80
   

If Jesus died to forgive us, then why is there a Hell?

 
 
neologist
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 09:58 am
Frank Apisa wrote:
You are the dancer, Neo.

But best you don't take the challenge....because every time the god of the Bible is on the scene...he is either punishing someone, threatening punishment, killing them, requiring them to kill someone else...and all the other barbaric nonsense I've previously mentioned.

You know you don't have a leg to stand on in this challenge....so you are taking the coward's way out. Pretending you are not dodging....and accusing others of doing the dodging you are doing.

You're a joke, Neo.
Frank, we all deserve to die. What difference does it make how that eventuality comes about? Read my post again, Frank. I more than answered your question. I don't ask you to believe it. Just know it is your answer.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 10:07 am
neologist wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
You are the dancer, Neo.

But best you don't take the challenge....because every time the god of the Bible is on the scene...he is either punishing someone, threatening punishment, killing them, requiring them to kill someone else...and all the other barbaric nonsense I've previously mentioned.

You know you don't have a leg to stand on in this challenge....so you are taking the coward's way out. Pretending you are not dodging....and accusing others of doing the dodging you are doing.

You're a joke, Neo.
Frank, we all deserve to die. What difference does it make how that eventuality comes about? Read my post again, Frank. I more than answered your question. I don't ask you to believe it. Just know it is your answer.



Dance, dance, dance.

The challenge....since you assert your god is a loving, understanding god....is to choose passages from the Bible where the god of the Bible is on the scene....

...with you citing the ones that show the god being loving and understanding....

...and me citing the ones that have the god threatening, killing, requiring killing, bullying, and all that stuff.


Have some spine, Neo.

Acknowledge that you cannot do this because every situation that has the god of the Bible on the scene....the god is being a scumbag.

C'mon. Show a bit of integrity....even if you have to fake it.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 10:54 am
Neologist - You go girl!

I love what you post to Frank in response to his posts.

I see that I am not the only one that Frank calls names (You are a joke Neo). Well, Frank will not have the last laugh, guaranteed.

And, even if you or anyone else were to accept Frank's challenge; it wouldn't matter. I believe he will twist and distort things to continually say you or anyone who believes is wrong.

I don't understand why he just can't find that "maturity" and just flat out say, I don't believe and that's my right and you do believe and that's your right. And just leave it at that.

It would be different if the challenge was offered in the spirit of "maybe we can all learn something here." But, IMO, it is offered to just continue the negative attitude he has been showing.

I know who would win, you know who would win, and Frank, it ain't you!

Deuteronomy 6: Do no test the Lord...

Frank, what part of that don't you get? Satan asked Jesus to do basically the same thing you are challenging and if Jesus wouldn't take him up on the offer, why would a mere mortal?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 02:30 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Neologist - You go girl!

I love what you post to Frank in response to his posts.

I see that I am not the only one that Frank calls names (You are a joke Neo). Well, Frank will not have the last laugh, guaranteed.

And, even if you or anyone else were to accept Frank's challenge; it wouldn't matter. I believe he will twist and distort things to continually say you or anyone who believes is wrong.

I don't understand why he just can't find that "maturity" and just flat out say, I don't believe and that's my right and you do believe and that's your right. And just leave it at that.

It would be different if the challenge was offered in the spirit of "maybe we can all learn something here." But, IMO, it is offered to just continue the negative attitude he has been showing.

I know who would win, you know who would win, and Frank, it ain't you!

Deuteronomy 6: Do no test the Lord...

Frank, what part of that don't you get? Satan asked Jesus to do basically the same thing you are challenging and if Jesus wouldn't take him up on the offer, why would a mere mortal?


Any time either you or Neo wants to actually accept the challenge...I am willing to blow the doors off your car. It will be a laugh for me to do. I guarantee you that much more learned individuals than either of you have accepted the challenge only to leave the discussion with their tails between their legs.

Bring it on...instead of the false bravado.

Cite at least one example of the god of the Bible in a scenario where the thrust is compassion, love, and understanding of the human predicament...and where the god is not punishing, threatening, killing, or asking others to kill.

