14
   

Me Too

 
 
maxdancona
 
  -2  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 07:54 am
@Olivier5,
I understand, and I agree.

But the question is whether women want this change. The discussion is being driven by a political minority that probably doesn't represent what women want in their personal lives in general.

No one wants rape, and no-one want the abuse of power. You will get no argument on that, and I think this will change due to the MeToo thing. That is a good thing.

But the cultural change that it is being discussed goes much further than that; not only to sexual behavior and sexual attitudes... but also to music and movies and popular culture.
Olivier5
 
  2  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 08:35 am
@maxdancona,
Quote:
the question is whether women want this change.

They are not obliged to go down any road, they can chose. As explained in the Deneuve and co. paper, many women can and will, as conscious subjects, opt to be the sexual object of some man and derive pleasure from it. More pleasure than they would derive from being totally "in control".

Many women have rape fantasies. It doesn't mean they want to be raped for real. It means they love it when their man, whom they've chosen / approve of, pretends to be raping them.

Same happens to men, mind you: losing control is a great road to pleasure, as long as you chose to lose control, and with whom you do so.

Similarly, Hitchcock said that people love to be afraid when they feel secure. Horror movie fans would hate to meet a real living dead in real life, but they love to see them in movies.

So... just because more women will become sexually assertive after Me Too doesn't mean all of them will, and doesn't necessarily mean they will use their assertiveness to control men in bed. Many of them will instead assert things like: "take me, use me, do with me as you please, that's what I like". And that's fine with me.
maxdancona
 
  -2  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 10:13 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
So... just because more women will become sexually assertive after Me Too doesn't mean all of them will


I am skeptical that more women will become sexually assertive after Me Too. It seems to me that the movement might have the opposite effect... women in normal interactions may become more withdrawn and suspicious. MeToo, as a movement, is not presenting a very positive message about sexuality in general. In reality, most likely the movement won't have very much effect for most normal people.

I may be pleasantly surprised.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 10:40 am
@maxdancona,
I don't have prescience... It is indeed possible that Me Too leads to just less sex among men and women, on average, and more use of porn instead. In fact such a trend towards less sex and more porn was already noticeable among young people before Me Too, which could well amplify it (see links below). I hope such an effect would be temporary, but it may last.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/02/08/why-young-americans-having-less-sex-216953

http://www.businessinsider.com/herbivore-men-in-japan-are-not-having-sex-8-15

0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 10:50 am
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/02/rob-porters-history-of-domestic-abuse-wasnt-a-secret.html?wpsrc=sh_all_dt_tw_ru

Quote:

Please stop asking why women don’t come forward. These women did. They believed that once the police, the FBI, the White House, and John Kelly knew what they knew, Porter would stop ascending in their ranks. They were wrong.

Rob Porter’s father wrote eloquently about the presidency and “a tone from the top.” The tone from the top of the Trump administration has unerringly been that women are to be cherished and protected right up until the moment they stop being docile and decorative, and then they are to be dismissed and humiliated. Rob Porter’s defenders knew everything they needed to know. They did nothing because he was visible to them and his accusers were nothing. But the tone comes from the top, and nobody should be even a bit surprised.



Quote:
And then, as their mutual ex-husband was being cleared for his job in the White House last spring, both women told the FBI. They actually thought, at that point, somebody might care.


Please stop saying that women don’t tell. These women told. They told the stories of likely the most intimate and traumatic moments of their lives to family and church elders and friends and counselors and FBI officers, and they saw the following happen: Porter was not given full clearance. He was, however, given an interim security clearance. Senior staff in the White House knew why his clearance was snagged by the fall. According to Politico, John Kelly, Donald Trump’s chief of staff and Porter’s boss, also knew of the 2010 protective order against Porter. Don McGahn, the White House counsel, also knew, according to Politico, because in recent weeks a third woman, an ex-girlfriend of Porter’s who also works in the Trump administration, told him that Porter had abused her and his two ex-wives.

