We repeatedly provide it.
You repeatedly ignire ut
and just like rruno double down on the bullshit.
oralloy wrote:You have failed to provide even one example of me saying something that is untrue.
You have failed to provide even one example of me providing a cite that isn't reputable.
Nice try. Better luck next time.
That statement is itself untrue.
Hes made the same exactly precisely the same claims over and over and over again for years.
Theyre disproved again and again
Thats trolling abd its indefensible. So stfu.
At least I have enough brain cells to post a coherent comment, Length of membership here is meaningless.
What a hero you are taking on someone you utterly disdain!
I agree; it is boring. As are his pat responses on nearly every thread where he posts.
As I mentioned the other day, many of his comments, ones which earn him his enviable record of thumbdowns, are just conjecture or opinion and can't really be disproven.
He interprets this as a sign of his infallibility.
Hightor is precisely right. Conjecture masquerading as fact.
We"re perfectly willing gexally to sdmit its conjectureI or opinion when it is.. Oralloy is not.
I do, quite often, I'm sure. But I don't use the inability of others to counter my opinion with facts as a mark of my own infallibility.
yesterday, China released a video showing troop carriers moving to the Hong Kong border.
things you lied that I said.
rather confusing to claim never being wrong and follow up with how he admits when he is wrong.
You do however claim everything you post is true and factual and has not been shown to be wrong
Simply because you refuse to admit it does not make the refutations wrong.