hightor
 
  4  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 10:52 am
The Pied Pipers of the Dirtbag Left Want to Lead Everyone to Bernie Sanders

Many listeners would never repeat what these podcast hosts say. So why do they desperately want to hear from them?

Quote:
IOWA CITY — The people in the crowd were angry, and “Chapo Trap House” wanted them to stay that way. The five hosts of the popular socialist podcast wanted everyone to know they had all been lied to. About everything.

The media they consumed was fake news aimed to distract them from the only war worth fighting: the class war. Politesse, civility, even pleasure — those were tools of the neoliberal oppressor. The right answer is rage.

“That joy,” the Chapo co-host Will Menaker said to the crowd gathered in Iowa City on the eve of the Iowa caucus. “That’s good but it’s not as good a motivator when you’re really going to war as spite.”

“Let the hate feed you,” the co-host Amber A’Lee Frost added as the audience roared.

And it does. Especially toward other Democrats.

Supporters of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. are “gelatinous 100 year olds.”

Former Mayor Pete Buttigieg is “a bloodless asexual.”

“The gayest thing about him is he descends from an ethnic group that’s like a little toy dog,” Ms. A’Lee Frost said.

When Senator Elizabeth Warren’s name came up, the crowd made the sound of a snake hissing. She had accused Senator Bernie Sanders of saying that a woman could not win against Donald Trump, and so she is a snake.

“Yes my sssssoldiers,” Mr. Menaker said.

Former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s run appalls them. “Beat him so badly that this midget gremlin won’t even have a shot even with a trillion dollars,” Mr. Menaker said.

“Kill him,” someone shouted from the audience. These were jokes, of course. Everyone was laughing.

As Mr. Sanders rises in the polls and claims strong showings in early states, a new set of media stars is on the rise, too. Leading the pack are the hosts of “Chapo Trap House,” the Pied Pipers of the candidate’s online movement.

In their rowdy, vulgar weekly podcast, they are stoking the fires of a political insurgency led by their 78-year-old idol. The man stands for the movement, the movement is the man.

“Our boy Bernie” they call him.

The fivesome of “Chapo Trap House" are not the only bards of the new American left — there is Red Scare and another whose name cannot be printed — but they have led the way for a movement that together generates millions of dollars a year. They are on their way to becoming the socialist’s answer to right-wing shock jock radio. Their primary targets, in evidence at that show in Iowa, are not the Republican Party or even Mr. Trump but rather centrist liberals, whom they see as the major obstacle to a workers’ revolution.

In blurring occasionally violent humor, jovial community meetups and radical politics, they are the Tea Party reborn for progressives, and for their fans the appeal is in a bawdy offensive balance to cautious mainstream liberal politics.

They are known collectively as the Dirtbag Left, a shorthand they embrace that winkingly dispenses with any notion of liberal purity or inclusion, a defense mechanism that doubles as a nickname.

Most of the podcast fans would never say out loud what they are listening to onstage or through their AirPods on the commute. It’s offensive, even as a joke.

So why do so many progressives want to hear it?

The anti-establishment establishment


“Chapo Trap House,” which started in 2016, typically runs between 60 and 90 minutes. Two episodes are released every week, one for free and one for the nearly 38,000 people who pay $5 a month through the crowdfunding site Patreon. It leads to a financial windfall for the self-professed socialists who are harnessing this rage: $168,800 a month from those subscribers alone.

The main draw of the show is their banter, the hosts distilling the news of the week and checking in on their favorite and least favorite characters. But they have had major guests, including Mr. Sanders himself.

“These people on top are so powerful that the only way we bring them down, the only way we make the kinds of transformation this country absolutely requires is when millions of people are prepared to stand up and fight back,” Mr. Sanders said during his interview.

And the Sanders campaign maintains a close relationship with the podcast. His senior adviser David Sirota and his national press secretary Briahna Joy Gray have also been on the podcast. At the Iowa show, a Sanders volunteer stood at the door with fliers and pins to hand out and an email list to gather names.

Their followers — on the night in Iowa City more than 700 strong — come to hear them rage for three hours against the student debt, the high rent, the dead-end creative class jobs, and the feeling of hopelessness fighting against a liberal political establishment that seems polite when they are angry.

