Progressives (Liberals)

How about if they just said nonsense or called it a lie, and not say why, would that be better?

Yeah, it’s been shared here, too, but you obviously don’t want to know because you keep forgetting it. Like everything else Bernie has said.

You establishment types are so afraid of nicknames. You must’ve cowered in the loser corner of the kindergarten playground, sniveling all during recess.

We’re not afraid of anything Donald Trump can say.

Those trump voters will be told relentlessly about the cuts trump is making on social security, farmers will be told how trump’s failure to address climate change is killing their livelihoods. Our campaign has real answers for real people. Trump says he wants to run against Bernie—but we know the opposite is true. Unlike you idiots who only rely on name calling and personal attacks on their hero, we are looking at their lives and how a Sanders presidency can have meaningful sustainable positive change for their day to day existence.

Also, thanks to the idiocy of the constant 24/7 attacks on trump, his voters are furious and highly motivated to get out the vote.

Establishment democrats are a liability in this fight.

Yup. Anyone can see it, if they take off their ideological spectacles:

source

This is the USA folks. The majority of voters aren't going to choose economic upheaval. The majority of voters will vote against uncertainty. The majority of voters will stick with an incumbent buffoon presiding over a Potemkin economy rather than take a chance with someone who threatens the status quo. The majority of voters will support the barely acceptable huckster they know over the alien rabble rouser they'll be led to fear. I really don't see some deep well of common sense and social conscience that is there for the near-octogenarian to tap into.




It's one thing to win crowded primaries where votes are split, emerge on top, and declare victory. It's another thing to cobble together enough votes to overcome the solid support which the MAGAsaurus commands. He's already got a lock on 45% of the electorate and only has to fool 6% of independents and disaffected Dems to win. Loyal Sanders voters comprise, at this point, about a third of the Democrats. The math doesn't look good.

Last 24 hours...

1) @PeteButtigieg camp caught illegally coordinating w/ Super PAC
2) @JoeBiden caught lying about being arrested in South Africa b4 meeting Mandela
3) @mikebloomberg camp caught buying social media support
4) @ewarren flip flops on Super PACS

But Russia.......

Bloomberg, Sanders, Biden . . . it's like a "pick your geezer at death's door" contest. Lash supports Sanders because she knows Plump would mop the floor with him.

I know. It's pathetic.

There is a very young, invigorated massive movement who has catapulted him to the top and who are training and qualifying to lead this movement forward. Bernie was the only one we trusted to get us in the WH. We have the people to take it from there.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/nv/nevada_democratic_presidential_caucus-6866.html

Bernie's 19% up. Let's see how Pete edges him out in delegates and how that oddly-timed Russia 'leak' plays into the rationale...

Okay. I like the DeLeonist model of socialist revolution at the ballot box, followed by wholesale amendments to the Constitution to legitimize the revolution. And Sanders is a remarkably consistent and sincere public servant. I recognize the movement's passion — I question its breadth and depth. I think it's more frightening to the very people it seeks to help than it is to the owner class. I like seeing those seas of red hats at Trump's rallies, but they all say "MAGA"; there's not a hammer and sickle to be found. I think we'd need another ten years of education, development, and struggle; I think winning the nomination is a short-cut to nowheresville.

Politico

I presume taxpayers are who are left funding all of this scummy dipshit's nuisance suits.

Vichy America is nowheresville. #TheTimeIsNow

This is what buying an election looks like--and it's just like David Brock / Hillary Clinton's Correct the Record paid shills. I wish Twitter had done something about them, but at least they've slowed Bloomberg's roll. (Really surprised he didn't just pay them off.

He DID pay off Zuckerberg.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-bloomberg-twitter/twitter-suspends-group-of-pro-bloomberg-accounts-over-platform-manipulation-idUSKCN20G054

(Reuters) - Twitter Inc on Friday said it had started suspending and restricting dozens of accounts posting content promoting U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg.

“We took enforcement action on about 70 accounts, which includes a combination of permanent suspensions and account challenges to verify ownership,” a Twitter spokeswoman said in a statement to Reuters.

The action was first reported by the Los Angeles Times.

The Bloomberg campaign did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

Twitter said the accounts violated its platform manipulation and spam policy, which prohibits coordination among accounts to amplify or disrupt conversation by using multiple accounts.

This can refer to creating several accounts to post duplicative content but also includes “coordinating with or compensating others to engage in artificial engagement or amplification, even if the people involved use only one account.”

The billionaire candidate’s campaign, which has been pouring unparalleled amounts of money into an online advertising campaign, is also hiring hundreds of digital organizers to support the candidate, including by pushing content to their own social media channels.

The Wall Street Journal reported that these organizers in California receive $2,500 a month to promote Bloomberg’s candidacy through actions such as posting on social media to their own networks.

This month, a paid partnership between the former New York mayor’s campaign and popular Instagram meme accounts pushed Facebook Inc to announce it was allowing U.S.-based political candidates to run branded or sponsored content on its social networking platforms.

Reporting by Elizabeth Culliford. Editing by Gerry Doyle



https://twitter.com/GrandmaNixon/status/1231218771903123458?s=20

For the life of me, I can't imagine how anyone might see this as Stalinist. Stalin admired and supported those who disagreed with and criticized him.

Apparently it's time for the 2 Minute Hate programming to kick in again

Sanders is a carpetbagger who only became a Democrat because he wanted to be President so badly he could taste it. Appealing to young voters may sound all progressive and idealistic, but young people don't vote. Plump appeals to the middle-aged and elderly demographic who do vote. In Bernie's Plump watch thread, Lash said that the Republicans were her party and Plump was her president. First she admitted it, and then she defied me to prove it. She kind of got that backwards. I don't need to indulge petty, vicious personal attacks and name-calling to point this out. Lash is, and always has been deceitful about her support for Sanders, who ought to have "Loser" tato0ed on his forehead.

You can’t deny it, so you distract from it.
Hillary Clinton and David Brock created the SAME TYPE of pay for political supportive statements EXACTLY LIKE BLOOMBERG.

Deny it.

In Bernie's Plump watch thread, Lash said that the Republicans were her party and Plump was her president.

This is a lie. He knows it.

The coward can’t answer about policy, so he uses his favorite page out of his hero trump’s playbook—distract, divide, lie. Setanta is working himself into a sweat, supporting Trump.

Distract, divide, lie.

Jesus. That you imagine yourself an effective propagandist/troll is a head-shaker. No one here (other than one person? maybe) trusts or admires you. We would all prefer it if you weren't dishonest and if you weren't stupid but you're both those things.

Good interview of Harry Reid in the New Yorker Here's one quick bit...