3
   

Should we show respect for other people's "beliefs?"

 
 
Twincams
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 09:14 am
Hi people, as you can tell by my post count, i'm new on here.

I've been reading through the pile of flapdoodle on this respecting the beliefs of heretic dittle-dottle and am at a loss to understand what it means.
The only post I read which made any sense was by Spendius. Leaving aside his/her satire in the first paragraph (which was quite funny in view of what had gone before) The question that was being asked there was-do you Yanks respect the beliefs of your parent's generation regarding the aboriginals, who you rifled the rich and bountiful land off and which any broken down, slack-arsed diddico could have made a fortune out of. Either you do or you don't? Please tell us.

Twincams.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 09:42 am
Twincams wrote:
Hi people, as you can tell by my post count, i'm new on here.


Yep...almost all of us realize that "1 post" means "new."

But thanks for mentioning it.

Ya never know!!! :wink:

Welcome aboard.

Quote:
I've been reading through the pile of flapdoodle on this respecting the beliefs of heretic dittle-dottle and am at a loss to understand what it means.



Really!

After reading that sentence over a few times, I think I can understand why.


Quote:
The only post I read which made any sense was by Spendius.


Yep...I'm pretty sure I understand why.



Quote:
Leaving aside his/her satire in the first paragraph (which was quite funny in view of what had gone before) The question that was being asked there was-do you Yanks respect the beliefs of your parent's generation regarding the aboriginals, who you rifled the rich and bountiful land off and which any broken down, slack-arsed diddico could have made a fortune out of. Either you do or you don't? Please tell us.
Twincams.


Just what we needed!

Another Spendius.

Oh well!

In any case...yes, we did learn how to conduct ourselves among aboriginals. You Brits taught us that lesson very well...and oh, so often.

Wasn't that the lesson of the Brits

Move into an area...and kick the **** out of anyone who happened to live on what you then considered your land...and set up those silly little tents and break out table clothes and tea service...and then talk about Queen and country as though you would remain at the top of the hill...rather then end up at the bottom looking up at some third world countries?

Yeah...you taught us to perfection....and we were a bunch of savages.




Ummmm...why did you ask, Twincams?

Did you have a point you were going to make?

I am very interested in what you have to pontficate.
0 Replies
 
Twincams
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 10:32 am
Frank Apisa wrote:

Yep...almost all of us realize that "1 post" means "new." But thanks for mentioning it.
Ya never know!!! :wink:


Excellent, an attempt at sarcasm, what a nice start to the day :wink:

Quote:
in any case...yes, we did learn how to conduct ourselves among aboriginals. You Brits taught us that lesson very well...and oh, so often.
Wasn't that the lesson of the Brits Move into an area...and kick the **** out of anyone who happened to live on what you then considered your land...and set up those silly little tents and break out table clothes and tea service...and then talk about Queen and country as though you would remain at the top of the hill...rather then end up at the bottom looking up at some third world countries?
Yeah...you taught us to perfection....and we were a bunch of savages.


Sorry to throw a spanner in the works m8, but i'm 100% Irish and proud of the fact that WE never invaded any country and masacred it's inhabitants.

Quote:
Ummmm...why did you ask, Twincams?

Did you have a point you were going to make?

I am very interested in what you have to pontficate.


I recently decided to take a look at the American history (what little it has) and up until recently, native american indians were viewed as cannon fodder Surprised
We no longer see films depicting indians as savage killers who must be exterminated at all costs, nor films where every american household has a black slave.
Slavery in america was abolished in 1865, and up until that point (and beyond) most americans believed that slavery was acceptable Mad

So I suppose my point is... do the americans still respect their ancestors beliefs??
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 10:51 am
Twincams wrote:
Excellent, an attempt at sarcasm, what a nice start to the day :wink:


I always do my best to make newcomers feel like they've been here for ages.


Quote:
Sorry to throw a spanner in the works m8, but i'm 100% Irish and proud of the fact that WE never invaded any country and masacred it's inhabitants.


Ahhh...Irish...British...six of one, half dozen of another! Twisted Evil

Quote:
I recently decided to take a look at the American history (what little it has) and up until recently, native american indians were viewed as cannon fodder Surprised


Yep...as I said, we learned that from the British.


