@McGentrix,
Quote:Without quoting somebody else, what is it exactly do you think happened around the sentencing of Roger Stone?
Sure. Let's look at the timeline:
1) the prosecutors made a sentencing recommendation based on the nature of the crimes and based on relevant federal sentencing guidelines.
2) Trump sent out his angry tweet
3) within some hours, Barr announced a review of the recommendations
4) Trump sent out another tweet suggesting a thank you to Barr for backing him up
5) Barr made a public announcement saying he wouldn't be bullied and Trump's tweets weren't helping him
Given Barr's prior dishonesty (his withholding of and false/distorted summation of the Meuller findings) consistent support of Trump and given his long-held ideas on how presidential powers should have few
if any constraints from Congress or prior norms or even settled law (he does not believe in co-equal powers) there is little reason to imagine that his acts constitute anything but blanket support for Trump regardless of anything else. But, for a set of reasons which are partially transparent and obvious, he must forward the pretense that his Justice Department remains dedicated to consistent judicial practices and that it is not determined by partisan/ideological goals. We would be correct if we were to presume he would NOT have been operating in this manner if the president was Obama.
Quote:Former Justice Dept. Lawyers Press for Barr to Step Down
More than 1,100 former prosecutors and officials who served in Republican and Democratic administrations signed an open letter condemning the president and the attorney general over the Stone case.
NYT