Progressives (Liberals)

If the president didn't spend most of February downplaying Coronavirus, the US might not be so behind in testing. I am glad he has decided to take it seriously at last.

revelette3 wrote:

If the president didn't spend most of February downplaying Coronavirus, the US might not be so behind in testing. I am glad he has decided to take it seriously at last.

One more time. The presidents early travel ban on China saved our ass. Give credit where it is due. Any downplaying was made worse by people and the media for the purpose of defeating Trump. They do not give a **** about the people, and it shows.

Bingo, CJ:

Quote:

Neither Biden Nor Sanders Would Have Saved American Lives With Travel Bans Like Trump Did

On Jan. 31, 2020, the Trump administration announced that foreign nationals who had traveled to China in the past 14 days would be denied entry into the United States. Since then, most medical experts, as well as ordinary Americans, have viewed Trump's prophylactic travel ban from China as a life-saving decision that slowed the spread of the Wuhan virus in the United States.

But few realize that Trump's call was a tough one that went against the bureaucratic academic models crafted to help inform his decision....Cuccinelli further stressed that "the president was well aware" that the existing models recommended against a China travel ban but that Trump nonetheless instituted the ban.

...Biden offered other similar criticism of the president's handling of the Wuhan virus, saying, "This is no time for Donald Trump's record of hysteria and xenophobia, hysterical xenophobia, to uh, and fearmongering."...Biden's recently unveiled position statement on responding to the Wuhan virus made no mention of a travel ban, indicating that Biden, like his remaining primary opponent, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, opposes temporarily closing U.S. borders to protect Americans. Sanders, explicitly said in an interview with Fox News' Bret Baier that he would not close the borders.

There is no way Biden, Sanders, or any other potential Democratic president would have gone against the academic models' conclusion to leave open travel from China. And there is no way a Democratic commander in chief would unilaterally cut off travel from the EU to put Americans first.

President Trump did. And he saved countless lives in doing so.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/03/19/neither-biden-nor-sanders-would-have-saved-american-lives-with-travel-bans-like-trump-did/

As usual, Oralloy posts egregious bullsh*t.

The Senate voted not to convict on February 5.

You're full of sh*t.

I point out you errors on a regular basis.

You're just incapable of acknowledging your errors.

The lying piece of sh*t remark referred to the fat boy in the White House.

In your case, I consider you to be seriously deluded, yours more of a mental health problem.

Quote:

I’m just asking, where did all this [at the very least] resentment come from? It’s not healthy, it’s not rational either. There’s something there.

Other people's anger can often appear irrational. Or perhaps anger is always at some distance from rationality. But that "it" isn't anti-Semitism at work. Fran Lebowitz, for example, does not like Bernie.

Mr. Trump is going to be reelected regardless of who the Democrats nominate.

I had a whole paragraph (the very first one even) where I explained, clearly that my distaste for WHAT (not “who”) Sanders has done to the country is based on his actions and his words and the many things he’s done while campaigning.