Quote:
We no longer see films depicting indians as savage killers who must be exterminated at all costs...


Nope...they aren't made any longer. Not politically correct....and all that rot.


Quote:
...nor films where every american household has a black slave.


Well..there never were any of those.


Quote:
Slavery in america was abolished in 1865, and up until that point (and beyond) most americans believed that slavery was acceptable Mad


No...I don't think so. But if you had said a significant segment of Americans (we like to capitalize that word just as you like to capitalize Irish!)..."believed" that slavery was acceptable...I would agree.

Many of them, by the way, depended upon wording from the King James Bible to buttress their arguments that it was acceptable. Hell...if it was acceptable to King James' GOD...what could be wrong with it?


Quote:
So I suppose my point is... do the americans still respect their ancestors beliefs??


Tsk, tsk...sloppy capitalization on that word "Americans" again. I often do that with the word "god." I have a reason. Do you have a reason for not capitalizing "America?" One that you would like to share?

But...back to your question.

I cannot speak for the others...but I certainly do not respect the "beliefs" of any Americans of yesteryear who thought it appropriate to consider native Americans to be savages and to indiscriminately slaughter them. I certainly do not respect the "beliefs" of King James or the Americans who thought it appropriate or moral to keep other human beings as slaves.


Hope that has been of help, Twincams.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 11:00 am
Welcome, Twincams. Fresh points of view are always a good addition to the mix.
0 Replies
 
Taliesin181
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 11:14 am
Nice to have you aboard, Twincams. If I may, I'd like to offer a rebuttal to some of the points you've made.

Twincams said:
Quote:
do you Yanks respect the beliefs of your parent's generation regarding the aboriginals, who you rifled the rich and bountiful land off and which any broken down, slack-arsed diddico could have made a fortune out of. Either you do or you don't? Please tell us.


No, I do not. The view many people on this thread are offering, I think, is that there is a line at which point you're no longer obligated to respect others' values, and this line is usually drawn when the other person's views are either a) damaging to you, i.e. Hitler/Osama, or b) An attempt to subvert your own values, which is a subset of a).

The point of forums like this is to debate out a topic until we find either a answer that everyone can agree with (which almost never happens, but I still love it! :wink: ) or all possibilities have been exhausted (which happens quite a lot!) The line I draw is based on a mix of intent and outcome (like all lines, I suppose.) If someone's expression of their views is meant simply as that, an expression, then I see no real harm in it, even though I might not agree. If the expression is meant to "convert" me, or is followed up with a harmful act - that I have a problem with.

Hope I answered your questions, and welcome again to A2K.
0 Replies
 
Twincams
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 11:32 am
Frank Apisa wrote:
I always do my best to make newcomers feel like they've been here for ages.


Thank you for the warm welcome, appreciated.

Quote:
Ahhh...Irish...British...six of one, half dozen of another! Twisted Evil


Hardly.

Quote:
Yep...as I said, we learned that from the British.


Yep... as I said, i'm Irish.

TWINCAMS wrote:
...nor films where every american household has a black slave.
Quote:
Well..there never were any of those.


"ROOTS" springs to mind.

TWINCAMS wrote:
Slavery in america was abolished in 1865, and up until that point (and beyond) most americans believed that slavery was acceptable Mad
Quote:
No...I don't think so. But if you had said a significant segment of Americans (we like to capitalize that word just as you like to capitalize Irish!)..."believed" that slavery was acceptable...I would agree.


Agreed, I do tend to exaggerate a little when i'm trying to stress a point.

TWINCAMS wrote:
So I suppose my point is... do the americans still respect their ancestors beliefs??
Quote:
Tsk, tsk...sloppy capitalization on that word "Americans" again. I often do that with the word "god." I have a reason. Do you have a reason for not capitalizing "America?" One that you would like to share?


I presume it's for the same reason you don't capitaliSe God, to capitaliSe shows a degree of respect.

Quote:
But...back to your question.

