1
   

Florida to end "leftist totalitarianism" by "dictator profs"

 
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 01:45 am
DrewDad wrote:
When did conservatives get to be such cry-babies?


http://bank.fiolex.net/free.en/themes/baby/crd030803.jpg

Official Seal of The Young Republicans Student Union


"whhaaaaaa!!!! daddd-dddy, my professor is a, a, a li-be-raaallll!!! "

Laughing
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 07:03 am
A closed mind is a sad thing. I don't particularly care if you rock up to class with your mind locked into a Leftist or a Rightist mode. If you turn up at class seeking only to have your beliefs confirmed then you're wasting your time. Take another class. Leave your comfortably closed mind alone. Let it suppurate.

If you have the courage to try to consider new ideas then before you do anything read Milton's Areopagitica and ready it carefully. Get a print version with the notes attached, it's better because Milton had a brilliant classical education and he shows off in the Areopagitica so it's handy to have those footnotes.

But also read it in the knowledge that when Milton wrote and delivered this wonderful speech in the defence of free speech and against the licensing (restriction) of printers that he only wanted freedom of speech and publication for those who weren't Catholics.

Then ask yourself if the most powerful speech in the English language in the defence of free speech is actually an exercise in hypocrisy.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 07:39 am
Welcome to A2K, Brandy.

Brandy wrote:
Well here I go. My first post. I read it all and would it be safe to say those who are of the more liberal persuasion see no problem on college campuses? Or is it campi?

It is not that there are no problems, it is that
a) there are already corrective mechanisms in place and,
b) IMO the proposed legislation would cause more proplems than it would solve.

Brandy wrote:
Chiczaira was quite right that in most colleges these days the student who wants a top grade better know the professor's politics before he or she writes his first paper.

This has been true since Gallileo's time, and before.

Brandy wrote:
Music, fine arts, some of the math and sciences are pretty apolitical. But in any of the liberal arts curriculum, there is little room or support for any student with right leaning views. Of course students with no views at all don't notice nor do those who already think left. I had to learn the hard way.

There are places where one does not have to do this.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 07:43 am
chiczaira wrote:
When did c`onservatives get to be such crybabies ?says Drew Dad.case

Apparently Drew Dad does not know that the case reported by Nat Hentoff about gay and lesbian students at NYU objecting to a moot court exercise which covered a case of a divorced father vis a vis his lesbian wife----because their "feelings" would be hurt, is "crybabyism" raised to the highest level.

No, I read your post. I just don't find it persuasive.

What happened to market forces that will lead to corrections if the supply no longer meets the needs of consumers? Isn't that a conservative belief?
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 08:15 am
FreeDuck wrote:
DontTreadOnMe wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
I'm a guy. I liberally banged as many liberal women as I could in college. Gave them up when I got back to reality.


now that is a sterling example of conservative "values". :wink:


Especially when you start adding up all the abortions he had to pay for when he knocked them all up.


He didnt have to pay for any.
Its HER body,so if she wants an abortion,let her pay for it.
She chose to have sex,remember.


Having said that,I think this bill is stupid,and I'm a conservative.
Yes,there are examples where students have paid for disagreeing with there prof,but that happens in every college,to both libs and conservatives.
This bill is a stupid waste of time and money,IMO.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 08:49 am
The problem here is the litigation that will come about when ever someone's beliefs are challenged. Imagine a world in which the courts decide what is real science and what is not.

The unintended consequences here for the authors of this bill is that their beliefs may be declared to be not science and therefor not protected or even allowed in a college course. Those darn educated "activist" judges will rule against them every time because the judges were all trained at "liberal" law schools. (The scientific method is pretty well established as the standard for deciding what is science.) Just think if the courts declare it is OK to flunk someone for having creationist beliefs in a course on biology. It would be a major blow to the conservative movement.

I guess the failure to think through what could happen if they do pass their bill shows why conservatives need a liberal education.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 10:10 am
I can understand the thinking behind the bill,but I dont agree with it.

Let me give you an example...
I am a veteran of both the gulf war AND the current Iraq war,and am also a student at our local community college.
My history professor was talking about the gulf war,and was blaming the US for the war.
According to my professor,the Us instigated that war,and the crimes committed on the people of Kuwait by the Iraqi's didnt happen.
I objected,because I was with the first troops into Kuwait City,with the marines,and I SAW what the Iraqi's had done to the citizens of Kuwait.

When I objected,he basically told me that I was a liar and threw me out of his class.When I complained,his response was that I was "interupting his lesson plan by denying the facts"

When I replied that I was there and saw the truth,he dismissed me as being biased and pro war.

