neologist wrote:He undoubtedly hoped that God would either be forced to forgive Adam and Eve's sin or destroy them outright. Either course would have been a defeat of God's purpose.
Instead God allowed the rebellion to continue. He gave Satan (what seems to us an interminable) time to prove his implied charges: that God did not have the right to set standards; that mankind would be better off charting their own course;and that humans would only serve God out of selfishness.
The problem here is that people take Jewish creation myths as a reliable source of information about God's attributes.
Do you honestly believe in talking snakes, magical fruit, flaming swords guarding a mythical garden, and a god who would punish billions of people for one act of disobedience by their distant ancestors who had no knowledge of good or evil at the time? Do you believe that this god drowned millions of men, women and children for not meeting his standards instead of correcting the imperfections with which he endowed them?
Yes, mankind would be far better charting their own course than continuing to rely on ancient myths and serving the Biblical God (who, IMO, was unethical, capricious, vain, and cruel. If there is a God who created everything, he obviously is not perfect. You cannot blame sinful human beings for the flaws inherent in creation.