@Olivier5,
Good points. I think the "sin" belongs entirely to Matthews, however, and not to all the "in-crowd journalists" who have had the sense
not to use such inflammatory comparisons.
As far as journalists viewing Sanders in a negative light, well, what if they really don't like him, doubt his effectiveness as a chief executive, and have no interest in "our revolution"? Journalists — unlike reporters — aren't ethically bound to standards of objectivity, only to truth. It's been interesting looking at the opinion columnists on the
NYT, who only last week were preparing us for a Sanders candidacy and skirting around their personal objections as much as possible and who are now free to ask tougher questions and unleash harsher criticism.
And, on a smaller scale, we see the same thing on A2K, and I imagine in the Democratic base as well. If people's misgivings about Sanders as a candidate are beginning to surface now, I don't think their opinion of the man himself will improve as he begins to lash out at Biden, personifying the stereotypical "crotchety old guy" role for which he's so well suited; he looks like somebody sent over by Central Casting.
I guess it boils down to whether Democrats favor democratic socialism and are willing to risk a second Trump administration in its pursuit or prefer a more inclusive and gradualist message. Now that the field has cleared we'll finally get a chance to find out.