They were promised a better life, a more dignified life, and they are done waiting for it.

And for fans, it brings a sense of strength and community during a political era that has only felt like defeat.

“It’s really easy to feel alone in America. It’s the loneliest place in the loneliest time,” the co-host Felix Biederman said, speaking of the early days of their work. “But eventually people started to gather around all these posts into the void.”

The podcast has also morphed into a touring political rally: In addition to the Iowa show, the Chapo crew went to New Hampshire and Nevada, and they have a handful of dates in California leading up to Super Tuesday, filling large venues.

The topic is inequality, raging against the rich.

Progressives who are more concerned with racial equality or gender parity have had to figure out how to either go against the Dirtbag movement or resign themselves to this singular focus, which occasionally runs roughshod over all the rest.

“I’m a news junkie, and it’s good to supplement that with joking especially in America where everyone has to be so careful about what they say,” said Steven Sutro, a 32-year-old lawyer, who attended a comedy show last summer that featured a popular Dirtbag Left podcast host.

Julius Krein, the conservative founder of the new publication American Affairs, has noticed the new allies.

“There is a lot of interesting convergence on some of the anti-woke thinking and many things that, perhaps surprisingly, we agree on, for different reasons,” he said. One of the Chapo hosts contributed a piece to his magazine.

“It’s fairly easy to have fun, pretty exciting dialogue between right-wing anti-neoliberals and left-wing anti-neoliberals.”

But what some call an exciting dialogue can feel exclusionary to others.

“‘Chapo Trap House,’ the entire Dirtbag Left, have tapped that male privilege of intimidating people into assuming you’re cool,” said Amanda Marcotte, a liberal feminist writer for Salon. “It reminds me of when we pretended that ‘Jackass’ was funny back in the day, just so dudes wouldn’t bully you about not liking it.” (Ms. Marcotte has been vocal in her criticism of “Chapo Trap House” and is the subject of mocking attention from the dirtbag universe.)

As it grows in influence, the Dirtbag Left movement is now running into several challenges.

The movement’s identity is based on being in the wilderness. What happens if its leaders become the establishment? That seems increasingly possible as Mr. Sanders holds on to front-runner status in the 2020 campaign. They want what Mr. Sanders wants: universal health care, canceled student loans, free college, and an overhaul of the tax system. They want to cut the national prison population by half and to install a ban on fracking. And for them anything less than this is nothing at all.

These Sanders supporters eschew the idea of party unity as a scam: “I won’t vote for anyone but Bernie in the general, can’t say what the hundreds of thousands of people who listen to my show will do, but I’m only speaking for myself,” Mr. Menaker wrote on Twitter a day after the Iowa caucuses.

An additional challenge is that as the free-floating anger they stoke finds community, it is escalating and souring into sometimes violent and ugly rhetoric — the kind of rhetoric that other Democratic contenders have fashioned into a major critique of Mr. Sanders.

On Monday, the Sanders campaign fired a campaign organizer, Ben Mora, after his private Twitter feed was revealed to include derogatory comments about 2020 candidates. The Chapo hosts publicly supported Mr. Mora, praising his organizing work and saying, “I hope the campaign doesn’t cave to these whiners and losers.”

For the hosts and their fans, those sort of tweets and the podcast language are all jokes. The audience understands the difference, they argue, and anyway the real problem with the Democrats is that they’re overly sensitive. A bunch of self-serious PMCs (members of the professional-managerial class).

Over the summer, the “Chapo Trap House” message board, which has nearly 153,000 members who chat about the news and memes of the day, was censured by Reddit, which hosts it. The page now has limited reach and is in a sort of digital purgatory, where it remains.

“The reason for the quarantine is that we have observed repeated rule-breaking behavior in your community, especially in the form of encouragement of violence,” Reddit administrators wrote to the group. Comments considered in violation included jokes around historically violent left-wing populist revolutions, like who goes to the guillotine first.

While Hitler jokes are well understood as vile, there is less consensus on what to do when Stalin is the punchline.

