@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:
Oh please. For a fresher on Kamala Harris on her questioning of Barr which made him stumble and offer inanities.
In an obvious attempt to simply score a point during her interrogation, Harris asked Barr if he had reviewed all the evidence in the Mueller report before approving it, stating it was "his duty as a prosecutor to review all the evidence before proceeding". I suspect Barr was dumbfounded by the inanity of the question, and simply said (truthfully) "no".
The obvious fact here is that Barr was not the prosecutor at all : Mueller was the appointed Prosecutor, and he had spent more than two years collecting and reviewing the evidence and producing a detailed report establishing his findings. Barr's job as Attorney General was to review the report for consistency and conformity with law and approve it if it was OK.
It appears Harris was suggesting that Barr spend another year or so redoing Mueller's work.
Harris' question & response merely an empty stunt designed to exploit her position on the Senate committee to a witness who could not, in that setting, respond to her in kind.
Meanwhile Barr is back at work overseeing an investigation into the origins of this fraud which is likely creating a lot of real fear among the senior Obama era FBI and intelligence community officials involves. Some are already starting to squeal.