@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
Of course they do. If they choose to do these things for money, or hope of money, he is violating no one's civil rights, is he?
And I did not use the word "attack", consensual crotch grabbing is not an attack.
coldjoint wrote:
The only word that matters. The women are entitled to nothing.
So your argument is that Donald Trump should get a free pass for grabbing women's crotches , because obviously these women hope to get money out of it? Nicely put, because even if they don't get a penny and nothing was said about any money whatsoever, it's still impossible to prove they didn't hope to get money out of it eh?
So what can I conclude from that line of deduction? As long as you are rich, and can therefore claim that people would allow whatever you wish to do to them because they hope to get paid for it, you should get a free pass? So what else would be allowed?
Take rape, for instance. By your logic, rape would be permanently off the table when you are rich. After all, rape by nature implies a non-consensual act, and you just went ahead and claimed that can't be the case, since the persons being 'raped' were obviously hoping to get money out of it. What a lovely sentiment.