“If you want to kick off ironic Nazis, what do you do with the ironic Maoists and ironic Stalinists?” said Andrew Marantz, author of “Antisocial: Online Extremists, Techno-Utopians, and the Hijacking of the American Conversation.”

After receiving their punishment, Chapo moderators wrote to Reddit frustrated: “Are all references to gulags to be considered violent content?”

What Chapo means to the people who listen

The Chapo show in Iowa City was sold out. A few young men wandered down the line asking if anyone had spare tickets.

“We do everything our parents say, and it doesn’t work,” said Brayson Cope, 18, a college student from Altoona and a Sanders volunteer.

His reason for listening to Chapo is simple, he said.

“They’re angry. I like it because they’re angry.”

A man in a Vets for Bernie shirt listed some of the words that he learned from listening to Chapo: Marxist materialist, the superstructure, neoliberal. That last one is the top insult in this group — neoliberal shill, is how it would be phrased. And, according to fans of the podcast and movement, there are a lot of neoliberal shills out there.

For many left-wing groups, the Chapo podcast and its Reddit community are now setting the weekly conversation agenda.

“It’s a touchstone,” said Brendan McGillicuddy, 39, who teaches in the cultural studies department at the University of Minnesota. “At my workplace, everyone listens to it, even if you don’t like it.”

As the show began, the five hosts sat in a half circle, dressed casually.

“I hear you live in your parent’s houses,” Mr. Biederman said.

They dove into a discussion of the caucuses, and polling, and whether the media is fair to Mr. Sanders (they think not).

“Should everything go according to plan on Monday, you will have the opportunity to drive a stake through the heart of every single one of the most insufferable cowards in the world,” Mr. Menaker said.

“I’ve been keeping a list,” Ms. A’Lee Frost said. “Have you been keeping a list?”

There was a case of White Claw, an alcoholic seltzer water, onstage.

When Hillary Clinton’s name came up, the reaction was nearly indistinguishable from a Trump rally.

“Lock her up,” the co-host Matt Christman said to the crowd.

The crowd began to chant: Lock her up. Lock her up.

“She never really cracked the glass ceiling,” Mr. Biederman said. “She more like fell down the glass staircase.”

During the three-hour show, there is little vision laid out for what they want, beyond a Sanders presidency. There is a vision for what they want destroyed and how good it will feel to do that. The idea of actually taking power is terrifying, and they say so.

“What’s scary is the idea that this could end,” Mr. Biederman said. “What’s scary is we’re not just tossing catharsis into the void, that this is something real. We are there.”

The Chapo radicals

When “Chapo Trap House” tried to put on an event in Brooklyn over the summer, the Gowanus Canal, a Superfund site in the middle of a now-trendy neighborhood, flooded and was mixed with a downpour to make a knee-deep, fast-moving, debris-filled river.

Fans held on to one another as they marched through it to get to a live taping. Inside the venue, they sat in folding chairs as water rose at their feet. When the bathrooms began flooding, the manager decided the night was canceled, and fans begrudgingly slushed their way out.

The Chapo co-host Virgil Texas (he lives and works under that pseudonym) went to a nearby bar for a beer.

“It’s a common experience to be someone with a crappy job who does not have an outlet for your set of beliefs and you feel insane because you’re surrounded by liberals or Evangelicals or whatever stultifying milieu,” he said. “And one day you find a piece of media with some folks who are articulating what you always believed: You’re not crazy, you’re right, this is exactly how the world works, and you’re getting screwed.”

He said he knew that the anger the podcast was building could be dangerous, but he said the anger — and the fear of violence it brings — was good.

His girlfriend at the time, who worked in the media, joined at the bar. He ordered popcorn and a coconut cocktail called the painkiller, and sat hunched over, gesticulating rapidly in the tight space between his face and his lap.

“Educating a generation and saddling them with debt and then not giving them jobs where they have the wage that they presume they should receive based on the amount of time they spent on education,” Virgil said. “That’s a pretty good way to turn them into radicals.”

He is a good example of his own target audience: He graduated with $100,000 of debt from Cornell and after college took freelance gigs from Craigslist, hoping to write.

