Bolton and the UN

For what it's worth: I predict Boltan will be confirmed.

BoltAn ??? Maybe you're not quuuuuuite as up to speed on this issue as you think, Finn. Or is this just a slip of the mind because of a Texas twang?

Whether or not Boltan is the best candidate for the position, he is the president's. The role of the Senate is not to determine whether or not there is a better candidate, but whether or not the nominee is at all acceptable.

Duuuuuh, that is precisely what they are doing. You know, gather info on the subject, bring that information into committee, debate that info, vote on the man following the rules of procedure. What part of this don't you understand, Finn?

Give me an effin break! Does anyone really think that the opposition to Boltan is anything other than politically motivated?

The facts state otherwise. And, shock of shocks, requested info relating to this very issue, [guess where from] has been denied.

Hey, if the Dems can deliver the Repub President a defeat by rejecting Boltan than so be it --- that's politics, but lets not fall prey to the furious spin that would suggest that Boltan is some sort of demon is disguise.

The first couple of Finn paragraphs seeks to deny inherent political rights to committee members. Now this one hails that process as the, well you know, "mom & apple pie" right way.

You must be dizzy from the spin, Finn. Let me suggest a new signature line; what you've written is the dictionary entry for 'insipid'.

I will, hereafter, be happy to ignore your mewing.

why things are happening to Bolton's nomination that don't happen to other nominations?

Sounds like Bush is still determined to push Bolton through.
The arrogant little brat still thinks, amid the lowest approval ratings since what, Nixon?...that he can just do what he wants because he wants to do it.

Amazing.

Why do you canadians concern yourselves with such trivial matters? Our representative to the UN is our concern, perhaps you should go get in line for a check up.

No, I was just making a snide comment in retaliation for the baseless insult against our president.

McGentrix wrote:

No, I was just making a snide comment in retaliation for the baseless insult against our president.

Baseless?
You've got to be kidding me?

What justification do you appeal to then by insulting me, my nationality, my input, or my interest in the United States delgate to the United Nations.

And then candidone1 goes on to answer his/her own question:
It's so typical to lob Canadian or French slander in defense of you prized jerk off for a President. I am thoroughly enjoying watching his little empire and his little conquests crumble with every gaffe that trips out from behind his agonizing face. This President is the biggest joke to the collective international community and you continue to lube your palm and continue stroking.Enjoy yourself on your continued Bush-gratifying endeavors McG. You would do him proud.

Of course none of the preceeding presents a rational base for insulting the American president.

Like I said, baseless. Canada would barely be a decent state. It's no wonder you guys are so eager to discuss American politics, especially considering Canada's lackluster showing on the world stage. Does Canada even have an ambassador to the UN?

candidone1 wrote:

McGentrix wrote:

No, I was just making a snide comment in retaliation for the baseless insult against our president.

Baseless?
You've got to be kidding me?

What justification do you appeal to then by insulting me, my nationality, my input, or my interest in the United States delgate to the United Nations.

And then candidone1 goes on to answer his/her own question:
It's so typical to lob Canadian or French slander in defense of you prized jerk off for a President. I am thoroughly enjoying watching his little empire and his little conquests crumble with every gaffe that trips out from behind his agonizing face. This President is the biggest joke to the collective international community and you continue to lube your palm and continue stroking.Enjoy yourself on your continued Bush-gratifying endeavors McG. You would do him proud.

Of course none of the preceeding presents a rational base for insulting the American president.

No, I was just making a snide comment in retaliation for the baseless insult against our president.

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

candidone1 wrote:

McGentrix wrote:

No, I was just making a snide comment in retaliation for the baseless insult against our president.

Baseless?
You've got to be kidding me?

What justification do you appeal to then by insulting me, my nationality, my input, or my interest in the United States delgate to the United Nations.

And then candidone1 goes on to answer his/her own question:
It's so typical to lob Canadian or French slander in defense of you prized jerk off for a President. I am thoroughly enjoying watching his little empire and his little conquests crumble with every gaffe that trips out from behind his agonizing face. This President is the biggest joke to the collective international community and you continue to lube your palm and continue stroking.Enjoy yourself on your continued Bush-gratifying endeavors McG. You would do him proud.

Of course none of the preceeding presents a rational base for insulting the American president.

I just find it laughable how eager you all are to pounce in his defence, even in light if everything that has happend under his watch. But, what's a bit 'o lotion without a lot 'o motion huh Finn?
McG didn't employ rationality in his snide comments toward me earlier, I'm just keeping with the times.

Laugh away candi. We neo-cons exist only to amuse our Canuk friends.

What has happened under his watch that I should be joining my friends from the North in ripping him a new a-hole?