Should be no big deal for either of you.

You claim the god is loving, understanding, compassionate.

I say the god is murderous, barbaric, constantly threatening and punishing, killing, asking others to kill.

We can easily determine which of us is correct.

So enough with the phony bravado....and on to the game.

If you've got the guts!
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 05:24 pm
Frank,

I cannot speak for Neologist, only myself. I am not going to engage in this challenge you have proposed. So, if you want to take that as a forfeit, fine.

I cited the reason I am not going to engage in the challenge.

I do have to commend you though, your post was written in a very nice way and I do thank you for that.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 05:35 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
I don't think it would matter if God Himself came down and sat in front of you and told you the truth.

I think that if there is a god he/she would be awfully pissed about the depiction provided in the Bible.

Momma Angel wrote:
You asked me a question. I told you I was going to research it. I did. In my opinion and experience, those that do not believe pick apart everything and will use the Bible to twist it to their beliefs, using only the referenced scripture they interpret as backing up their non-belief.

The only twisting going on was by the author of that piece.

Momma Angel wrote:
The fact is this, I believe what the Bible says. I believe it is God-breathed and God inspired. I believe in Jesus Christ as the Savior. I believe He died on the cross to save me from my sins. And I believe He is going to be coming again soon and I am going to be going to be with Him for eternity because that is what He has promised me.

The fear of mortality is a strong motivator for some.
Momma Angel wrote:
I believe that the ways of God are way beyond the understanding of mere mortal man. He's God, how could anyone totally understand something so divine and perfect?

Given that belief, why do you find it so easy to accept mythical stories written thousands of years ago by relatively unsophisticated, realitively unknowledgeable, superstitious ancient Hebrews?(thanks Frank)

Momma Angel wrote:
He is my hope, my salvation, and my joy. And if you don't get it, then you don't get it. But, just because you don't believe you attack with criticizing words. What's up with that? If you feel your position is so strong, why do you feel the need to inject words like "nonsensical blather?" I understood what it said. If you didn't, then you didn't. So what?

I was using words that seemed descriptive of what was written. It was mostly about what someone might wish the Bible said rather than what it does say. Whenever I bring up a specific point about what is written, you pass and go into what you believe.

Momma Angel wrote:
There is one thing I really do not understand about those that do not believe. If, as they say they don't believe, then why in the world do they work so doggone hard to try to prove wrong those of us that do believe?

Surely, you (and others) are not doing it for the believers' welfare.

It is not a matter of proving wrong, it is a matter of education. I suspect that for everyone that posts here there are at least ten lurkers reading the posts, so it is not just you that I am trying to reach. Speaking only for myself, I feel that there is an unhealthy fundamentalist revivalism in this country that is working it's way into our government. www.4religious-right.info

Momma Angel wrote:
And let me say this to you, even the devil knows the Bible. The devil uses Bible scripture himself. Except he perverts and twists it to his own will. And he does that because he thinks he is as good as God, but he isn't. He merely mimics God.

An all powerful God and an all powerful Devil battle for control of our little human minds using a book written thousands of years ago by relatively unsophisticated, realitively unknowledgeable, superstitious ancient Hebrews. Ok, different strokes.

Momma Angel wrote:
Now, I answered your question about resolving the conflict of the Old Testament God and the New Testament God. If you don't like it, then don't accept it.

Yes, you did answer it. I hope you had your fingers crossed when you said there was no difference. Do you think Jesus would have said to stone a man to death for picking up sticks on the Sabbath?
Momma Angel wrote:
And I apologize for not making it easier to read by using paragraphs. And I kind of figured you would have enjoyed that "huge blob of unparagraphed (except for that part of no paragraphs) nonsensical blather since I find your posts a bit hard to read and you seem to relish that. I thought maybe you could at least relate to that part. Laughing

If you find my posts hard to read, I am open to constructive criticism.

Momma Angel wrote:
You cannot take the Bible in parts. You need an understanding of the whole concept. It reminds me of a jury who doesn't get all the pertinent information and is asked to make a judgement. Unless you have a full understanding or are at least willing to listen to it, how do you expect to make any informed decision?

