads has problems!

As much as I deplore this site and everything that it stands for, I disagree with your comment that it should be removed from the web. Don't you believe in free speech etc. etc.? Question Shocked
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 08:23 pm
Intrepid wrote:
As much as I deplore this site and everything that it stands for, I disagree with your comment that it should be removed from the web. Don't you believe in free speech etc. etc.? Question Shocked


<serious mode>

That's actually really interesting. No problem with the website (easily ignored), but what about the hate preaching? Is that covered by 'free speech'? They're saying in their FAQ that they "aren't associated with any violent group of degenerates that thinks killing people is a good thing", but what do they actually want? They say they want the "problem to get fixed"... How?

(Trying an analogy: if they were Muslims, preaching to hate America and all the yadayadayada, in the US, would that be okay?)
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 09:23 pm
There is a principle of restraint in the free speech issue, which was elucidated by Mr. Justice Holmes in his theater analogy--which ran that freedom of speech does not protect the right to yell "fire!" in a crowded theater. He also coined the phrase "clear and present danger." Ironically, although the Supremes came to the same conclusions about free speech after the time at which he sat on the court, he was often writing a minority, dissenting opinion during his own tenure.

The Godhatesamerica/Godhatesfags clown is smart enough to know that to stay in business, he has to meet that standard of not yelling fire in a crowded theater. So long as it cannot be convincingly alleged that he abuses his freedom of speech to advocate criminality, he can stay in business. There are groups which monitor such activities, the Southern Poverty Law Center and B'nai Brith (sp?) coming most immediately to mind.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 09:29 pm
The Southern Poverty Law Center

B'nai B'rith
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 09:32 pm
old europe wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
As much as I deplore this site and everything that it stands for, I disagree with your comment that it should be removed from the web. Don't you believe in free speech etc. etc.? Question Shocked


<serious mode>

That's actually really interesting. No problem with the website (easily ignored), but what about the hate preaching? Is that covered by 'free speech'? They're saying in their FAQ that they "aren't associated with any violent group of degenerates that thinks killing people is a good thing", but what do they actually want? They say they want the "problem to get fixed"... How?

(Trying an analogy: if they were Muslims, preaching to hate America and all the yadayadayada, in the US, would that be okay?)


I believe that it is covered by free speech in the sense that they present it. I hate what they say, but I defend their right to say it...as much as that irks me. If they were going beyond what the law allows, I imagine they would be shut down...that would be a good thing. I do not know what they want and I doublt that they really do either.

Your analogy only includes Muslims when it could cover a fast array of groups. Again, I do not think that it is right, but if it is ok in the U.S. they why should it not be ok elsewhere?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 09:33 pm
ACLU defends Rush as well as KKK.
0 Replies
 
LionTamerX
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 09:34 pm
Setanta wrote:
There is a principle of restraint in the free speech issue, which was elucidated by Mr. Justice Holmes in his theater analogy--which ran that freedom of speech does not protect the right to yell "fire!" in a crowded theater. He also coined the phrase "clear and present danger." Ironically, although the Supremes came to the same conclusions about free speech after the time at which he sat on the court, he was often writing a minority, dissenting opinion during his own tenure.

Why do I have this urge to visit the Senate and yell "Fire!"
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Leftist hatred,a perfect example
  3. » Page 6
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 06:55:57
▲ ▼