Why Won’t the Media Cover Progressives Radicalizing Their Own?
Quote:
And there is the problem. The media has gone beyond bias to willful, malicious partisanship. The very groups and voices that have radicalized multiple would be mass murderers on the left are those that get prime time slots on television and in newspapers to attack the right. For the media to cover this would require self-reflection and a level of recognition of the media’s own partisanship.
Feminism is the extremism. It sees compassion in an act of violence. It sees strength when someone succumbs to despair.
Feminism is immoral, whether you are religious or not, it is against human decency.
Why do feminists think that women aren't responsible enough to abstain from risky sexual behavior if they don't want to risk pregnancy? Seems pretty sexist to suggest that women aren't adults capable of acting responsible on their own...
How about more women act like responsible adults and keep their legs closed, since all the anti-male/pro-feminist laws in this country make them the gatekeepers of consensual sex.
Why Won’t the Media Cover Progressives Radicalizing Their Own?
The idea might be for them to practice on themselves and then try to radicalize intelligent people. Learn to walk and then learn how to run and all that...
0 Replies
Lash
1
Reply
Thu 30 May, 2019 06:41 pm
Biden is going down over his racist statements about Clinton’s crime bill.
0 Replies
neptuneblue
2
Reply
Thu 30 May, 2019 09:32 pm
Poll: Harris, Warren climb as Biden maintains lead
BY JONATHAN EASLEY - 05/23/19 12:00 PM EDT 214
Former Vice President Joe Biden maintained a healthy lead over the Democratic primary field, though Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) posted big gains in the latest Monmouth University poll.
The survey finds Biden at 33 percent support, up from 27 percent lasts month. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has been on a steady decline, falling from 25 percent in March to 20 percent in April and 15 percent in the latest survey.
Harris has moved into third place with 11 percent support, up from 8 percent in April, while Warren is close behind at 10 percent, up from 6 percent last month.
South Bend, Ind. Mayor Pete Buttigieg has fallen by 2 points, to 6 percent support. But another female candidate, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), has tripled her support, rising from 1 percent last month to 3 percent in May.
About half of the Democrats surveyed in the Monmouth poll come from states that will vote by Super Tuesday on March 3, 2020, and the women in the race fare even better among these early-voting states.
When the poll is narrowed to potential early voters, Biden’s support falls to 26 percent, followed by Sanders and Harris at 14 percent each. Rounding out the field are Warren at 9 percent, Buttigieg at 6 percent and Klobuchar at 5 percent.
All told, the six women running for president combine for 27 support, up from 16 percent in the prior survey.
“Women are commanding a larger slice of Democratic support than they were a few weeks ago and we are seeing bumps in their individual voter ratings,” said Monmouth University pollster Patrick Murray. “We can’t parse out the exact reasons from this one poll, but recent efforts by certain states to restrict access to abortion services may be playing a role in the closer look these candidates are getting right now.”
Biden still has the best favorability in the field, but the women in the race have become more popular in the past month.
Warren is known by 88 percent of Democratic voters, with 60 percent having a favorable view of her against only 14 percent who view her unfavorably. That’s up from a 51-19 split in the prior survey.
Harris is known by 82 percent of Democratic voters, with 58 percent holding a favorable view and 9 percent viewing her unfavorably. In the prior survey, Harris’s favorability rating was 50 percent positive and 10 percent negative.
The Monmouth University survey of 334 registered Democrats was conducted between May 15 and May 20 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 5.4 percentage points.
0 Replies
FreedomEyeLove
-4
Reply
Thu 30 May, 2019 10:53 pm
@FreedomEyeLove,
This is cold blooded murder.
Today I listened to calls recorded in an abortion clinic. The abortionist was advising multiple women who were 27 weeks pregnant!
When a woman has a baby murdered by having an abortion, what happens is that the abortionist pushes a long spear through the baby's head into it's skull and brain to kill it. The baby is conscious during this and feels all the pain!
The abortionist in these calls then advised these vile women what to do with the still birth after the murder. She tells these women that while they're sitting on a toilet giving birth to their dead babies, that if it bothers these women to look at what's happening and to see the result of their vile actions, that these women can "Put a towel over it", and that they don't have to look at it.
This is the result of feminism and female solipsism.
Women so selfish, that they want to pretend that what they're doing isn't even happening. These women convince themselves this!
And if the baby can't be removed through a still birth, the abortionist takes long metal tongs and rips the baby apart limb by limb to remove it from the mother!
Decent human beings recognize that compelling a woman to bare a baby she does not wish to have, let alone raise, is truly a malign act. It disrespects the sovereignty of a conscious decision-making adult and imposes a narrow and specious "religious" argument based on sentiment rather than ethics. The graphic depictions of the procedure which are meant to evoke emotional horror hardly amount to a fraction of the suffering and misery experienced by unwanted and emotionally abandoned children and mothers who are unwilling or unable to raise them properly.
Decent human beings recognize that compelling a woman to bare a baby she does not wish to have, let alone raise, is truly a malign act. It disrespects the sovereignty of a conscious decision-making adult and imposes a narrow and specious "religious" argument based on sentiment rather than ethics. The graphic depictions of the procedure which are meant to evoke emotional horror hardly amount to a fraction of the suffering and misery experienced by unwanted and emotionally abandoned children and mothers who are unwilling or unable to raise them properly.
The greater question is whether such negative images of abortion are strongly compelling enough to overpower the strongly compelling eroticism that stimulates media-consumers to desire sex more than they desire avoiding pregnancy.
If men were really against compelling women to bear unwanted babies, they would only have sex with women who are interested in getting pregnant.