Heeven wrote:I can show respect that a person "has" beliefs.
I don't care whether I agree with those beliefs or not. It is important to that person and I respect that. Still doesn't mean I can't disagree or question them and it should be acceptable to that person that I have the right to do so. Of course we all know that we all think WE are right and so it gets heated. Ah well. It wouldn't be interesting otherwise. We would have no wars without heated differences. And without wars we would have no military or thought of building war machines. And without war machines there would be no thought of what damage and destruction we could do to each other. And without this thought we would never come up with amazing ideas and products that could be used to expand and enhance our lives and communities (as well as the inherrent damage also).
I truly understand where you are coming from on this, Heeven...just as I truly understand where MA is coming from on it...
...but there is an inherent illogical element of the notion to "respect" the "beliefs" of others.
EASIEST EXAMPLE I CAN THINK OF: Suppose someone has a "belief system" that includes the notion that the "beliefs" of anyone else who happens to have conflicting "beliefs"...should be scorned and ridiculed at every opportunity and with as much gusto as possible.
How on earth could you suggest...
Quote: Still doesn't mean I can't disagree or question them and it should be acceptable to that person that I have the right to do so.
...?
It cannot happen.
The notion that we should respect other's beliefs is inherently flawed.