So,I am proof that there are some professors that dont want to hear anything that disrupts their own pet theories,but teachers of all political persuasions do it,not just liberals.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 10:25 am
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8427-2005Mar28.html?nav=rss_politics
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 10:50 am
chiczaira wrote:
I am very much afraid that Mr. Blatham(who says he has never heard of a professor trying to force an idea on to a student) is not aware of the more sophisticated ploys. So called "freedom of speech" does not exist if it offends the "feelings" of some on the left. "Rednecks"; Fundamentalists, People who live in the "red states"; People who live in "flyover country" are all fair game..but......as Nat Hentoff( a longtime defender of freedom of speech for all reports:

quote: "At most colleges, it is the administration that sets up the code. Because there have been racist or sexist or homophobic tuants, anonymous notes or graffiti, the administration feels it must do something. The cheapest quickest way to demonstrate that it cares is to appear to suppress racist, sexist homophobic speech"


And how is this done?

Hentoff reports:

"Students at NYULaw School have said that they have had to censor themsleves in class. The kind of chilling atmosphere they describe was exemplified in a case assigned for a moot court competition which became subject to denunciation when a sizeable number of law students said it was too "offensive" and would hurt the feelings of gay and lesbian students. The case concerned a divorced father's attempt to gain custody of his children on the grounds that the mother had become a lesbian. It was against PC to represent the father."

Perhaps Mr.Blatham would like to hear of more documented cases of the left's almost complete hegemony over the world of ideas in our major universities. Free Speech is the prerogative of the PC world of the left.

Conservative ideas are anathema in most of our most influential Universities.


Let us speak of first-hand knowledge. Please detail for the rest of us here your own university experience...how many years, which universities, and the instances you personally experienced of enforced bias.

Because I will wager that, like everyone else on this board who has forwarded this claim of massive liberal bias on campus, you have no or very little personal experience regarding that of which you speak.

In contrast, the folks here who actually have spent significant time at universities relate experiences which contradict the claims of folks like Hentoff and Horowitz, via sites such as townhall or via such unbiased voices as Rush Limbaugh.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 10:53 am
El-Diablo wrote:
Sure FAU Boca Campus
Mr Brooks first name is William
the class is Biology Prinicples

He's not really controversial or anything adn he knows his stuff he jsut gets a little boiled over on certain politcal issues. So please dont do something rash about it lol (like file a complaint). He gave us his phone number but I never wrote it down because I'm not big on contacting teachers.

I'm only doin this because you seem to be attacking my credibility. Shocked


I am questioning the carefulness of your sentences. 50% cannot be accurate. His principle or administrator would be down his throat in a jiffy because he would not be teaching biology, which is his role and his job.

When we get careless in that manner when we write and speak, discussion of real value is not possible.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 10:56 am
Brandy wrote:
Well here I go. My first post. I read it all and would it be safe to say those who are of the more liberal persuasion see no problem on college campuses? Or is it campi?

Chiczaira was quite right that in most colleges these days the student who wants a top grade better know the professor's politics before he or she writes his first paper. Music, fine arts, some of the math and sciences are pretty apolitical. But in any of the liberal arts curriculum, there is little room or support for any student with right leaning views. Of course students with no views at all don't notice nor do those who already think left. I had to learn the hard way.


Please give full details. Which courses taken, how many, any and all instances of down-marking or whatever that you claim.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 11:01 am
goodfielder said
Quote:
A closed mind is a sad thing. I don't particularly care if you rock up to class with your mind locked into a Leftist or a Rightist mode. If you turn up at class seeking only to have your beliefs confirmed then you're wasting your time. Take another class. Leave your comfortably closed mind alone. Let it suppurate.


This is it. Learning very often is not a matter of adding data, but of unlearning. It is very often hard work. If you think your ideas, however cherished, will not be challenged or ought not to be challenged, then go somewhere other than university.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 11:08 am
mysteryman wrote:
I can understand the thinking behind the bill,but I dont agree with it.

Let me give you an example...
I am a veteran of both the gulf war AND the current Iraq war,and am also a student at our local community college.
My history professor was talking about the gulf war,and was blaming the US for the war.
According to my professor,the Us instigated that war,and the crimes committed on the people of Kuwait by the Iraqi's didnt happen.
I objected,because I was with the first troops into Kuwait City,with the marines,and I SAW what the Iraqi's had done to the citizens of Kuwait.

When I objected,he basically told me that I was a liar and threw me out of his class.When I complained,his response was that I was "interupting his lesson plan by denying the facts"

When I replied that I was there and saw the truth,he dismissed me as being biased and pro war.

So,I am proof that there are some professors that dont want to hear anything that disrupts their own pet theories,but teachers of all political persuasions do it,not just liberals.


Now that is a good and balanced post, mm.

