1
   

The Most Amazing News About WMD's

 
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 08:37 pm
McG, LOL.. But you just can't point to the particular part? OK.. sure..
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 08:42 pm
You can cut the text from here, when you find it
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 08:42 pm
This is the relevent part of what Iraq was supposed to destroy and stop doing according to 687

Quote:
8. Decides that Iraq shall unconditionally accept the destruction,
removal, or rendering harmless, under international supervision, of:

(a) All chemical and biological weapons and all stocks of agents and all
related subsystems and components and all research, development, support and
manufacturing facilities;

(b) All ballistic missiles with a range greater than 150 kilometres and
related major parts, and repair and production facilities;



Kindly point to which chemical or biological weapons or subsystems or components or research that was found or was ongoing when the US invaded.

Then you can point to the missiles that had the range longer than allowed.
(note - the missiles determined to possibly have range longer than allowed were destroyed by UN before US invaded.)
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2005 10:52 pm
parados wrote:
This is the relevent part of what Iraq was supposed to destroy and stop doing according to 687

Quote:
8. Decides that Iraq shall unconditionally accept the destruction,
removal, or rendering harmless, under international supervision, of:

(a) All chemical and biological weapons and all stocks of agents and all
related subsystems and components and all research, development, support and
manufacturing facilities;

(b) All ballistic missiles with a range greater than 150 kilometres and
related major parts, and repair and production facilities;



Kindly point to which chemical or biological weapons or subsystems or components or research that was found or was ongoing when the US invaded.

Then you can point to the missiles that had the range longer than allowed.
(note - the missiles determined to possibly have range longer than allowed were destroyed by UN before US invaded.)


I would like to know what he did with the weapons and how they were destroyed? Hans Blix said that no nation in the ME keep as good of records as Iraq did, but it's funny how the paper work on the WMD's couldn't be found.

By the way, if it wasn't for the US forcing "inspections" in the first place, Saddam would have plenty of those missiles. He was making them, so what else did he have before inspections started? He had enough time to do something with them and as I noted before, where is the paper work on everything?

Don't forget about the fighter planes we found buried in the desert after the war started. We didn't know they were there and they are a lot larger then 50 gallon drums that could be used to store WMD's.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 07:09 am
Balimo writes:
Quote:

I would like to know what he did with the weapons and how they were destroyed? Hans Blix said that no nation in the ME keep as good of records as Iraq did, but it's funny how the paper work on the WMD's couldn't be found.



I would suggest you go read the UN reports on their destruction. That pretty much details the answers to your question. Your statement shows you haven't bothered to do this yet.

Which particular weapons are you claiming to know exist that have not been accounted for. Provide evidence of the existence then I will be happy to find the evidence of what happened to it.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 07:23 am
You guys remind me of someone who has convinced himself his wife is screwing around on him. You accuse her, she tells you she hasn't. That's not good enough. You hire a private detective. He comes back and says if she's screwing around he hasn't seen it. Not good enough. That just means shes exceptionally sneaky as far as you're concerned. You build it up in your mind and then you black her eye and leave her. So she starts dating someone and you now can say See!!!! I told you she was screwing around.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Apr, 2005 07:23 am
No WMDs found in Iraq: Hans Blix

February 14, 2003 22:25 IST

Hans Blix, executive chairman of the UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission, and Mohamed El-Baradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, updated the Security Council on Friday about the searches carried out in Iraq.

Blix told the council that no weapons of mass destruction were found in the country, but did not rule out the possibility of some existing.

He said the main problem lay in locating such chemical weapons as the deadly VX nerve agent Iraq was known to have had in 1998, which are not on the Iraqi declaration.

"Another matter and one of great significance is that many proscribed weapons and items are not accounted for. One must not jump to the conclusion that they exist. However, that possibility is also not excluded. If they exist, they should be presented for destruction," Blix said.

Blix also reported findings by experts that one of Iraq's new missile systems, Al Samoud-II, exceeds the range limit set by Security Council resolutions.

"The experts concluded that, based on the data provided by Iraq, the two declared variants of the Al Samoud-II missile are capable of exceeding 150km in range. This missile system is therefore proscribed for Iraq," Blix said.

On the Al Fatah missile, Blix said: "The experts found that clarification of the missile data supplied by Iraq is required before the capability of the missile system can be fully assessed."

In a rebuttal of allegations made last week by American Secretary of State Colin Powell, he said, "In no case have we seen convincing evidence that the Iraqi side knew in advance that the inspectors were coming.

"All inspections were performed without notice, and access was almost always provided promptly."

The chief inspector also said that Iraq had accepted an offer to talk to South African experts on disarmament.

While acknowledging that many governmental intelligence agencies are convinced that proscribed weapons, items and programmes exist in Iraq, Blix said the inspectors have to rely on hard evidence.

"Inspectors, for their part, must base their reports only on evidence, which they can, themselves, examine and present publicly. Without evidence, confidence cannot arise," he said.

El-Baradei said Iraq has provided documentation on several outstanding issues, but the documents do not fully clarify the matters.

Hours before the inspectors were to make the presentation, Iraq President Saddam Hussein issued a decree banning the import or production of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.

"Individuals and companies in private and mixed sectors are banned from importing and producing chemical, biological and nuclear weapons," the decree read.

source
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/08/2025 at 01:26:46