Israel is officially an apartheid state

Israel is NOT a democracy

The Jews were expelled from Palestine (Syria Palestina) by the Romans in the second century of the common era. The Muslims, Christians and Druze of Palestine are the indigenous people.

The Jews were expelled from Palestine (Syria Palestina) by the Romans in the second century of the common era. The Muslims, Christians and Druze of Palestine are the indigenous people.

you're just peddling your typical bullshit.

Ignore the time scale if you wish;

The Israelis are the indigenous people here.

No, it's not correct. As usual, you are offering your opinions, and calling them fact. Your opinions are informed by your political prejudices, and not at all informed by history. You are just peddling your typical ipse dixit fallacious bullshit.

You're also peddling a straw man fallacy. I didn't say the Jews are not indigenous. You said that only the Jews are indigenous, and that's bullshit. The ancestors of the Christians, Muslims and Druze who now inhabit Israel were there in Syria Palestina when the Romans expelled the Jews. They are also indigenous to Palestine.

The Israelis are the indigenous people here.

Typical bullshit--the Christians, Muslims and Druze of Palestine are also indigenous.

What you are saying is basically the way I used to think about the whole world; i.e. why can't all national borders be dissolved and everyone's liberty to migrate anywhere respected and honored?

The problem with that is that people don't honor each other's liberty, rights, and otherwise avoid harming and exploiting each other. So it puts those of us who want a world of people to be able to behave themselves well enough to deserve liberty in a precarious position.

So when people are demonstrating their will to violence by sending fire bombs and other attacks, how could you possible trust that granting full citizenship rights won't just move the subversive movement closer to home and make it more difficult to police?

Think of it another way: if the US civil war had resulted in dividing the US into north and south, and people on the losing side were vehemently bitter at their former enemies and seeking to subvert them, would you as a person on the winning side want to extend citizenship to people who might use it to restart the war from within?

Really, I am all for democracy and freedom, but doesn't democracy have to precede freedom; i.e. don't people have to first prove that they can engage in good-faith non-violent civil discourse before you can fully trust and honor their liberty?

It is of course something different when you actively deny people the chance to prove themselves because you ultimately want an excuse to discriminate against them and that's not what I'm talking about.

I'm talking about legitimately seeking to reach peaceful democratic relations so that you can indeed live in a free democratic society where rights and liberty, including that of migration and economic self-determination are universal. In fact, isn't that what zionism is ultimately all about?

The POV expressed in the cartoon is racist and biased.

Religion does not define place of origin. The Jews who originated Zionism were indigenous to Central and Eastern Europe. Genetically, they are mostly Southern European with relatively small percentages of haplogroups exhibited in Middle Eastern populations and heavy homogeneousness. By and large, Jews are descendants of proselytes outside of Palestine.