But I really think you ought to have gone to the department head and given him/her a report on what this prof did. I think you ought to do it even now. Removal from a class because of a disagreement (on any matter of a difference in opinion) is educationally unacceptable and most institutions will not abide a professor acting in this manner if they are made aware of it.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 11:14 am
mystery man you won't find a liberal in this forum that applauds that type of teaching. That teacher is wrong and should be censured.
The point I want to make is that there are bad teachers on both sides of the aisles. Let the school administrations police their staff...don't enact more legislation for more torts
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 11:22 am
blatham wrote:
Let us speak of first-hand knowledge. Please detail for the rest of us here your own university experience...how many years, which universities, and the instances you personally experienced of enforced bias.

You didn't ask me, but here are my experiences, speaking as a former student at the Ludwig Maximilians Universität in Munich, Germany. All of the following events happened in Munich while I was there.

1) One of our best behavioral biologists, Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeld, held views on the 'nature vs. nurture' debate that are closer to the 'nature' side than some feminist and socialist campus activists were willing to tolerate. So those activists picketed his lectures and booed him down on a regular basis (I'd say about three times per semester.) University management never stepped in to protect his right to teach behavioral biology as he sees fit.

2) At the Geschwister Scholl Institute, one assistant professor (in American terms) downplayed the crimes of the Nazis and exaggerated the faults of the resistance movements. He was mobbed out of his position. The guy, whose name I don't remember, was a jerk, and I didn't lose any sleep about his departure, but that's not why he had to go. He had to go because he held a view that was radically out of the scientific mainstream, in a direction that's extremely unpopular in Germany for good historic reasons.

3) At a neighbor university, Michael Wolffsohn, a historian, frequently expresses ultra-conservative views about the ethics of war and law enforcement -- and his alma mater frequently consideres firing him for it. The latest round came in 2004 (I was out of college by then), when he said in an interview that he sometimes considers torture a legitimate means of gathering information. Again, I think he is grossly mistaken. But academic freedom isn't about protecting views we like -- it's about protecting views we hate, because those are the views that need protection in the first place. Wolffsohn still has his job -- but it's been several close shaves.

4) I have frequently heard professors in the humanities make comparable errors in the other direction: Downplaying the horrors of the Soviet Gulag; arguing that power plants are a legitimate target of civil disobedience, even armed resistance; erring by a ridiculously wide margin on the "nurture" side; attacking the practice that murderers with a life sentence usually get out of prison after 20 years in Germany, on the grounds that 20 years is too long for a "life sentence". Nothing ever happened to them. Not even a catcall.

I agree, though, that the Florida bill is a horrible idea. It is hard to see how the state would increase academic freedom, rather than decreasing it, by regulating what professors can say in their lectures.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 11:24 am
panzade wrote:
mystery man you won't find a liberal in this forum that applauds that type of teaching. That teacher is wrong and should be censured.
The point I want to make is that there are bad teachers on both sides of the aisles. Let the school administrations police their staff...don't enact more legislation for more torts


FYI,I'm agreeing with you.
I just wanted to show that it does happen.
The professor in question is a liberal.BUT,I have said that both sides have professors that do it,not just one.

Blatham,
I did go to the dept head.
After talking to him,I now have a different professor,and the first one has been disciplined by the school.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 11:56 am
Quote:
Blatham,
I did go to the dept head.
After talking to him,I now have a different professor,and the first one has been disciplined by the school.


Well done.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 12:36 pm
Thomas wrote:
blatham wrote:
Let us speak of first-hand knowledge. Please detail for the rest of us here your own university experience...how many years, which universities, and the instances you personally experienced of enforced bias.

You didn't ask me, but here are my experiences, speaking as a former student at the Ludwig Maximilians Universität in Munich, Germany. All of the following events happened in Munich while I was there.

1) One of our best behavioral biologists, Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeld, held views on the 'nature vs. nurture' debate that are closer to the 'nature' side than some feminist and socialist campus activists were willing to tolerate. So those activists picketed his lectures and booed him down on a regular basis (I'd say about three times per semester.) University management never stepped in to protect his right to teach behavioral biology as he sees fit.

2) At the Geschwister Scholl Institute, one assistant professor (in American terms) downplayed the crimes of the Nazis and exaggerated the faults of the resistance movements. He was mobbed out of his position. The guy, whose name I don't remember, was a jerk, and I didn't lose any sleep about his departure, but that's not why he had to go. He had to go because he held a view that was radically out of the scientific mainstream, in a direction that's extremely unpopular in Germany for good historic reasons.

3) At a neighbor university, Michael Wolffsohn, a historian, frequently expresses ultra-conservative views about the ethics of war and law enforcement -- and his alma mater frequently consideres firing him for it. The latest round came in 2004 (I was out of college by then), when he said in an interview that he sometimes considers torture a legitimate means of gathering information. Again, I think he is grossly mistaken. But academic freedom isn't about protecting views we like -- it's about protecting views we hate, because those are the views that need protection in the first place. Wolffsohn still has his job -- but it's been several close shaves.