I cannot speak for the others...but I certainly do not respect the "beliefs" of any Americans of yesteryear who thought it appropriate to consider native Americans to be savages and to indiscriminately slaughter them. I certainly do not respect the "beliefs" of King James or the Americans who thought it appropriate or moral to keep other human beings as slaves.


Hope that has been of help, Twincams.


My sentiments exactly! Belief is one thing, knowledge is another. We both know that past american "beliefs" were wrong, will future generations of americans, view america's foreign policies in the same light?? Food for thought!
0 Replies
 
Taliesin181
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 11:40 am
Twincams: In no way do we "americans" have a monopoly on bad decisions...and I freely admit that the administration has made quite a few. However, If we're arguing over slavery, weren't the British (and a few Irish, I'm sure) responsible for the slave trade? Americans of the past might have consumed, but the British(and I use that term to encompass both Isles) produced.

To clear up any misunderstanding - I assume due to your avatar that you're Northern Irish, and therefore part of Great Britain, willingly or not. Is that the case? Thanks.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 12:01 pm
Twincams wrote:

TWINCAMS wrote:
...nor films where every american household has a black slave.
Quote:
Well..there never were any of those.


"ROOTS" springs to mind.


"...where every American household..."

Even in ROOTS...every American household did not have slaves.


Quote:
TWINCAMS wrote:
Slavery in america was abolished in 1865, and up until that point (and beyond) most americans believed that slavery was acceptable Mad
Quote:
No...I don't think so. But if you had said a significant segment of Americans (we like to capitalize that word just as you like to capitalize Irish!)..."believed" that slavery was acceptable...I would agree.


Agreed, I do tend to exaggerate a little when i'm trying to stress a point.


Yes...apparently you do. I'll take that into consideration.


Quote:
TWINCAMS wrote:
So I suppose my point is... do the americans still respect their ancestors beliefs??
Quote:
Tsk, tsk...sloppy capitalization on that word "Americans" again. I often do that with the word "god." I have a reason. Do you have a reason for not capitalizing "America?" One that you would like to share?


I presume it's for the same reason you don't capitaliSe God, to capitaliSe shows a degree of respect.


Were you trying to make a point about the differences in spelling???

You really should learn to be more subtle, Twin.

Sorry you have no respect for America.

There are many of us Americans who have a huge problem with the thugs who have taken over our government. We still respect our country...and are efforting to get it back on some sort of reasonable course.

It is not going to be an easy job...but we are not going to give up.



Quote:
Quote:
But...back to your question.

I cannot speak for the others...but I certainly do not respect the "beliefs" of any Americans of yesteryear who thought it appropriate to consider native Americans to be savages and to indiscriminately slaughter them. I certainly do not respect the "beliefs" of King James or the Americans who thought it appropriate or moral to keep other human beings as slaves.


Hope that has been of help, Twincams.


My sentiments exactly! Belief is one thing, knowledge is another. We both know that past american "beliefs" were wrong, will future generations of americans, view america's foreign policies in the same light?? Food for thought!


As I mentioned...many of this generation already view our path as wrong. If some of you people finding fault with us would get up the spine to insist that your countries stand up to us with a bit more force....perhaps we can get past this unfortunate turn of events.

You might want to consider that!
0 Replies
 
Twincams
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 01:31 pm
Firstly, a huge THANK YOU to all who have welcomed me so warmly.

Taliesin181 wrote:
To clear up any misunderstanding - I assume due to your avatar that you're Northern Irish, and therefore part of Great Britain, willingly or not. Is that the case? Thanks.


Most definitely not! I'm Irish, not british. (satirical avatar)

Taliesin181 wrote:
If we're arguing over slavery, weren't the British (and a few Irish, I'm sure) responsible for the slave trade?


British...Yes, Irish... not that i'm aware of, although i'm open to proof to the contrary

Frank Apisa wrote:
There are many of us Americans who have a huge problem with the thugs who have taken over our government. We still respect our country...and are efforting to get it back on some sort of reasonable course.

It is not going to be an easy job...but we are not going to give up.

As I mentioned...many of this generation already view our path as wrong. If some of you people finding fault with us would get up the spine to insist that your countries stand up to us with a bit more force....perhaps we can get past this unfortunate turn of events.

You might want to consider that!