While the Chapo hosts rail against the media establishment, they are also deeply entwined with it and largely beloved by it. (Mr. Menaker, for example, grew up on the Upper West Side, the son of a New York Times editor and a New Yorker editor.)

Their goal is to cut off the right wing of the Democratic Party. The center-left and the center-right are in cahoots, friendly and living near each other in wealthy neighborhoods like the Upper West Side and —

“Westchester,” his girlfriend interjected softly. (She is from there; she wants to stay anonymous; the Chapo fans scare her.)

“No no, I wasn’t going to say Westchester, darling,” he assured her.

He does not want to live in a capitalist society at all.

“I think it’s a moral stain to live in this society,” he said. “And every day I think, God I’d rather just leave.”

But he’s not sure where he would move.

For now, he has decided to go on the road.

Outside the Iowa City show, Adam Angstead, 46, had stepped out of the theater for a cigarette. He works for the Iowa City school district as a substitute teacher five days a week, but he said his employment offers no benefits. On the weekends he works at a diner. Twice a week he sells his blood plasma for extra cash.

It’s still not enough. He was trying to pay down his $40,000 in student loans for a while, but it hardly made a dent, and recently he has gotten a deferment. For him, the primary feels like a life-or-death battle.

“Being in a room with a bunch of people who think the same thing or close made me think we might not all literally die,” he said. “Bernie’s the only one.”

Toward the end of the show, the crowd by then frenzied and a little drunk, periodically broke out in chants of Mr. Sanders’s slogan: Not Me. Us.

And finally, with the Chapo hosts leading, they stood and sang “Solidarity Forever,” the old trade union anthem.

People put their arms around each other and swayed as they screamed.

In our hands is placed a power
Greater than their hoarded gold
We can bring to birth a new world
From the ashes of the old.

nyt/bowles
blatham
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 11:19 am
@hightor,
Rabble roused. These boys don't much different from gamer-gate dudes or the types who latch onto Hitler moustaches and tiki torches.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  4  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 11:21 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
This thread is about progressives. Not sure Biden and Harris qualify as such.


As such things are gauged nowadays, I’m pretty sure they don’t. But, I didn’t know of any thread on which to post a general comment about the democratic campaign strategy moving forward.

Quote:
But that's not my point. My point is that what people talk about on social media tends to stray quite far from reality into the wild hypothetical or even the deranged, and should not amount to 'news'. What's trending on Facebook or Whatsap is irrelevent to the discussions we're having here.


The range of tone and subject matter on “social media” does indeed vary from the sublime to the ridiculous. I trust my own judgement.

Quote:
If you want to talk about what folks on Twitter talk about, go to Twitter... And if you want to say that you would welcome a Biden-Harris ticket, say so.


So, what I get from this... I don’t know what to call it... this ’advice’ from you is that if I had posted “What are your thoughts on the growing buzz about a Biden/Harris ticket?”, you would have found it more acceptable because it makes no reference to other social media sites.

Quote:
No need to refer to what some unknown folks are discussing on some other platform.


I can only hope that you have some small inkling of exactly how ridiculous it is for you to be trying to tell me how to post what I post. At least if you have that semblance of self-awareness, then I’m not totally wasting the effort it takes to answer you on an officious ass with delusions of being some kind of internet gatekeeper or something.

At least then I won’t regret trying to answer you intelligently instead of telling you the location and distance that you could stick your sage advice.

Your opinion about not referring to other social media sites is noted. I don’t want to put you on ignore because you actually say some things that make sense.
Your serve.


snood
 
  4  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 11:25 am
@hightor,
Hey man, I hope you consulted with Olivier5 before you made reference to what people on podcasts are talking about. That **** might not be cool.
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 12:00 pm
@snood,
He-hee....

Well, angry radical dirtbags are a hell of a lot more persuasive than dead, white rich guys...

Quote:
Why vote for Bernie?—featuring JFK, FDR & truth.


Oops! Oh ****...

0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 12:28 pm
We knew Clyburn would come out for Biden, though it is a fool's mission.

Nobody can even approach the enthusiasm that gathers voters to Bernie.

