@blatham,
blatham wrote:
Quote:promises of a detailed replacement
Paul Ryan (now a bigwig at Murdoch's operation, what a surprise) and the rest of the Republicans have been promising this since the ACA came into being. It ain't going to happen. They are just flat out lying about it. Even though the ACA was built on a Heritage designed plan, and even though it had been put into place in by a Republican governor in Mass, the GOP tried to portray it as a "socialist" plan that, axiomatically, could not work. The ACA struck at the heart of modern conservative ideology and its desire to reduce citizen government to the size where they could drown it in the bathtub. That is what's going on.
There's no working with these people. They have to be crushed electorally.
Edit: Another factor in Trump's latest push is electoral. He wants to be able to say he kept his campaign promises. Would he actually kill healthcare for millions of Americans for no other reason than campaign speeches? Just ask yourself, what would a sociopath do?
You continue to bend the facts and infer motivations that you can't possibly verify to serve your prejudgments in this unending stream of propaganda.
Obamacare included a "Tax" that was in fact a penalty for not signing up, and thereby involved a very real constitutional issue. The USSC evaded that matter in the initial review, and will now have to face and decide on the issue specifically. That's how our government was designed to work.
In addition the ACA (and its "brilliant" designers, Professors Jonathan Gruber and Ezekiel Emanuel) so larded up the requirements for coverage that the premiums became excessive, adding to the reluctance of the young and healthy to sign up. Apparently they recognized this to some degree and built in some as, yet unauthorized, provisions for massive Federal subsidies to insurers - which were not included in the cost accounting attendant to the passage of this ill-conceived legislation. The fact is ACA is collapsing as a result of its own internal contradictions.
Progressives wish to be judged based only on their supposed good intentions, and not on the actual content of the ill-conceived "solutions" they produce. This is a curious form of derangement, perhaps most vividly illustrated by the new radicals in the Democrat Party and their "Green New Deal"
There are better possibilities for expanded access to health care, involving increased interstate competition among both providers and insurers and less mindless bureaucratic control of the process. I believe Trump will seek to advance them, notwithstanding your unfounded assertions that he and Republicans are lying about it. Oddly you appear to accept Trump's commitment to keep his electoral promise with respect to ending ACA, but reject it completely with respect to replacing it. Just how do you claim to know that apparent contradiction is true?