4) I have frequently heard professors in the humanities make comparable errors in the other direction: Downplaying the horrors of the Soviet Gulag; arguing that power plants are a legitimate target of civil disobedience, even armed resistance; erring by a ridiculously wide margin on the "nurture" side; attacking the practice that murderers with a life sentence usually get out of prison after 20 years in Germany, on the grounds that 20 years is too long for a "life sentence". Nothing ever happened to them. Not even a catcall.

I agree, though, that the Florida bill is a horrible idea. It is hard to see how the state would increase academic freedom, rather than decreasing it, by regulating what professors can say in their lectures.


thomas

Thanks. It seems rather clear to me, where free speech is valued and given wide lattitude, that some proportion of the ideas voiced will be nutty/fascist/dogmatically leftist...the full spectrum. Equally certain is it that such free expression of opinion will garner protests, often emotional. I know we both cherish either event though often personally disagreeing with the content of the opinions voiced and those strategies for advancing personal views which are effectively oppressive of free speech (booing to inhibit, attempts to prohibit a speaker from appearing, etc).

What I am attempting to do on these education threads when they appear is to demonstrate a couple of things.

One: to point out that the claims advanced by Horowitz and crowd very seriously misrepresent reality. For example, I know that you have spent a significant number of years at universities. This would entail many thousands of personal interactions with professors and being witness to many thousands of interactions between professors and others. Yet the questionable instances are four, and they are not all instances of liberal bias as Horowitz promotes. This is the pattern for everyone on this board (and everyone I know) who has attended university. Almost without exception, the claims of vast liberal bias are made here by folks who have not attended university.

Two: the above poses the question of why is it that these people forwarding the Horowitz claims here believe those claims - believe that there is the sort of liberal bias leading to student oppression that Horowitz says is the case. To answer this is not terribly difficult. They are reading the same sources or listening to the same radio shows or watching the same pundits. As advertisers understand (and as Horowitz et al understand) repeated claims, particularly from apparently diverse sources, can bring about the assumption that what is heard is true. Blondes have more fun.

Whether these folks are predisposed to assume the worst about universities is another interesting question, but well answered by Hofstadter in Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. I am sure you recognize the populist fervor presently being fed in the US by some portion of the conservative element which is anti-intellectual and very certainly anti-liberal (or at least anti what they assume liberalism to be or represent or value).

Three: that the agenda of Horowitz and crowd is not really what is claimed. The modern conservative right in America is engaged in a multi-pronged strategy to disempower the democratic party specifically, and more generally, to invalidate and turn back the tide of liberalism (again, what they conceive that to be). Universities are almost always a dynamic force in the community which contend - by the nature of their task - against tradition. When totalitarian governments take over, they always (and that is pretty close to an absolute) head right for the universities to begin their purges, though they might briefly stop enroute to cut the throats of union leaders.

Four: that the above factors are presently being strengthened or made more acute by the increased power of the radical christian right in Republican Party politics and thus, in the power structures of the US. The following piece from todays NY Times, by chairman of the physics department at Case Western Reserve University speaks to this last point...
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/29/science/29comm.html?
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 12:39 pm
mysteryman wrote:
I can understand the thinking behind the bill,but I dont agree with it.


i'm with ya, mysteryman. it will just further muddy up already murky waters. and tie up the courts with more frivolous lawsuits.

mysteryman wrote:
So,I am proof that there are some professors that dont want to hear anything that disrupts their own pet theories,but teachers of all political persuasions do it,not just liberals.


good. i was hoping that someone right of center would bring this up. being a more centrist type, i've gotten it from both sides over the years. i'm thinking that the "political" angle here is secondary to the fact that there are some people in the world that are control freaks, or at least, plain old fashioned self important. ya find them everywhere, so it's not that strange to come up against it in school. best to get used to it, because it doesn't end when you graduate.

and thanks, btw, for your time during gulf I (which i supported) and iraq (which i didn't, but hope it turns out well).

ya know, it might be a good thing if guys like you did a thread here to share your thoughts on iraq. having been there, it would be refreshing to get it from the horse's mouth instead of the talking heads for a change.
:wink:
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 12:44 pm
DTOM,
I have tried to tell people what went on when I was there.
The common response is..."well yeah,but that is only where you were,what about the rest"?

or,"yea,but you are an unwitting pawn and dont really know"

It seems that most people that are against the war dont want to hear anything about the good that is being done,the bravery of our soldiers,or anything else that doesnt jibe with their own skewed view.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 05:22:29