Seems that although we don't agree on spelling Very Happy we do agree on other points.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 02:30 pm
Twincams wrote:
Seems that although we don't agree on spelling Very Happy we do agree on other points.



:wink: :wink: Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
Taliesin181
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 04:02 pm
Twincams wrote:
Quote:
Taliesin181 wrote:
To clear up any misunderstanding - I assume due to your avatar that you're Northern Irish, and therefore part of Great Britain, willingly or not. Is that the case? Thanks.


Most definitely not! I'm Irish, not british. (satirical avatar)


Ah, sorry for the misunderstanding.

Now that we've put that behind us, where do you stand on the issue of respect of beliefs? So far(and this is not meant to be as defensive as it will come out), all I've heard is America-bashing. What about you, individually?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 04:24 pm
You will have to specify what beliefs.
I believe we should respect a persons religious beliefs with the proviso's that they not try to impose then on others through legislation and they respect the beliefs of others.
Do unto others as they would do unto you.
0 Replies
 
Twincams
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 04:38 pm
Taliesin181 wrote:

Now that we've put that behind us, where do you stand on the issue of respect of beliefs? So far(and this is not meant to be as defensive as it will come out), all I've heard is America-bashing. What about you, individually?


I believe that anyone who's country/habitat/livelyhood is invaded/threatened by another, has every right to defend it by whatever means possible... I have heard stories from my grandfather, and I believe; that my ancestors were 'within their rights' to defend themselves against foreign oppressors. I wouldn't fight for anyone's beliefs, I honestly only have one belief, and that is... we're here until we die, why spend time on religion etc, it's a waste of 'bandwidth'.
So, back to the question at hand... beliefs... I have strong beliefs on certain subjects, they aren't the beliefs of friends/peers/ancestors, they are the result of rational thinking. Any rational thinking human will hold the same beliefs I do... simple as that.

Ok, a swift overview of my beliefs... The 'world' has the power to stop all wars and feed the population of it's planet..... why doesen't it???

There's enough for every person's need, but not enough for everyone's greed.

Appologies for the diversity, but i'm down to the bottom of the second bottle of wine... I know you'll understand.. cheers
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 05:12 pm
Never mind that bullshit...share the wine.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 05:13 pm
oooops...need a Twisted Evil so that everyone realizes I was kidding.
0 Replies
 
clavdivs
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 05:28 pm
Hi All

just bin readin with inerest

@twincams
your from the south my friend? the free state? loverly Very Happy
I see in comments some misconseption perhaps, from others.
Slavery was not the property of the british, nor was the ancestry of the americas solely for one indiginious populous. Many faulted at this hurdle, it was as hives give honey. Greed is the only motive of the king of the food chain.
It fuels wars, and prevents invention.
Clavdivs
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 05:49 pm
Twincams wrote:
[There's enough for every person's need, but not enough for everyone's greed.


Ahhhh...another thing on which we can agree...and agree quite strongly, I suspect.

I've written dozens of op-ed pieces over the years on this very subject.

I usually put the line you offered in the form of a question:

What do we not have enough of?

Do we not have enough food??....clothing???...shelter?


Stick around A2K, Twin.

We'll talk about this in other threads.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2005 08:22 pm
val wrote:
Lola

When you talk about murders, dictators, terrorists you talk about actions, not believes.
So, what is the criteria?
Was Washington a terrorist in the eyes of british soldiers? Hiroxima was an act of terrorism in the eyes of japanese? Was Lincoln a dictator in the eyes of the southern slavers?

Stalin was an atheist. Bin Laden is a theist. Mother Teresa was a theist. Sartre was an atheist. When did their believes about religion drawn the line? When they become "reprehensible"? Reprehensible by whom? Is Bin Laden reprehensible to fundamentalist muslems? Is Bush reprehensible to Republican voters?


Val,

Reprehensible to me.......who else? It certainly wouldn't be when they were reprehensible to Osama or GW for that matter. The subject is should I show respect for other's beliefs. I draw the line when the beliefs are reprehensible to me. I hope this clears things up.
0 Replies
 
binnyboy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 03:31 am
need is greed. there is no need.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 04:06:23