Dubya

And what if the U.S. Army succeeds to capture Saddam, dead or alive? Who is to be praised for this?

Dead or alive ....
We have the finest Army in the world, my youngest served in Desert Storm .... it looks like another nightmare of worry is going to become surreal as he still serves his country.

We have the absolute poorest leader on the face of the earth ... the world knows that.

Why is it a must that we disarm terrorist? Obviously 9/11 demonstrated that if you want to kill you don't need a bomb or bacteria!!

A razor blade can become a weapon of mass destruction ......

The problems are here at home .... no one cares enough to think.

The answer never was and never will be war!
1991, 2003, ????

WAKE UP AMERICA ..... PLEASE WAKE UP

My wish is that somehow we could get the message understood by Dubya and his administration that there are gross overreactions going on and that they are scaring the hell out of us.

Dubya is hell bent for war. Nothing will stop him. Not the UN or our supposed allies nor the people both here and abroad. Mr. Bush is busily trying to repeal our civil rights. And all this based upon the mandate and overwhelming vote he received from the electorate. And above all his wealth of military experience. AWOL.

"Cry me a river and I'll cry a river over you".

As Mandel points out, the latest initiative packs a real punch for his country's parliamentarians. "Our governments are planning to commit nothing short of mass murder. They're planning to kill Iraqi civilians without any lawful justification or excuse," he argues. "That's a crime in England and in Canada and under international law."




http://www.the-lawyer.co.uk/lawyernews/article.asp?id=43855

Go, Bush baby! You're da man!

Did you know that...
because the bush baby's call sounds like the shouts of an exited child, British explorers thus named it its English name.
Some African tribes catch bush babies by leaving out saucers of palm wine for them to drink.
the longest recorded leap by a bush baby from one tree to another was 23 feet.
"Galago" is another term for Bush Babies.

The voice of the imperialist faction .... speak o vessel of wisdom ....

Sorry, that was intended for mr. raven

This is all so hard to contemplate....I think that is a topic for a different discussion though.

Cynics might argue that it is understandable that George W. Bush can't tell the difference between a democracy and a puppet government.

After all, Bush was installed as president -- despite having lost the election by more than a half a million votes -- by a 5-4 vote instigated by a partisan hack Supreme Court Justice who thinks he is a judicial agent of God (we're talking about Antonin Scalia here). Bush's presidential "appointment" was the crowning culmination of a long-term right wing strategy aimed at controlling America through packing the courts and hijacking the electoral process.

Just as the Bush Cartel is going to seize the second largest oil fields and colonize the Middle East -- Hell or high water -- the right wing extremists were going to place their puppet in the White House in 2000 no matter what it took.

In his February 26th speech at the right wing American Enterprise Institute -- with the Stalinist John Ashcroft at his side -- Bush read carefully crafted remarks that were meant to tug at the love Americans have for our memory of when we were a democracy (before Bush, before the 6 year attempt to impeach Bill Clinton, before election 2000, before the KGB reign of John Ashcroft). Among the many hot button appeals to our heritage as a democracy, he declared, "Success in Iraq could begin a new stage for Middle Eastern peace, and set in motion progress towards a truly democratic Palestinian state." (see http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7505-2003Feb26.html ) That sentence is a key example of the latest fraudulent Bush marketing message aimed at selling the Iraq war.

After all, the Bush Cartel would never allow the uncertainty of outcomes that true democratic elections (outside of Israel) might offer in the Middle East.

Rest here.

Will you all be crying again in 2004, when President Bush goes back to the White House?

What would you like to wager on that, NH? :wink:

Boo-Hoo! I won't cry over you!

Let's hope one of us has a world to cry over:

The Bush administration continues to insist that developments in North Korea do not constitute a crisis. Well, here's how things stand. North Korea has announced that it will restart its nuclear reactor at Yongbyon, which would mean the ongoing production of plutonium, the key ingredient in a nuclear bomb.

Worse, it appears be on the verge of moving its existing fuel rods away from the reactor, where it could extract enough weapons-grade plutonium to make six nuclear bombs. Once this happens the plutonium will be untouchable: out of sight of any future inspectors and out of reach of a military strike. It will almost certainly be on the open market because North Korea sells everything it can to anyone who will pay. And once reprocessed, plutonium is forever. It's half-life is 24,400 years. If we don't stop this chain of events right now, this stuff will be out there somewhere to haunt our children and grandchildren.

The administration is right, this is not a crisis.

It's a catastrophe.

MSNBC

PDiddie
Please remember we mustn't insult our fellow a2k'ers no matter how justified.

I was just going to add that comment, au, and direct it to NH, who is not adding or contributing to the discussion here. We are all tense and easy to fly off the handle at times. We must strive for discipline in our posted words.

Try to be civil and be sure to stay disciplined.

Thank you ,
Your friendly, Republican