1
   

The Most Amazing News About WMD's

 
 
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 07:03 pm
There are none. Weren't any. Good thing that's not why we invaded, or people might think our leaders are lying sacks of ****.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7634313/
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 3,497 • Replies: 86
No top replies

 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 07:05 pm
Any word from our christian leader yet?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 07:07 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
Any word from our christian leader yet?


He's busy making out with the Prince of Saudi Arabia among the bluebonnets. It's a real Hallmark moment.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 07:08 pm
George W Lie? Who would ever believe that ;-)
Laughing
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 07:09 pm
Ah yes, the oil Wink
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 07:16 pm
That ain't what the report - or the MSN article about the report - says at all. The short version is that the questions of what was there when and where and what happened to it remain unresolved.

Notable is the observation which closes the article:
Quote:
"Among unanswered questions, Duelfer said a group formed to investigate whether WMD-related material was shipped out of Iraq before the invasion wasn't able to reach firm conclusions because the security situation limited and later halted their work. Investigators were focusing on transfers from Iraq to Syria.

No information gleaned from questioning Iraqis supported the possibility, one addendum said. The Iraq Survey Group believes "it was unlikely that an official transfer of WMD material from Iraq to Syria took place. However, ISG was unable to rule out unofficial movement of limited WMD-related materials."
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 07:18 pm
The Syrians better take cover ;-)
0 Replies
 
SCoates
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 07:19 pm
Just so you guys know, that stands for "Weapons of mass destruction."

Now things should make a lot more sense for you.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 07:23 pm
Intrepid wrote:
The Syrians better take cover ;-)


I'm sure that thought's crossed some minds in Damascus - and elsewhere.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 07:30 pm
SCoates wrote:
Just so you guys know, that stands for "Weapons of mass destruction."

Now things should make a lot more sense for you.


Huh? Shocked
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 08:08 pm
It helped me.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 08:35 pm
Whoda thunk? Shocked
0 Replies
 
LionTamerX
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 08:42 pm
Cripes !
Does this mean I shoud halt work on the bomb shelter in my back yard ?
0 Replies
 
pragmatic
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 10:21 pm
Intrepid wrote:
George W Lie? Who would ever believe that ;-)
Laughing


Would a proud Canadian like you believe it?

What's the go with the political situation there? I hear the canadian PM/President (??) is being accused of corruption.
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Apr, 2005 12:24 am
Did you mean George W Lie or George W lie? Either way good question Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Apr, 2005 03:02 am
pragmatic wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
George W Lie? Who would ever believe that ;-)
Laughing


Would a proud Canadian like you believe it?

What's the go with the political situation there? I hear the canadian PM/President (??) is being accused of corruption.


Yes, I would believe it!

Which is it? PM or President? Are you asking a specific question? Which news item are you referring to? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
pragmatic
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Apr, 2005 05:00 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Which is it? PM or President? Are you asking a specific question? Which news item are you referring to? Rolling Eyes


Well considering that its not on the news anymore in Australia, it doesn't seem like such a big deal now. Does Canada have both PM and President?
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Apr, 2005 05:23 pm
Didn't you guys know that they shipped all the WMD's to Canada before they could find them?

Get with it people!
0 Replies
 
pragmatic
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Apr, 2005 05:27 pm
Montana wrote:
Didn't you guys know that they shipped all the WMD's to Canada before they could find them?

Get with it people!


they? Who?
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Apr, 2005 06:02 pm
Given that Saddam Hussein was a sworn enemy of Syria's alAssad (Syria backed Iran in the Iran-Iraq war) and that Syrian troops were part of the US-led coalition during Gulf War I, it really doesn't seem likely that the Iraqis would have entrusted their WMDs to the Syrians. That's a red herring, a pretext for possibly attacking Syria next (where, again, no weapons will be found).
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Most Amazing News About WMD's
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/08/2025 at 01:32:43