2
   

Bolton and the UN

 
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Jun, 2005 09:42 pm
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
What has happened under his watch that I should be joining my friends from the North in ripping him a new a-hole?



Dissembling again, Finn. Check the polls, laddie. To suggest that this is a Canadian thing is simply 'disasembling'.

What was it that Republican Senator Chuck Nagel said about the WH operating in a world of, now how was that phrased, something along the lines of delusionary?

Heeelllllllloooooo Finn.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Jun, 2005 09:45 pm
JTT wrote:
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
What has happened under his watch that I should be joining my friends from the North in ripping him a new a-hole?



Dissembling again, Finn. Check the polls, laddie. To suggest that this is a Canadian thing is simply 'disasembling'.

What was it that Republican Senator Chuck Nagel said about the WH operating in a world of, now how was that phrased, something along the lines of delusionary?

Heeelllllllloooooo Finn.


Oh how you love "disasembling" (sic).

Answer the question if you can.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 12:51 am
Thursday, Dec. 22, 2005 11:28 a.m. EST
Kofi Annan Loses Cool Over Car

Embattled UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan lost his cool and lashed out at a reporter who questioned him about his son's Mercedes-Benz.
The very undiplomatic outburst came at Annan's year-end press conference, when he attacked James Bone, a correspondent with The Times of London who has raised questions at daily UN briefings about Annan and his son Kojo's possible involvement in the oil-for-food scandal in Iraq.
An 18-month investigation cleared Annan of influencing an oil-for-food contract that went to a company that employed Kojo, but was strongly critical of his management of the $64 billion program.

At the press conference, Bone asked Annan about the whereabouts of a Mercedes bought by Kojo and imported into Ghana using his father's diplomatic immunity to avoid paying taxes and customs duty.

"I think you're being very cheeky," the normally low-key Annan interrupted.
"Listen, James Bone, you've been behaving like an overgrown schoolboy in this room for many, many months and years. You are an embarrassment to your colleagues and to your profession. Please stop misbehaving and please let's move on to a serious subject."


Ironically, the tirade came just minutes after Annan - whose term expires next year - said a thick skin and a sense of humor were essential character traits for any future secretary-general, The Australian newspaper reports.

The president of the UN Correspondents Association came to Bone's defense, saying: "I really have to do this for the record. James Bone is not an embarrassment. He's a member in good standing of UNCA. He had every right to ask the question." Annan countered: "I reserve the right to refuse to answer questions I don't want to answer."

He never did address the question about the Mercedes.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 01:07 am
Lash wrote:
Thursday, Dec. 22, 2005 11:28 a.m. EST
Kofi Annan Loses Cool Over Car

Embattled UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan lost his cool and lashed out at a reporter who questioned him about his son's Mercedes-Benz.
The very undiplomatic outburst came at Annan's year-end press conference, when he attacked James Bone, a correspondent with The Times of London who has raised questions at daily UN briefings about Annan and his son Kojo's possible involvement in the oil-for-food scandal in Iraq.
An 18-month investigation cleared Annan of influencing an oil-for-food contract that went to a company that employed Kojo, but was strongly critical of his management of the $64 billion program.

At the press conference, Bone asked Annan about the whereabouts of a Mercedes bought by Kojo and imported into Ghana using his father's diplomatic immunity to avoid paying taxes and customs duty.

"I think you're being very cheeky," the normally low-key Annan interrupted.
"Listen, James Bone, you've been behaving like an overgrown schoolboy in this room for many, many months and years. You are an embarrassment to your colleagues and to your profession. Please stop misbehaving and please let's move on to a serious subject."


Ironically, the tirade came just minutes after Annan - whose term expires next year - said a thick skin and a sense of humor were essential character traits for any future secretary-general, The Australian newspaper reports.

The president of the UN Correspondents Association came to Bone's defense, saying: "I really have to do this for the record. James Bone is not an embarrassment. He's a member in good standing of UNCA. He had every right to ask the question." Annan countered: "I reserve the right to refuse to answer questions I don't want to answer."

He never did address the question about the Mercedes.


He's a smooth one, our Kofi.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Dec, 2005 08:30 am
BOLTON COMES OUT SWINGINGRemind us: Just why did the Democrats oppose this guy?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Dec, 2005 09:09 am
Maybe they've found a way to get payoffs from the UN slushfund, too.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Dec, 2005 09:24 am
Quote:
[...]
Ms Rice also has the real Mr Bolton to contend with. Although he was moved from the state department, reportedly at her request, the walrus-moustached ideologue continues to be a thorn in the state department's side from his new position as envoy to the UN. In August, apparently without Ms Rice's agreement, he excised references to the millennium development goals from a draft due to be adopted by the UN general assembly. It took a three-way phone conversation between Mr Straw, Ms Rice and Kofi Annan, the secretary-general, to calm tempers and restore much of the original language. When the president addressed the assembly, he explicitly endorsed the millennium goals.
[...]

source: She has revived the art of talking, but can Rice make a real change?
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Dec, 2005 09:27 am
They should award Bolton a medal each and every time he walks through that door.

