Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jun, 2019 03:45 am
Finally, someone speaks the truth to Israel about what they have become.
———————
https://mondoweiss.net/2019/06/sanders-occupation-palestinians/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=sanders-occupation-palestinians

Bernie Sanders links Hitler’s murder of his family to his fight against occupation of Palestinians
News Philip Weiss on June 5, 2019 2 Comments

Bernie Sanders in his message to the American Jewish Committee. Screenshot. June 4, 2019.
     
We’ve closely followed the statements of Democratic presidential hopefuls to the American Jewish Committee. Almost every candidate so far has been careful to skirt the Israel question, hinting at some mild criticism of Israel but not actually voicing it. Joe Biden went after the Palestinians. Kamala Harris embraced Israel. No one has mentioned the occupation or Palestinian human rights with any specificity.

Till now, that is. Bernie Sanders weighed in yesterday with a forceful message that connects the murder of his own family by the Nazis to his fight against the crushing, humiliating military occupation by Israel of Palestine.

Sanders said that Gaza is also occupied, that Netanyahu is a reactionary who is planning to annex the West Bank, and that a two-state solution must produce a viable Palestinian state based on the ’67 lines, with Jerusalem as a capital. Just what Netanyahu rejected and shoved in Barack Obama’s face eight years ago in the White House, without any consequences.

Sanders began by saying that anti-Semitism is not an abstract idea to him. “I am Jewish and very proud of my heritage.” His father emigrated from Poland at the age of 17 to escape discrimination.

“Those in his family who remained in Poland after Hitler came to power were murdered by the Nazis. Antisemitism is not some abstract idea to me. It is very personal. It destroyed a good part of my family.”

He said that Jews therefore have a special role to play. “Jews who have been victims of discrimination for centuries must help lead the effort in fighting back against hatred and racism wherever and whenever we see it.”

And that includes Israel. Sanders calls himself “someone who believes absolutely and unequivocally in Israel’s right to exist in peace and security, who as a young man lived in Israel for several months.” But:

We must say loudly and clearly that to oppose the reactionary policies of Netanyahu doesn’t make anyone anti-Israel. Let me say it again, I am vigorously opposed to the reactionary, racist and authoritarian policies of Donald Trump. That does not make me anti-American. I am not anti-Israel because I oppose Netanyahu’s policies.

Yes, Sanders itemized Trump’s racism more than Netanyahu’s. But Sanders becomes specific about those policies. Saying that the United States should lead the world with a foreign policy that focuses “on democracy and human rights rather than on a foreign policy that emphasizes the continued use of military force,” he moves to Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.

I see Israel making enormous technological advances with the capacity to serve as an engine of innovation and prosperity for the entire region, yet unable to achieve this goal because of its unresolved conflict with the Palestinians. I see a Palestinian people crushed under a military occupation now over a half century old, creating a daily reality of pain, humiliation and resentment. Let me be clear, I do not know how peace can be achieved in that region when in the Gaza Strip poverty is rampant, 53 percent of the the people are unemployed, the number of unemployed is even higher for young people. And 99 percent of the residents cannot leave that area. That is not a sustainable situation. Ending that occupation and enabling the Palestinians to have independence and self-determination in a sovereign, independent, economically viable state of their own is in the best interest of the United States, Israel, the Palestinians and the entire region. It is a necessary step in insuring that Israel is accepted and integrated into a region it has so much to offer.

There is enough blame to go around on all sides, he says. The peace process will be very difficult, but agreements are possible if there is a serious willingness to sit down and talk and compromise. Sanders seems to channel his Brooklyn homey Norman Finkelstein:

The truth is that the parameters of a solution are well-known. They are based in international law, they are based in multiple UN Security Council resolutions, and they are supported by an overwhelmingly international consensus. Two states based on the 1967 lines with Jerusalem as the capital of both states.

Then back at Netanyahu:

Unfortunately Prime Minister Netanyahu and his allies seem to be preparing for a future in which Israel controls the entire territory between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River in perpetuity and the Palestinians receive limited autonomy within a disconnected series of communities. That is not an acceptable outcome for anyone who supports the security, freedom and self-determination of both peoples, as I strongly do.

Sanders links Netanyahu to rightwing “demagogues” around the world. “We are seeing the rise of authoritarian intolerant political leaders who are attacking the foundations of democratic societies.” They are fanning hatreds. Instead of using their leadership positions to bring people together around their common humanity, “these demagogues try to divide us up by our religion, by the color of our skin, by the country we came from by our gender, or our sexual orientation.”

He closes by explaining that Jewish history gives Jews a special role to play in fighting intolerance and injustice.

As history reminds us time and time again, the antidote to hatred, division and resentment is to bring people together around a shared vision of equality and prosperity, of creating societies that work for all and not just a few. I am absolutely convinced that the future will belong not to those who practice bigotry and hatred but to those of us who believe in peace and justice and are willing to fight for those values.

Based on our history, no one should be more active in that struggle than the Jewish people.

These strike me as the most explicit references Sanders has made to his Jewishness, to Jewish exceptionalism, to the price his family paid to anti-Semitism, and how that history informs the struggle against the persecution of the Palestinians by Israel and against Netanyahu.

Remember that in 2016, Sanders shocked the Democratic establishment by daring to say Netanyahu is not always right, debating Hillary Clinton before the New York primary (yes, weak beer, but…). Once again, Sanders is leading the discussion inside the Democratic mainstream/progressive world. Yes, the grassroots are giving him the freedom to make these daring statements. But he is leading the way in mainstream forums.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jun, 2019 05:10 am
@Lash,
Excellent!
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jun, 2019 05:25 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
I think she’s got a lot to offer.

So did Willie Brown.


