0
   

Should DeLay resign

 
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 12:00 pm
Cycloptichorn
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Here's a hint:

just because your family hasn't progressed much in four generations doesn't mean you have a patent on what it means to be a Republican.

Cycloptichorn


Such a long line of republicans in Tico's family just means that he didn't engage in independent critical thinking.

Baa, baa, baa little sheep.

BBB
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 12:05 pm
Re: Cycloptichorn
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Here's a hint:

just because your family hasn't progressed much in four generations doesn't mean you have a patent on what it means to be a Republican.

Cycloptichorn


Such a long line of republicans in Tico's family just means that he didn't engage in independent critical thinking.

Baa, baa, baa little sheep.

BBB


Do you have a long line of cranky old ladies in your family?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 12:22 pm
Tico
And what were they before they evolved.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 12:26 pm
au, ROFLMAO.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 12:27 pm
BTW, thanks for the good laugh.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 12:31 pm
c.i., after you get up from the floor, can you explain what au is referring to when he says, "they"?

Cranky old ladies?
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 12:35 pm
Tico
What is it about my old age and gender that is so compulsively fascinating to you that you continuously make snide remarks about them?

BBB
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 12:37 pm
tico, Since this seems to be an "inside" joke, we'll just leave it at that. Wink
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 12:38 pm
Re: Tico
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
What is it about my old age and gender that is so compulsively fascinating to you that you continuously make snide remarks about them?

BBB


There is absolutely nothing about your age and gender that is fascinating.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 12:39 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
tico, Since this seems to be an "inside" joke, we'll just leave it at that. Wink


That's too bad ... because I'm sure I had a snappy retort all ready to fire. Oh, well. I'll save it for next time.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 12:41 pm
Tico
Give it some thought it may come to you.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 12:41 pm
No thanks.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 01:18 pm
Tico, You'd be out of character if you didn't. Wink
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 01:48 pm
Any news on Delay's trip to court today?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Nov, 2005 02:13 pm
None that I can find.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Nov, 2005 06:43 am
Quote:
GOP House Leadership Linked Anew to Abramoff
California Rep. John T. Doolittle's use of perks is under scrutiny in the lobbyist investigation.

By Mary Curtius, Times Staff Writer


WASHINGTON ?- His onetime friendship with super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff has come back to haunt Rep. John T. Doolittle of Northern California, a member of the House Republican leadership, as the Justice Department continues its probe into Abramoff's dealings with lawmakers.

Doolittle's name surfaced in the probe when the Washington Post reported late last year that the eight-term congressman from Roseville ?- a Mormon and staunch opponent of casino gambling ?- used Abramoff's luxury sports box in a Washington arena to host a fundraiser and then failed to report its value, as required by law.

The Post pointed to Doolittle's use of Abramoff's skybox as an example of how the lobbyist used such perks to cultivate connections with influential lawmakers as he sought to further the interests of Native American clients who owned casinos. Doolittle subsequently paid back Abramoff's firm for the use of the skybox and reported it on federal disclosure records.

But with Abramoff and his associates the subject of a widening federal investigation into alleged influence-peddling, Doolittle's name surfaced again Friday. A Wall Street Journal article, citing several unnamed sources close to the probe, listed him as one of four lawmakers and more than a dozen former and current Capitol Hill staff members whose links to Abramoff are being looked into.

The other lawmakers were said to be former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Mont.) and Rep. Bob Ney (R-Ohio).
link
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Nov, 2005 07:28 am
Yes indeedy we have the best congress that money can buy.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Nov, 2005 11:01 am
They are all bums (all government elected officials), and we the people are responsible.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Nov, 2005 11:14 am
blatham wrote:
Quote:
GOP House Leadership Linked Anew to Abramoff
California Rep. John T. Doolittle's use of perks is under scrutiny in the lobbyist investigation.

By Mary Curtius, Times Staff Writer


WASHINGTON ?- His onetime friendship with super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff has come back to haunt Rep. John T. Doolittle of Northern California, a member of the House Republican leadership, as the Justice Department continues its probe into Abramoff's dealings with lawmakers.
<snip>

But with Abramoff and his associates the subject of a widening federal investigation into alleged influence-peddling, Doolittle's name surfaced again Friday. A Wall Street Journal article, citing several unnamed sources close to the probe, listed him as one of four lawmakers and more than a dozen former and current Capitol Hill staff members whose links to Abramoff are being looked into.

The other lawmakers were said to be former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Mont.) and Rep. Bob Ney (R-Ohio).
link


I'm feeling a rousing chorus of "will the circle be unbroken" coming on.

The Washington bribery scandal: Caught in a wicked web
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Nov, 2005 11:24 am
bethie

I really would not want to be Scanlon right now.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Should DeLay resign
  3. » Page 32
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/04/2026 at 10:42:58