blatham wrote: Let us speak of first-hand knowledge. Please detail for the rest of us here your own university experience...how many years, which universities, and the instances you personally experienced of enforced bias.
You didn't ask me, but here are my experiences, speaking as a former student at the Ludwig Maximilians Universität in Munich, Germany. All of the following events happened in Munich while I was there.
1) One of our best behavioral biologists, Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeld, held views on the 'nature vs. nurture' debate that are closer to the 'nature' side than some feminist and socialist campus activists were willing to tolerate. So those activists picketed his lectures and booed him down on a regular basis (I'd say about three times per semester.) University management never stepped in to protect his right to teach behavioral biology as he sees fit.
2) At the
Geschwister Scholl Institute, one assistant professor (in American terms) downplayed the crimes of the Nazis and exaggerated the faults of the resistance movements. He was mobbed out of his position. The guy, whose name I don't remember, was a jerk, and I didn't lose any sleep about his departure, but that's not why he had to go. He had to go because he held a view that was radically out of the scientific mainstream, in a direction that's extremely unpopular in Germany for good historic reasons.
3) At a neighbor university, Michael Wolffsohn, a historian, frequently expresses ultra-conservative views about the ethics of war and law enforcement -- and his alma mater frequently consideres firing him for it. The latest round came in 2004 (I was out of college by then), when he said in an interview that he sometimes considers torture a legitimate means of gathering information. Again, I think he is grossly mistaken. But academic freedom isn't about protecting views we like -- it's about protecting views we
hate, because those are the views that need protection in the first place. Wolffsohn still has his job -- but it's been several close shaves.
4) I have frequently heard professors in the humanities make comparable errors in the other direction: Downplaying the horrors of the Soviet Gulag; arguing that power plants are a legitimate target of civil disobedience, even armed resistance; erring by a ridiculously wide margin on the "nurture" side; attacking the practice that murderers with a life sentence usually get out of prison after 20 years in Germany, on the grounds that 20 years is
too long for a "life sentence". Nothing ever happened to them. Not even a catcall.
I agree, though, that the Florida bill is a horrible idea. It is hard to see how the state would
increase academic freedom, rather than decreasing it, by regulating what professors can say in their lectures.