It is stupid to quake with fearfulness about what the GOP will say about Bernie.

We'll win in the general in spite of the cowards fighting us in the primary.

There was a day when someone considered a lefty couldn't win in the general.
There was a day when a black man couldn't win.
There was a day when a woman couldn't win.
That is not today.

In other news, it appears that Bernie will win Warren's state. (What's the argument again about her winning the presidency?)

Stupid Centrists....

0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 12:56 pm
https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/mle200226c20200226021116.jpg
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  6  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 01:00 pm
I have never been a Bernie fan. I’m of the studied opinion that he hasn’t the tools to be an effective POTUS, and that he isn’t the best of the remaining Democrats.

That said, I am consciously trying to live in the real world and make room for the possibility that he may end up being our nominee. I am trying to create in myself the mindset that I will be genuinely motivated to do everything I can in word or deed to help him get into the White House. I’ve made some progress in my attempts to adjust to the possibility because I’ve begun to try to imagine scenarios with Bernie actually trying to see what he could accomplish with a Republican Senate still there. You know, trying to game out in my mind how a Bernie presidency would actually look.

Liz Warren is my candidate. Biden is my second choice. Bernie is my third.

But numbers is numbers. I’m anxious to see what Super Tuesday holds.


0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 01:30 pm
@snood,
I know right? Talk about creating something out of nothing.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 01:36 pm
The largest county in SC closed 52 polling places with no prior notice to the voters registered there.

Gee.

Wonder why?
revelette3
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 01:36 pm
With this coronavirus, who knows how Super Tuesday and the rest of the primary will be affected. I know I sure wouldn't want to go to any large gatherings. Might order some mask by the bulk for me and my family before voting day. I rarely go out, but when I do it is to the store and the doctors one of which is located in a hospital---where sick people are.
revelette3
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 01:37 pm
@Lash,
I don't know, do you have any ideas?
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 01:50 pm
I see Lash is busy with marking me down, well, go with it if it makes you happy.

In any event, If someone knows why they shut down those polling places in SC today (if such is true), can they post it?
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 01:53 pm
Quote:
Voting is underway in South Carolina's pivotal primary, the last primary before Super Tuesday. Former Vice President Joe Biden is hoping for his first 2020 win and Senator Bernie Sanders has momentum from his victories in New Hampshire and Nevada, and his popular vote lead in Iowa.

The state is seen as a bellwether for Democrats, since black voters, considered crucial for the party's victory in November, make up a majority of the Democratic party electorate in the state.

A Monmouth University poll published Thursday showed Biden back with a 20-point lead — 36% to Sanders' 16%, and Tom Steyer at 15%.

This week, Biden won the key endorsement of congressman James Clyburn, the third highest ranking Democrat in the House and one of the most powerful forces in South Carolina politics.

Elizabeth Warren, who has spent 22 days in the state over 15 visits, needs a strong finish. But the latest CBS News Battleground Tracker has her in a distant fourth place behind Steyer, with just 12% of the vote.

Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar are both polling in single digits, a bad sign for campaigns that have struggled with African-American voters.

Mike Bloomberg will not be on the ballot until the Super Tuesday states on March 3.

Polls close at 7 p.m. ET.


South Carolina's open Democratic primary means Republicans can vote, too

When South Carolina voters cast their votes in the state's Democratic primary, registered Republicans will also be able to show up and vote. The state's primaries are open, which means all registered South Carolina voters can participate in either party's primary regardless of political affiliation.

Some South Carolina Republicans and Tea Party activists are encouraging Republican voters to participate in Saturday's contest. Karen Martin, organizer of the Spartanburg Tea Party, is leading Trump 229 (229 for February 29th), an effort that's using social media and word-of-mouth to encourage Republicans to vote for Bernie Sanders on Saturday.

The Republican Party announced in September that it would join a list of other states that would not hold a presidential primary this year. Historically, the South Carolina GOP also didn't hold primaries when Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush were incumbents in 1984 and 2004, respectively.


https://www.cbsnews.com/live-news/2020-02-29-primaries/
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 02:04 pm
Quote:
Some on social media have taken issue with South Carolina’s practice of consolidating or changing precincts. The State talked to Chris Whitmire, the spokesman for the state elections commission, to find out what’s going on.