Smile
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Dec, 2005 09:30 am
Since all this happened already a week ago, you may have forgotten how it happened: it was a compromise, and not a victory for the one site or Bolton.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Dec, 2005 09:32 am
Oh. And another medal each time he walks out...alive.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Dec, 2005 09:32 am
Some anonymous guy wrote:

That's a victory? The implication that the UN will enact reforms? Any more such victories and the American people will be forced to erect a very tiny statue to honor the achievements of John Bolton.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Jul, 2006 09:20 am
Democrats Criticize Bolton as Ineffective
Democrats Criticize Bolton as Ineffective
At Hearing on Extending His Term, Republicans Defend U.N. Ambassador
By Charles Babington
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, July 28, 2006; A05

Senate Democrats unleashed a sharp volley of criticism of President Bush's foreign policy yesterday, arguing that John R. Bolton has done more harm than good as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and does not deserve an extended term. If Bolton's style were less divisive, they said, he might have achieved more reforms at the United Nations and tougher sanctions against Hezbollah and North Korea.

But Republicans defended Bolton and the administration and said it would be unwise to change ambassadors when the Middle East is in crisis and Iran and North Korea are threatening nuclear advances. Democrats said it was unclear whether they would try to filibuster Bolton's nomination this fall, as they successfully did last year.

Bush angered Democrats last August by giving Bolton a "recess appointment" to the U.N. post after the Senate twice failed to muster the 60 votes needed to end debate on his nomination. The appointment will expire by December, and Bush is asking the Senate to confirm Bolton for the rest of his term, saying the outspoken ambassador has proved his effectiveness.

Several Democrats hotly disputed that claim at yesterday's hearing before the Foreign Relations Committee.

"My objection isn't that he's a bully, but that he's been an ineffective bully and can't win the day when it comes, when it really counts," said Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.), who led last year's opposition.

Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.), the panel's top Democrat, said, "At the moment of the greatest need for diplomacy in recent history, we are not particularly effective at it."

Most committee Republicans defended Bolton, including Sen. George V. Voinovich (Ohio), who opposed him last year. "I know that one of the concerns that everyone had was that you might go up there and do your own thing, that you didn't understand how important consensus was," Voinovich told Bolton. "And I think you have been very, very active in working on consensus to get things done at the United Nations."

Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.) said: "I've watched you work, I've visited with your colleagues. I want you to know you have my unequivocal, unhesitating support."

Committee members differed on Bolton's role in helping shape the U.N. Security Council's demand that North Korea suspend its recent missile tests. "Mr. Bolton publicly assured anyone who would listen that he could get support for a resolution with teeth, with so-called Chapter 7 obligations," Dodd said, referring to sanctions that could include military action. "Turns out, of course, he couldn't."

After China threatened a veto, the Security Council adopted a milder resolution.

Bolton defended the action, saying the resolution "in our judgment is fully binding on North Korea." He added: "It demands -- that's the word the council used, 'demands' -- that North Korea suspend all activity relating to its ballistic missile program."

Biden, turning to the fighting between Israel and the Syrian-backed Hezbollah militia in Lebanon, said Bolton did too little to demand enforcement of U.N. Resolution 1559, which calls for disbanding such militias and expanding the Lebanese army's control.

"What steps did you take to put on the agenda the two parts of 1559 that seemed to be totally ignored?" Biden asked.

Bolton said: "In each case we reaffirmed 1559, and that's part of pressuring Syria . . . to continue the diplomatic efforts that we're able to do. There's no U.N. force that's going to make Syria do any of those things."

Sen. Lincoln D. Chafee (R-R.I.) challenged Bolton's claim that "the root cause" of the renewed Israeli-Hezbollah conflict is terrorism.

"You're a brilliant man," Chafee told Bolton. "That statement doesn't make any sense. Terrorism is a device. There's got to be something deeper for the root cause."

Bolton replied: "I think the real root cause is the absence of a fundamental basis for peace in the region."

Dodd renewed a complaint that was central to last year's opposition, demanding to know more about Bolton's delving into the identities of U.S. officials who were mentioned in conversations that were monitored by the National Security Agency. Dodd said Congress has the right to know such information, and Bolton said he did not object. But the Bush administration repeatedly has refused Dodd's request.

Bolton told the committee that the past year in New York has not changed his views of the United Nations, which he often has portrayed as ineffective and corrupt. That did not sit well with Dodd, who said the ambassador "clearly has an aversion, in my view, to being diplomatic or to building consensus for U.S. positions. And that is deeply troubling to me."

Sen. George Allen (R-Va.) defended Bolton, saying countries such as China and Cuba have thwarted his efforts. "You tried to get the United Nations, particularly the Human Rights Council, to be reformed," Allen said. "I know you tried as best you could."

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) showed no such sympathy, at least at first. The Republicans' call for Bolton's confirmation in the name of continuity at the United Nations is "reflective of a very weak and subservient Senate," she said. But she paused in the middle of a blistering critique of Bush's policy in Iraq to say: "Now, Mr. Bolton, this has nothing to do with you. I'm not putting this on you. As a matter of fact, I'm saying to you: You've got a tough job here."
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bolton and the UN
  3. » Page 8
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.4 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 02:55:19