blatham wrote:Quote:Who says her fears are founded on rumor? Has she stated that? I certainly didn't use that word.
How is it that you so willingly discount any and all anecdotal evidence in the other thread, yet bring your own to this thread and offer it as proof that she will most likely encounter no liberal bias on any college campus because you didn't?
Neither I nor anyone else (so far heard from) in this rather large community of users who have been to university. How odd that should be the case.
So your anecdotal evidence trumps that of Leo's daughter's experience, or the Kuwaiti student's experience, or any number of others' experiences shown on the other thread? Rather large community of users? The site may say there are 30,000 registered members, but does that necessarily mean they are "users"? Considering there's absolutely no way to voluntarily "opt out" of membership on A2K, I'd submit neither you nor I have any way of knowing that.
blatham wrote:But you miss the point. You suggest her initial question is 'telling'. Is it? What does it 'tell'? Your obvious suggestion is that there must be, or is likely to be, or may be, something real reflected in the simple fact she asks it.
I think it's you that's missed the point here. She obviously has a "concern" about the subject and asked a question regarding it, ostensibly without knowing about the "other" thread. That's the observation I was making and I think a valid one.
blatham wrote:But of course, on such an evidentiary basis, we can make only the mildest of those assertions ('may be') with any credibility. And we can make that 'maybe' assertion about Mossad involvement in 9-11 too. As stupid as it would be.
You can make that "maybe" assertion about lots of things, but it doesn't make her concern or her question any less valid. We don't know what lead her to ask the question, but you can hypothesize all you want.