Just a few days ago you remarked that you knew very little about the Old Testament. You refuse to discuss it and yet you speak about full understanding?

Momma Angel wrote:
Now, is there anything else I can clear up for you?

What is your opinion of 1 Corinthians 14:34-35? :wink:
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 05:44 pm
Jesus died to make us feel guilty and hell is for those who don't.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 05:48 pm
According to some verses in the bible, god is jesus and jesus is god. If he died to save humanity, he really wasn't dead in any sense of the word. Once dead, you cannot bring yourself back to life. Even an omnipotent god can't do that. The definition of "dead" has only one meaning. Otherwise, he wasn't dead or he can't possible be god and jesus. So many contradictions. How do they keep all this stuff straight in their brain?
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 05:51 pm
Are you telling me jesus was a zombie.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 06:49 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
According to some verses in the bible, god is jesus and jesus is god. If he died to save humanity, he really wasn't dead in any sense of the word. Once dead, you cannot bring yourself back to life. Even an omnipotent god can't do that. The definition of "dead" has only one meaning. Otherwise, he wasn't dead or he can't possible be god and jesus. So many contradictions. How do they keep all this stuff straight in their brain?
You are listening to trinitarians again, silly.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 06:57 pm
Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:


I think that if there is a god he/she would be awfully pissed about the depiction provided in the Bible.


Considering the Bible is God-Breathed and God-Inspired, I highly doubt that.

Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
The only twisting going on was by the author of that piece.


Your take on that; not mine.

Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
The fear of mortality is a strong motivator for some.


A statement I agree with 100%; however, I am not one of the some.

Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
Given that belief, why do you find it so easy to accept mythical stories written thousands of years ago by relatively unsophisticated, relatively unknowledgeable, superstitious ancient Hebrews? (thats Frank)


You call it mythical, I do not.

Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
I was using words that seemed descriptive of what was written. It was mostly about what someone might wish the Bible said rather than what it does say. Whenever I bring up a specific point about what is written, you pass and go into what you believe.


It is not (IMO) what they wished it said. It is their interpretation of what it said. And your interpretation is different than the one presented.

Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
An all powerful God and an all powerful Devil battle for control of our little human minds using a book....OK, different strokes."


All powerful God, yes. All powerful Devil, no way. Good vs. evil. And, yes, different strokes.

Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
Yes, you did answer it. I hope you had your fingers crossed when you said there was no difference. Do you think Jesus would have said to stone a man to death for picking up sticks on the Sabbath?


No, I don't think He would have. According to Jewish law, an adulteress was to be stoned right? You've heard that story? Well, same thing here, Christ paid the price for those sins by His crucifixion. He probably would have said the same thing he said to the adulteress, "He who has no sin, let him cast the first stone. ...But, as for me, I do not condemn you."

Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
If you find my posts hard to read, I am open to constructive criticism.


No criticism intended. Actually, I quite enjoy your reading style. I just have to look up some of the words to know what they mean. LOL

Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
Just a few days ago you remarked that you knew very little about the Old Testament. You refuse to discuss it and yet you speak about full understanting?


You are right. Very poor choice of words on my part and I apologize. Let's see if I can say what I meant a little better here. Dang it, I know what I believe but this one is hard to put in words. And I am afraid this will be oversimplifying it. God punished for disobeyance of His laws and yes, He punished very harshly, you won't get an argument from me there. He sent His son to be an intercessory for us. Christ took all the sins of the world upon Himself so that man did not have to suffer God's wrath. So, it's like this. God made us, God made the rules, God gave us free will. We know what the punishment is, so if we don't obey the law, we suffer the punishment. But, He gave us a way out. We all sin, but with Christ as our intercessory (if with our free will we choose Christ), we do not suffer the punishment.

Mesquite Wrote:

Quote:
What is your opinion of 1 Corinthians 14:34-35?


