Florida to end "leftist totalitarianism" by "dictator profs"

blatham wrote:

I'm afraid, thomas, that your personal suppositions and optimisms regarding humans in community here do not compel me.

"Where two people agree, one of them is superfluous." (Winston Churchill) How nice that neither of us is superfluous. Let's just revisit this thread in 10 years and see who was right.

What, I don't get to be "Mr. DrewDad?"

I posted my opinions. Instead of meaningless commentary, try to take some of my opinions apart. Show, with evidence, of course, that the opinions are mistaken. Can you do it?

I write damn good papers. So upon receiving a less than passing grade and 'naive and incomplete" written on the cover page, I went to the professor for an explanation.

My experiences at the University of Chicago taught me that African-Americans do not committ crimes, or if they do, that fact is not to be mentioned in a Sociology or History class.

Mr. Blatham is obviously unaware that the left wing liberals in our Universities in the USA teach all kinds of twaddle which is designed for the purposes of Political Correctness but, in reality, is nothing but the perversion of History.

This idiocy and violation of the First Amendment was struck down in Federal Court. The US District Judge Avern Cohn declared that "The Supreme Court has consistently held that states punishing speech or conduct on the grounds that they are unseemly or offensive are unconstitutionally overbroad.

This is only the tip of the iceberg.

I know the Pope claims to speak "ex Cathedra" I was unaware that Mr. Blathman did so also.

First of all, I mentioned that MY experiences at the University of Chicago were such that I did not hear that African-Americans did not committ crimes OR IF THEY DID, that fact was not to be mentioned in a HIstory or Sociology Class.

Mr. Blatham does not, evidently, watch Television or go to the Movies

I will, of course, accept Mr. Blatham's claim about D"Sousa, if Mr. Blatham can document it.

Of course, if one relies on anecdotal evidence, as Mr. Blatham suggests some do, then that evidence could be called an experience one has read about. I suggest that the above are not experiences one has read about but are facts.

The New PC: Crybaby Conservatives


The Yale student did not like what he heard. Sociologists derided religion and economists damned corporations. One professor pre-emptively rejected the suggestion that "workers on public relief be denied the franchise." "I propose, simply, to expose," wrote the young author in a booklong denunciation, one of "the most extraordinary incongruities of our time. Under the "protective label 'academic freedom,'" the institution that derives its "moral and financial support from Christian individualists then addresses itself to the task of persuading the sons of these supporters to be atheistic socialists."

Chic is a conservative.. ergo.. Chic is afflicted with dementia.

Based on your attempts to engage others in debate here chic, I can see precisely why the professor stated such. Your arguments are not well thought out. You use personal experience as if it was applicable to the entire world. You bluster and resort to ad hominem attacks when questioned or refuted.

...I indicated that MY experiences at the University of Chicago taught me that African-Americans did not commit crimes....

...When I took four classes at the University of Chicago and found that African-Americans were not really criminals but people who were practically forced to turn to crime ...

I am very much afraid, Parados, that you start off by putting both of your feet firmly in your mouth. I did not write--"i write damn good papers". You began with an egregious mistake and went downhill rapidly.

You are obviously unused to discretionary phraseology. I indicated that MY experiences at the University of Chicago taught me that African-Americans did not commit crimes.... When I took four classes at the University of Chicago and found that African-Americans were not really criminals but people who were practically forced to turn to crime because we, the rest of the country, had crushed them under our heels for three centuries,

No facts in evidence says Parados-

This is only the tip of the iceberg. In today's US Universities, you are not allowed to espouse conservative ideas but must regurgitate the left wing pieties of the radical professors. You must remember, goodfielder, that many of today's professors came from the left wing movementsof the sixties and seventies.

Does Parados know what a fraud this is? If not, I can tell him.

The statement that the commentary I made about the Michigan Case was incomplete in its "argument and conclusion" is absurd. ...3. THE COURT STRUCK DOWN THE ENTIRE MICHIGAN POLICY AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

I am very much afraid that the claims of "adhominem" will not stand scrutiny when compared with the insulting personal attacks made by Blatham--"

This bill won't increase the number of lawyers in the country. It will simply move some of them from less productive activities into an area in which their services are actually needed.

I thought this was interesting"

http://www.alternet.org/story/21715/

Quote:

The New PC: Crybaby Conservatives


The Yale student did not like what he heard. Sociologists derided religion and economists damned corporations. One professor pre-emptively rejected the suggestion that "workers on public relief be denied the franchise." "I propose, simply, to expose," wrote the young author in a booklong denunciation, one of "the most extraordinary incongruities of our time. Under the "protective label 'academic freedom,'" the institution that derives its "moral and financial support from Christian individualists then addresses itself to the task of persuading the sons of these supporters to be atheistic socialists."

That's the first paragraph. I won't put it all here.