1
   

Why we are not perfect

 
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 06:52 am
hephzibah wrote:
Quote:
God was treating A&E like those who know the difference between right and wrong/good and evil. God should have realized that knowing good from evil is knowledge. Without that knowledge your ignorant. Ignorant people are easily fooled. A&E were fooled by the serpent because of their ignorance, not because they were mean, disrespectful or deceitful. That's why it was so wrong of God to punish them.

In this story it God who is wrong; God who is guilty of unjust punishment.


xingu,

So are you saying then if your five year old child who ways playing in your front yard started wandering towards the street while you turned away for just a minute, after you'd told him not to go beyond a certain point, you would not punish him?


Ok, would you kick your child out of the house in shame for disobeying you, hephzibah.
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 06:54 am
Real life, can you answer the questions?


"And do you think your 2-year old should've been kicked out of your house when he first ate the cookies you told him not to eat, while you weren't looking? Did you acknowledge that he didn't perceive the concept of obedience like a person who would distinguish right from wrong?"
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 09:01 am
Quote:
Ok, would you kick your child out of the house in shame for disobeying you, hephzibah.


Jason if my child was in a situation that I felt was dangerous I would remove him from the situation because I love him. The situation Adam and Eve were in was dangerous for them because they had disobeyed God and could have then eated from the tree of life which would have caused them to live eternally in a state of disobedience to Him.
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 09:09 am
hephzibah wrote:
Quote:
Ok, would you kick your child out of the house in shame for disobeying you, hephzibah.


Jason if my child was in a situation that I felt was dangerous I would remove him from the situation because I love him.


Is this a "yes" or "no" to my question above?
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 09:14 am
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
Real life, can you answer the questions?


"And do you think your 2-year old should've been kicked out of your house when he first ate the cookies you told him not to eat........?"


Another ridiculous question from JP. Another reason I'm hoping that you don't teach children.

Please assure us that you find employment taking water samples from streams, or running a printing press, or anything far removed from kids. Please?
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 09:23 am
I would reprimand them if the situation merited it. If it was something like say living on a busy street and they were unwilling to listen to my request to not play by the road I would move with them. Or I would put of a fence so they couldn't play by the road.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 09:35 am
Quote:
Well that settles it. Xingu and Jason are smarter than God.


No, not smarter than God but smarter than the God the authors of the Bible created.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 10:11 am
Quote:
xingu,

So are you saying then if your five year old child who ways playing in your front yard started wandering towards the street while you turned away for just a minute, after you'd told him not to go beyond a certain point, you would not punish him?

No, I would not. I would be more responsible and realize that children don't understand the consequences of their actions. I would be more careful and more vigilant. Watching them is my responsibility and my responsibility doesn't end when I say; "Don't do that."

Like A&E children don't have the sense of right and wrong. Unlike A&E children can be taught this.

A&E didn't know right from wrong, period. They could kill 100 people with Uzi's and they would fail to understand what they did was evil. As the Bible said; "Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil:"

Evil is wrong.
Disobeying God is wrong.
Disobeying God is a sin.
Disobeying God is evil.
A&E didn't know evil.
A&E didn't know wrong.

You can't judge A&E actions by your knowledge of good and evil/right from wrong. You have the advantage of knowledge they could not possibly have. Until you are in their position, have their knowledge, or lack of, you can't bring honest judgment on them. All your judgment will be based on your world, your knowledge and your cultural values, not theirs.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 10:30 am
xingu wrote:
.........Like A&E children don't have the sense of right and wrong. Unlike A&E children can be taught this.....



Do you have any idea how ridiculous this sounds, Xingu?
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 12:29 pm
real life wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
Real life, can you answer the questions?


"And do you think your 2-year old should've been kicked out of your house when he first ate the cookies you told him not to eat........?"


Another ridiculous question from JP. Another reason I'm hoping that you don't teach children.

Please assure us that you find employment taking water samples from streams, or running a printing press, or anything far removed from kids. Please?


Stop embarrassing yourself any further and answer the "ridiculous" questions, real.
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 12:39 pm
hephzibah wrote:
I would reprimand them if the situation merited it.


Are you saying that you would do it? It's not clear.

hephzibah wrote:
If it was something like say living on a busy street and they were unwilling to listen to my request to not play by the road I would move with them.


This doesn't make any sense. What are you trying to say by writing "[you] would move with them"?


hephzibah wrote:
Or I would put of a fence so they couldn't play by the road.


And how does this answer the original question?