Yes, some precincts throughout the state have been consolidated, Whitmire said.

Yes, South Carolina has done this before in presidential primaries, Whitmire said.

No, this was not done yesterday. It was done months ago, Whitmire said.

“None of this was done yesterday,” Whitmire said. “I think this was people finding out yesterday.”

Statewide 130 precincts have been moved or closed, according to state data.

For those that are closed or moved, there is a sign out front directing voters to the correct primary, Whitmire said.

Polling places can be moved or consolidated because they are not available.

For example, Lexington County had a precinct move recently because heavy rainfall flooded the voting place, Whitmire said.

“That’s why it’s important for voters to check” online to double-check their precincts, Whitmire said.

However, polling places can also be consolidated to save money.

State law requires elections officials to consolidate precincts during presidential primaries if it can save money. Here is the relevant portion of the law, Section 7-11-20(b)(2):

Read more here: https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article240733756.html#storylink=cpy



Lash
 
  0  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 02:18 pm
Really depends on whose ox is gored, doesn't it. Today, you approve voter suppression because you don't like the candidate who benefits from a large turn-out. Just like Republicans. Bias makes strange bedfellows, eh?

____________________________________

This story was supported by the Pulitzer Center.

CHARLESTON, S.C. — The “First in the South” Democratic primary will not have all of its precinct voting locations open on February 29. Despite the fact that South Carolina has an open primary and any registered voter can participate, the biggest county in the state has closed one-third of its polling locations.

Greenville County closed down 52 precincts; most of those precincts will be consolidated and some will be shifted into temporary locations, but instead of 151 polling locations, Greenville County will have only 118. Across the state, 131 precinct polling places will be relocated.

Consolidating polling stations is a regular occurrence in South Carolina, and Greenville has already planned to do it for the first four elections of this year. “We did that for January 7th, for January 21st, we did it for tomorrow’s election on the 29th and for a sheriff’s election on March 10,” County Executive Conway Belangia told the Prospect. “All of those [elections] being countywide.”

This precinct consolidation for the highest-profile 2020 election in South Carolina has not been publicized, however. Instead, the new voting location for residents is updated on the South Carolina Election Commission website. “They don’t tell people what’s been closed. They’ll tell you where to go,” said Brett Bursey, executive director of the South Carolina Progressive Network. Regular registered voters are unlikely to go online to confirm their polling location before every election.

Belangia told the Prospect that the change was made because the 52 original locations were in schools, and they couldn’t host voters while the school year was in session. (bullshit)

The Greenville County Democratic Party chair told the Progressive Network that the county kept the high number of relocated stations in place for the primary, so they wouldn’t confuse people who adjusted to the changes for the first two elections this year.

Such decisions add to voter confusion in a state that already has many nuanced voter laws. The sudden changes can be undertaken because changes to the election system no longer have to be pre-approved by the U.S. Department of Justice. In the 1965 Voting Rights Act, Section 5 of the legislation prevented states with histories of voter suppression and intimidation from making any logistical changes with elections before DOJ could review them for possible discrimination or unnecessary impediment. (But, revelette doesn't think people really need the 1965 Voting Rights Act anymore. Neither do REPUBLICANS.)

In 2013, the Supreme Court struck down the “pre-clearance” requirement, saying it was no longer necessary, because the discrimination that used to occur in voting laws no longer occurred. Organizers and activists in South Carolina say otherwise. (Well, thankfully, there's no more discrimination in SC voting!!...Lash)

“Voters in South Carolina still, even as of this very moment, are faced with voter suppression and disenfranchisement,” said Dr. Brenda C. Williams, CEO of the non-profit The Family Unit in Sumter, South Carolina. “You might ask how is that in the year 2020? How is that after the Voting Rights Act of 1965? How is that after Shelby County v. Holder’s Supreme Court decision that said that racism is over, voter suppression is over, voter disenfranchisement is over?” Williams mused.

Consolidated polling stations can cause long lines and multiply the effect of any election-related hiccups, such as technology problems or short staffing. Belangia said he hasn’t made any staffing increases at the polls, despite the heightened attention on South Carolina’s primary.