You know of the deal about wives submit unto your husbands? Well, most leave out the rest of that. It is ....as your husbands submit unto Christ. This meaning that if a man follows Christ then he will be doing right and his wife should then follow the husband. I totally agree with women not holding high positions in the church. God made women and men to think differently. A woman thinks more with her heart and, as we all know, emotions can cloud any issue. So, that's my opinion.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 07:01 pm
Neologist, you don't believe in the Holy Trinity?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 07:29 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Neologist, you don't believe in the Holy Trinity?
Shocking, eh? The word is not in the bible; and Jesus repeatedly said he was sent by God. Real life and I have been beating each other over the head on this one for a month or more. I am winning, of course. But he won't admit that. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 07:43 pm
If hell disappeared on saturday the church would be empty on sunday.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 07:49 pm
Neologist, yes, rather shocked, but hey, we all believe in different things.

I have been doing some research and I found this concerning the trinity. I am not going to include all of it because it is very extensive. But, this is what I found.

The most difficult thing about the Christian concept of the Trinity is that there is no way to adequately explain it. The Trinity is a concept that is impossible for any human being to fully understand, let alone explain. God is infinitely greater than we are, therefore we should not expect to be able to fully understand Him. The Bible teaches that the Father is God, that Jesus is God, and that the Holy Spirit is God. The Bible also teaches that there is only one God. Though we can understand some facts about the relationship of the different persons of the Trinity to one another, ultimately, it is incomprehensible to the human mind. However, this does not mean it is not true or not based on the teachings of the Bible.

Keep in mind when studying this subject that the word "Trinity" is not used in Scripture. This is a term that is used to attempt to describe the triune God, the fact that there are 3 coexistent, co-eternal persons that make up God. Understand that this is NOT in any way suggesting 3 Gods. The Trinity is 1 God made up of 3 persons. There is nothing wrong with using the term "Trinity" even though the word is not found in the Bible. It is shorter to say the word "Trinity" than to say "3 coexistent, co-eternal persons making up 1 God." If this presents a problem to you, consider this: the word grandfather is not used in the Bible either. Yet, we know there were grandfathers in the Bible. Abraham was the grandfather of Jacob. So don't get hung up on the term "Trinity" itself. What should be of real importance is that the concept that is REPRESENTED by the word "Trinity" does exist in Scripture
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 08:01 pm
Amigo,

Are your comments meant to amuse or are they what you believe?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 08:05 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Amigo,

Are your comments meant to amuse or are they what you believe?
He's spamming in more than one thread.

http://web4.ehost-services.com/el2ton1/spam.gif

And the concept of a triune god originated in Babylon. It is a pagan teaching not supported by the bible.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 08:11 pm
There what I believe.I walk in a preocupied state of constant internal debate. neologist,Is this a no no? I don't want to break the rules Sad
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 08:26 pm
Neologist,

Ok, here is the scripture to go along with that introduction on the trinity.

1) There is one God: Deuteronomy 6:4; 1 Corinthians 8:4; Galatians 3:20; 1 Timothy 2:5.

2) The Trinity consists of three Persons: Genesis 1:1; 1:26; 3:22; 11:7; Isaiah 6:8; 48:16; 61:1; Matthew 3:16-17; Matt 28:19; 2 Corinthians 13:14. In the passages in the Old Testament, a knowledge of Hebrew is helpful. In Genesis 1:1, the plural noun "Elohim" is used. In Genesis 1:26; 3:22; 11:7 and Isaiah 6:8, the plural pronoun for "us" is used. That "Elohim" and "us" refer to more than two is WITHOUT question. In English, you only have two forms, singular and plural. In Hebrew, you have three forms: singular, dual, and plural. Dual is for two ONLY. In Hebrew, the dual form is used for things that come in pairs like eyes, ears, and hands. The word "Elohim" and the pronoun "us" are plural forms - definitely more than two - and must be referring to three or more (Father, Son, Holy Spirit).

In Isaiah 48:16 and 61:1, the Son is speaking while making reference to the Father and the Holy Spirit. Compare Isaiah 61:1 to Luke 4:14-19 to see that it is the Son speaking. Matthew 3:16-17 describes the event of Jesus' baptism. Seen in this is God the Holy Spirit descending on God the Son while God the Father proclaims His pleasure in the Son. Matthew 28:19 and 2 Corinthians 13:14 are examples of 3 distinct persons in the Trinity.