Can you answer the question with a "yes" or "no" answer?
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 12:49 pm
Jason there is a yes and a no for this particular situation. Yes I would give them a consequence for disobeying me. However, no I would not move them away from me. I would choose to do what I would need to do to protect them. If that was moving out of that neighbor hood I would do that. If it was putting up a fence so they couldn't play by the road, I would do that.
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 12:58 pm
hephzibah wrote:
Jason there is a yes and a no for this particular situation. Yes I would give them a consequence for disobeying me. However, no I would not move them away from me. I would choose to do what I would need to do to protect them. If that was moving out of that neighbor hood I would do that. If it was putting up a fence so they couldn't play by the road, I would do that.


That seems like the rational thing to do from a person who would love her children dearly. But would you recognize that your kids should not be blamed their entire lives for disobeying you when they could not distinguish what was right and what was wrong? (Don't choke on it. It's just a follow-up question.)
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 01:14 pm
Quote:
Do you have any idea how ridiculous this sounds, Xingu?


And why does this sound ridiculous? Children are taught right from wrong. A&E were perfect. They knew no wrong. Wrong came when they ate the apple.

Wrong, evil, bad; that wasn't known to them until the apple feast.

Why do you think A&E ate the apple? Because they were bad? Because they were evil? Because they were disrespectful?

They were none of these. They were ignorant and didn't know, like a child. God was a bad parent. He didn't teach them. He didn't make them understand and he didn't take the necessary precautions to prevent them from eating the apple.

And worse of all, God refused to accept responsibility for his mistakes.
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 02:38 pm
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
hephzibah wrote:
Jason there is a yes and a no for this particular situation. Yes I would give them a consequence for disobeying me. However, no I would not move them away from me. I would choose to do what I would need to do to protect them. If that was moving out of that neighbor hood I would do that. If it was putting up a fence so they couldn't play by the road, I would do that.


That seems like the rational thing to do from a person who would love her children dearly. But would you recognize that your kids should not be blamed their entire lives for disobeying you when they could not distinguish what was right and what was wrong? (Don't choke on it. It's just a follow-up question.)


LOL! The only thing I usually choke on Jason is when other people put words in my mouth! Of course I would. And so does God. That's why He made the yearly sacrifice in the Old Testament and then sent Jesus to be the final sacrifice for all.
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 03:01 pm
hephzibah wrote:


LOL! The only thing I usually choke on Jason is when other people put words in my mouth! Of course I would. And so does God. That's why He made the yearly sacrifice in the Old Testament and then sent Jesus to be the final sacrifice for all.


Apart from such incongruous, tragic account of a book that contains literature compiled from many Babylonians, Greek, Roman, and Hebrew stories, you have a great sense of humor, hephzibah. Keep it up. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 03:20 pm
Thanks Jason. Very Happy So how is it that my account of the bible can be considered inconsistant? (heph ducks...)
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 03:54 pm
hephzibah wrote:
Thanks Jason. Very Happy So how is it that my account of the bible can be considered inconsistant?



The concept of God's son being sent down here to die for the "sins" of humanity is not just inconsistent, but ludicrous. Why didn't God accept an apology from us humans. Why did He have to send His own son to die on the cross? How is that forgiveness? And the concept of three gods in one, that just pushing the absurdity.

And as you have noticed, God has quite the meaningless,mass murderous, killing fetish in the Old Testament.



hephzibah wrote:
(heph ducks...)


That was cute.
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 04:09 pm
Well Jason if there is one thing I've figured out it's that when someone is completely and utterly convinced that something just IS a certain way it doesn't matter how much information anyone gives it will never be enough. The true intent of what is being said cannot be seen because person being talked to only see's their side of it. Which is why there's certain topics I don't broach here. :wink: I just let people be and believe what they want. I figure if they're really that interested in what I have to say about certain things they can ask me. I'll give them an honest answer and if they believe it great! And if not I'll just have to karate chop them! LOL Just kidding... If they don't it's all good. No harm no foul. Smile
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 04:28 pm
xingu wrote:
Quote:
Do you have any idea how ridiculous this sounds, Xingu?


And why does this sound ridiculous? Children are taught right from wrong. A&E were perfect. They knew no wrong. Wrong came when they ate the apple.

Wrong, evil, bad; that wasn't known to them until the apple feast.

Why do you think A&E ate the apple? Because they were bad? Because they were evil? Because they were disrespectful?

They were none of these. They were ignorant and didn't know, like a child. God was a bad parent. He didn't teach them. He didn't make them understand and he didn't take the necessary precautions to prevent them from eating the apple.

And worse of all, God refused to accept responsibility for his mistakes.


Eve's response to the serpent shows clearly that they did know the Tree was off limits. They were not ignorant.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/11/2025 at 03:49:12