“Our staffing is fine for what we’ve got going on in the locations, provided we don’t have any 50 percent turnout of registered voters we ought to be good,” Belangia said. He added that his county doesn’t expect more than 20 percent of participation from registered voters tomorrow.

The South Carolina Progressive Network will be surveying people outside of consolidated precinct stations on Election Day to gauge how this change affects voters, in addition to rapid response available through the voter hotline and the election monitoring teams from the ACLU and the Legal Defense Fund.

https://prospect.org/politics/south-carolina-closing-poll-stations-without-notice/


Be ashamed!
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 02:31 pm
Quote:
Nobody can even approach the enthusiasm that gathers voters to Bernie.

Trump's voters seem pretty enthusiastic.
Quote:
It is stupid to quake with fearfulness about what the GOP will say about Bernie.

Yes, that would be stupid but I don't know anyone who's "quaking" in fear of what the GOP will say about Sanders. More people are probably afraid of what Sanders will say about Castro. I think a lot of people are genuinely worried that Sanders's message only appeals to a minority of Democrats and that even if the Democratic Party were to somehow unite around the guy, he still wouldn't attract enough independents to overcome the incumbent's advantage. However, we don't know what the situation will be by the time of the convention and certainly not in November.
Quote:
We'll win in the general in spite of the cowards fighting us in the primary.

The way the primary process works, Sanders could win the nomination without achieving a majority — that doesn't equate to winning against Trump. It doesn't do anything to secure majorities in Congress either.
Quote:
There was a day when someone considered a lefty couldn't win in the general.

It hasn't happened yet.
Quote:
There was a day when a woman couldn't win.

Nor has that happened yet. It doesn't look as if a woman will win the nomination this time. Maybe there'll be a surprise.
Quote:
That is not today.

Actually it is.
Quote:
(What's the argument again about her winning the presidency?)

She'd be a formidable opponent to Trump. She has a way of leveling with people that doesn't sound doctrinaire or preachy. She's a good listener.

The only reason Sanders even has a shot is that Trump is such an antagonizing polarizing blowhard. Were Sanders running against a McCain, a Romney, a Jeb!, or a Rubio he wouldn't have a chance.
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 02:36 pm
@revelette3,
Quote:
No, this was not done yesterday. It was done months ago, Whitmire said.

If this is true it's just another example of people neglecting to familiarize themselves with the rules.
Quote:
“That’s why it’s important for voters to check” online to double-check their precincts, Whitmire said.

You'd think the campaigns would have made this widely known.
georgeob1
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 04:26 pm
Very interesting times ahead in the Democrat Primary contest. We'll soon know how well Biden fared in the South Carolina Primary. The result may well keep Biden's candidacy alive for a few weeks, but given his recent issues it's hard to see him still ahead of the pack after Super Tuesday.
That said it remains to be seen if Bloomberg can resuscitate his campaign - it's certainly a possibility, but the side effects of his efforts so far to buy the process appear to be rather negative for him.
Meanwhile Sanders is still running hot and, despite a likely setback in South Carolina, has more momentum going for him than any other candidate as they all approach the cluster of State primaries ahead.

Meanwhile the DNC and the Democrat Congressional leadership are contemplating the possible "down ballot" consequences of a Sanders candidacy and considering just what they might do to prevent losses in their positions in the Congress. The DNC still has considerable authority to influence the primary through the Convention process and associated voting rules, and some new developments might arise there.
I suspect that, just as they did earlier with the Mueller Investigation and later the recent Impeachment, the Democrats will be tempted to pin their hopes on direct attacks on Trump, perhaps this time using the Coronavirus crisis as a tool. These efforts have so far been counterproductive for them, and it will be interesting to see whether thoughtfulness and strategy can in, their minds, overcome desperation and hatred.

Complex situation and a hard one to forecast..
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Feb, 2020 04:38 pm
@hightor,
You’d think the polling stations would make it widely known. They owe it to the people who vote there to inform the people who vote there.

Disgusting anti-Democratic opinion.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 11:52:27