3) The members of the Trinity are distinguished one from another in various passages: In the Old Testament, "LORD" is distinguished from "Lord" (Genesis 19:24; Hosea 1:4). The "LORD" has a "Son" (Psalm 2:7, 12; Proverbs 30:2-4). Spirit is distinguished from the "LORD" (Numbers 27:18) and from "God" (Psalm 51:10-12). God the Son is distinguished from God the Father (Psalm 45:6-7; Hebrews 1:8-9). In the New Testament, John 14:16-17 is where Jesus speaks to the Father about sending a Helper, the Holy Spirit. This shows that Jesus did not consider Himself to be the Father or the Holy Spirit. Consider also all of the other times in the Gospels where Jesus speaks to the Father. Was He speaking to Himself? No. He spoke to another person in the Trinity - the Father.

4) Each member of the Trinity is God: The Father is God: John 6:27; Romans 1:7; 1 Peter 1:2. The Son is God: John 1:1, 14; Romans 9:5; Colossians 2:9; Hebrews 1:8; 1 John 5:20. The Holy Spirit is God: Acts 5:3-4; 1 Corinthians 3:16 (The One who indwells is the Holy Spirit - Romans 8:9; John 14:16-17; Acts 2:1-4).

5) The subordination within the Trinity: Scripture shows that the Holy Spirit is subordinate to the Father and the Son, and the Son is subordinate to the Father. This is an internal relationship, and does not deny the deity of any person of the Trinity. This is simply an area which our finite minds cannot understand concerning the infinite God. Concerning the Son see: Luke 22:42; John 5:36; John 20:21; 1 John 4:14. Concerning the Holy Spirit see: John 14:16; 14:26; 15:26; 16:7 and especially John 16:13-14.

6) The tasks of the individual members of the Trinity: The Father is the ultimate source or cause of: 1) the universe (1 Corinthians 8:6; Revelation 4:11); 2) divine revelation (Revelation 1:1); 3) salvation (John 3:16-17); and 4) Jesus' human works (John 5:17; 14:10). The Father INITIATES all of these things.

The Son is the agent through whom the Father does the following works: 1) the creation and maintenance of the universe (1 Corinthians 8:6; John 1:3; Colossians 1:16-17); 2) divine revelation (John 1:1; Matthew 11:27; John 16:12-15; Revelation 1:1); and 3) salvation (2 Corinthians 5:19; Matthew 1:21; John 4:42). The Father does all these things through the Son, who functions as His agent.

The Holy Spirit is the means by whom the Father does the following works: 1) creation and maintenance of the universe (Genesis 1:2; Job 26:13; Psalm 104:30); 2) divine revelation (John 16:12-15; Ephesians 3:5; 2 Peter 1:21); 3) salvation (John 3:6; Titus 3:5; 1 Peter 1:2); and 4) Jesus' works (Isaiah 61:1; Acts 10:38). Thus the Father does all these things by the power of the Holy Spirit.

None of the popular illustrations are completely accurate descriptions of the Trinity. The egg (or apple) fails in that the shell, white, and yolk are parts of the egg, not the egg in themselves. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are not parts of God, each of them is God. The water illustration is somewhat better but still fails to adequately describe the Trinity. Liquid, vapor, and ice are forms of water. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not forms of God, each of them is God. So, while these illustrations may give us a picture of the Trinity, the picture is not entirely accurate. An infinite God cannot be fully described by a finite illustration. Instead of focusing on the Trinity, try to focus on the fact of God's greatness and infinitely higher nature than our own. "Oh, the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable his judgments, and his paths beyond tracing out! Who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counselor?" (Romans 11:33-34)
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jul, 2005 08:29 pm
Amigo,

I don't think you are breaking the rules. Laughing

But, a constant state of internal debate (i.e., talking to yourself)? I guess that's ok as long as you don't answer yourself!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 07:38:26