Wow, you people wrote a lot since I've last been here!
gospelmancan2 wrote:A number of web sites discounting faith healing does not negate the truth of first hand documented
testimony.
They aren't just websites. They are websites with the titles of scientific studies performed by scientists, published in scientific journals. Each of those links presents the title of the report, the name of the scientific journal, the date it was published, the pages in which you can find the article and sometimes even the abstract giving you a taster of what they did.
Each one of those is a study performed using a large number of people, some over a period of years, done with a strict rigour.
Quote:I know another woman who could barely walk due to a chronic neuro-muscular disease who was healed through prayer and it was medically verified that she no longer had the disease. It should be noted that there are no known cases of this happening in the medical community as this ailment never gets better and ends in
paralysis of the limbs and ultimately death.
If she was medically verified, then she would end up as a case within the medical community. Yet, I see no documentation of this, only your account.
If other people have done studies, citing their methods, you can repeat their studies and find similar answers. If not, then the study is rejected as fraud.
Quote:I have seen crooked legs straighten out after years of being congenitally deformed. I have seen cancerous growths disappear in a second. One second there and the next second gone.
I have personally witnessed hundreds of these cases.
From the same healer? What's he doing in a Church? Send him to hospital where people need him.
Quote:How can this be discounted? Maybe I am lying. I see no motive for me to do so. Maybe they were lying.
Maybe your last sentence has a point.
Quote:I have seen too many before and after cases for that to be the case.
Yet, how can you prove that what you have seen is not a lie, perpetrated by so-called Christian healers that are no more can con-artists, tricking innocent Christians with false promises?
Quote:I would challenge those out there with ailments to pray in the name of Jesus to be healed.
The study has been done before, and it showed no statistically reliable evidence that praying works.
Quote:As for the pronouncements of the scientific community I would submit that they are afraid of what they cannot measure and would discount it. After all, science is only measurement of the natural world and the using of that measurement to further knowledge of properties of the natural universe that already exists. This can and has brought great advances in the physical sphere but cannot be stacked up against spiritual matters.
Isn't it convenient that spiritual matters cannot be defined by science through the way they have been defined by its proponents?
Spiritual matters seemed to fail all those children in one of the reports I linked to, in such a way that the authors started to be very worried by those children who could have been saved had their parents not relied solely on faith healing.
Quote:Any lack of scientific measurement of faith healing is the problem of the scientists and not the problem of those who believe in healing.
Statistics may not be the most perfect science, but it is better than blind faith.
Did I quote the abstract from Hickey & Lyckholm's report where they state that over 200 children in the US have died from treatable illnesses as a result of their parents relying on spiritual healing rather than conventional medical treatment? No? well here's the link to the abstract:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15637946
If all the scientific evidence points in one direction, you cannot ignore it and claim that it is a fault on their behalf.
Quote:I stopped bowing to the great god of science when I realized that Shakespeare was correct in writing
"There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy"
There is no great god of science and anyone that thinks that science is a religion based on dogma is either basing their assumptions on people who shouldn't be scientists in the first place or are ignorant buffoons that know nothing of how science works.
Oh, and real life, you should be more careful with your quotations.
What you've committed right now is what could be classified as plagiarism. To properly quote the Bible, you must quote the Book, the Chapter number and the verse number along with the actual quote itself. It is also far more accepted if you also state the version of the Bible you are quoting from, like this:
Exodus 22:25 (New International Version)
"If you lend money to one of my people among you who is needy, do not be like a moneylender; charge him no interest."