They dated. What’s your big scary point?
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jun, 2019 05:27 am
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

Tell us all about her, then. She's got a visibility deficit.


You don’t need me to tell you about her; you just haven’t been interested in her to begin with. Google is your friend.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jun, 2019 05:41 am
@snood,
Indeed, since I don't vote in American elections, I don't need to know anything about Harris, and therefore you don't need to tell me anything about her, nor about any other candidate for that matter... :-)

Still, I like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders quite a lot. They are the kind of candidates that help me not to give up on the American people entirely. Living proofs that the US is still kicking.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jun, 2019 05:51 am
@snood,
snood wrote:


They dated. What’s your big scary point?

Sort of like Trump dated. You definitely lose the ‘personal morality’ righteousness if you back Harris.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/2695143002
Excerpts numbered by me.

1. Brown was married at the time he and Harris dated, but – because he had been "estranged from his wife" Blanche Brown since 1981, according to People magazine –the relationship was not kept secret. A Sacramento Bee reporter told People that Brown "had a succession of girlfriends" and would "go to a party with his wife on one arm and his girlfriend on the other.”

2. A 1994 Los Angeles Times report about then-California Assembly Speaker Brown's "rush to hand out patronage jobs" described Harris as Brown's "frequent companion" and said several people referred to her as Brown's girlfriend. That report also cited a column from the Chronicle's Herb Caen that called Harris "the Speaker's new steady." When they met, she was 29 and Brown was 60.

3. Among the issues that followed Harris from her time with Brown was the allegation of cronyism in his appointment of her to two well-paying posts.

"Yes, I may have influenced her career by appointing her to two state commissions when I was Assembly speaker," Brown wrote Saturday. Brown was the speaker from 1980 to 1995, prior to his stint as San Francisco mayor.

Brown appointed Harris to the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and then to the Medical Assistance Commission – positions that paid her more than $400,000 over five years, according to SF Weekly. Brown also gave Harris a BMW.

"And I certainly helped with her first race for district attorney in San Francisco," he said in his Chronicle letter Saturday..

———————
Harris’ rise on her back is the kind of cronyism progressives (and other people who hate corruption) won’t vote for.
Olivier5
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 6 Jun, 2019 06:00 am
@Lash,
So she's got a vagina and hasn't kept it untouched. So fuckin' what?
Lash
 
  2  
Reply Thu 6 Jun, 2019 01:26 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

So she's got a vagina and hasn't kept it untouched. So fuckin' what?

That’s hilarious. I dgaf who she screwed; I do care if that screwing earned her high-paying jobs that someone else actually earned with qualifications and on the job experience. To turn that into *just sex* is blatantly disingenuous.

You don’t like it when Trump gives jobs to family or fuckmates. Same thing.
livinglava
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jun, 2019 03:13 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

Olivier5 wrote:

So she's got a vagina and hasn't kept it untouched. So fuckin' what?

That’s hilarious. I dgaf who she screwed; I do care if that screwing earned her high-paying jobs that someone else actually earned with qualifications and on the job experience. To turn that into *just sex* is blatantly disingenuous.

You don’t like it when Trump gives jobs to family or fuckmates. Same thing.

I thought you had to give them a job or they would turn you in for cheating or sexual harassment or #metoo or something, not to imply that everyone who reports sexual abuse is doing so because their blackmail demands haven't been met.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jun, 2019 12:40 am
@Lash,
That's making quite a few assumptions, like that she wasn't qualified for these jobs.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Reply Fri 7 Jun, 2019 04:26 am
Elizabeth Warren Rises in 2020 Race as Policy Focus Catches Fire
By Sahil Kapur
June 6, 2019, 10:00 AM GMT+2
Quote:
“She’s not the shiny thing but she’s the smart thing.”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-06/warren-has-a-plan-to-rise-in-2020-pack-as-she-closes-on-sanders
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Fri 7 Jun, 2019 12:55 pm
@Olivier5,
Only white u s presidents are allowed to touch vaginas.
Lash
 
  0  
Reply Fri 7 Jun, 2019 01:08 pm
@RABEL222,
Clinton and Kennedy definitely made their arguments on that stupid claim.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Reply Fri 7 Jun, 2019 01:09 pm
@Olivier5,
Warren is BernieLight and unreliable.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Reply Fri 7 Jun, 2019 03:28 pm
@Lash,
Bernie is a communist allied with Putin. See its easy to post opinion as facts. You, Ollie and JC do so all the time which is why the only people who pay any attention to you are the newbies.
0 Replies
 
neptuneblue
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jun, 2019 08:19 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:
Warren is BernieLight


What does that actually mean?
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Jun, 2019 02:11 am
@Lash,
That's not what Bernie himslef is saying. He's got only nice words for her.
Lash
 
  2  
Reply Sat 8 Jun, 2019 04:23 am
@Olivier5,
That’s ok with me.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Jun, 2019 08:43 am
@neptuneblue,
‘Socialism’ has been the boogeyman in this country since McCarthyism—even though the US has several popular, helpful policies taken from the socialist ethos. FDR saved millions of people in our country by adopting pronounced ‘socialist’ policies.

Perpetuating this fallacious fear is expected of well-meaning (however ignorant) people who have been groomed by establishment political parties to really believe socialist policies will murder America (ironic, because capitalism IS LITERALLY KILLING AMERICANS), but intelligent people in politics, who front that bogus **** are using antiquated propaganda for their own nefarious self-interests.

I consider Warren to be intelligent. And she is guilty.
neptuneblue
 
  2  
Reply Sat 8 Jun, 2019 08:52 am
@Lash,
Oh.

"BernieLight"

So it's a made up word that only you know its meaning.

Ok.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 02:18:24