@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:Quote:the USS Liberty incident
So, what's your interpretation of this "incident"? I have been on message boards where the issue was hotly debated. I know next to nothing on modern warfare from a technical standpoint (boats, planes, radio protocols, etc...) so I couldn't make a clear call for or against the arguments presented. You know this area inside out. What do you say?
Liberty was a large Navy communications intercept ship. It was operating off the Sinai peninsula, monitoring the communications of Israelis and Egyptians in the then rapidly unfolding 1967 campaign there. I suspect the Israelis did not want us to learn about their plans to invade Egypt proper in this campaign. A squadron of Israeli Mirages was launched from the Hatzur base in Israel and attacked and repeatedly strafed the unarmed ship (painted in Navy colors and flying the American flag). During the attacks the ship repeatedly broadcast its location and identity on numerous frequencies monitored by the Israelis. About an hour later a second wave of Israeli aircraft resumed the attack. The ship was badly damaged and about 40 of the crew were killed. The incident was played down by our political leadership, but the folks in the Sixth Fleet (Mediterranean) and the Navy as a whole understood the event very well, and knew it was a deliberate attack carried out by the Israelis to mask their intentions in the 1967 War, which they initiated.
The event left a lasting impression in Navy circles, and, despite our government's formal support for Israel, the Navy remained decidedly cool (almost hostile) towards Israel for a long time afterward.
The port visit to Haifa I described was unusual in several respects and directed from the Pentagon in Washington. It was clearly a political move, initiated by the Israelis to heal some old wounds (hence the senior delegation and extended hospitality).