But right up until 9:31 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday night, John Kelly was standing by Rob Porter. Even when others had distanced themselves, John Kelly reiterated his opinion that Porter had true integrity and honor.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R–Utah), for whom Porter had previously served as chief of staff, initially told the Daily Mail the allegations against Porter came from lying “character assassins.” His full comment:

It’s incredibly discouraging to see such a vile attack on such a decent man. Shame on any publication that would print this—and shame on the politically motivated, morally bankrupt character assassins that would attempt to sully a man’s good name.

Hatch changed his statement on Wednesday, after learning the actual details leveled by the actual victims. His new statement read:

I am heartbroken by today’s allegations. In every interaction I’ve had with Rob, he has been courteous, professional, and respectful. My staff loved him and he was a trusted advisor. I do not know the details of Rob’s personal life. Domestic violence in any form is abhorrent. I am praying for Rob and those involved.


Apparently “I didn’t see it with my own eyes in the workplace,” is the new “thoughts and prayers.” Note that the central moral issue was no longer the scurrilous women who must have lied to a slanderous press, but Hatch’s own heartbreak. He didn’t apologize to the women he had maligned hours earlier, and it’s not entirely clear if they are part of the group of people for whom Hatch is praying.

John Kelly again evinced no concern for or even interest in these women in his statement Wednesday night:

I was shocked by the new allegations released today against Rob Porter. There is no place for domestic violence in our society. I stand by my previous comments of the Rob Porter that I have come to know since becoming Chief of Staff, and believe every individual deserves the right to defend their reputation. I accepted his resignation earlier today, and will ensure a swift and orderly transition.

It is not clear what the “new allegations” were, since there was nothing he knew at 9:31 p.m. Wednesday he hadn’t known earlier that day, save, perhaps, for the fact that there was a photo. The man we’ve all been feting as the “adult in the room” turns out to be just as adept at disappearing victims of domestic abuse as all the other adults, namely those in the FBI and the Mormon church, who had also known of the allegations against Porter and done nothing.

Today, in response to a question about whether he believes the women claiming Porter abused them, Sen. Hatch said, “I don’t believe them all but I think there’s enough there that you have to take it very seriously.”

Please stop asking why women don’t come forward. These women did.
This questions of “enough” was coincidentally also the subject of a powerful piece from Catharine MacKinnon in the New York Times last Sunday, about why the #MeToo movement is accomplishing what decades of formal legal reforms could not achieve. MacKinnon wrote that “it typically took three to four women testifying that they had been violated by the same man in the same way to even begin to make a dent in his denial. That made a woman, for credibility purposes, one-fourth of a person.” To Republican leadership, Colbie Holderness and Jennifer Willoughby and the third, as-yet-unnamed victim of Rob Porter still seem to amount to maybe 75 percent of a person. Maybe the photo of the actual black eye is the other 25 percent.
maxdancona
 
  -2  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 11:01 am
@ehBeth,
For the record, this is the part of MeToo with which I agree.

Clearly there have been abuses of power by people to gain sexual favors. We all agree that this is unacceptable and that there should be easy ways to report these abuses. No one here is defending Rob Porter, John Kelley or Orrin Hatch. I don't think the claim that this is an unacceptable abuse of power is very controversial.

We can all agree on specific policy proposals that will address institutional problems in the workplace or government. If you are saying that there must be fair ways for victims to report abuses and have them taken seriously you have my complete support. And I agree that we have some changes to make to that end. If you are saying that women must be believed simply because they are women, you lose me.

The problem is the rest of the political narrative that is suggesting that men are abusive in general and attacking social norms with no clear policy to provide a way forward.

MeToo is more than a call for changes to institutions, it is a broad ideological narrative. Key phrases are "toxic masculinity", "rape culture" and "believe women". This is not a way to a constructive conversation.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 11:25 am
@maxdancona,
You keep having this conversation about there being no room for conversation... ain't that a bit odd?

I agree that it currently looks more like a big brouhaha or shouting match than a calm, fructful exchange. But when has the internet ever been civilised, respectfull and constructive? It's a mess, and always has been.
ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 11:40 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
The stories underscore how “sexual harassment is not OK, period — regardless of whether it’s by a man, or a woman. And frankly, this threatens to set the movement back — because when you have one of the faces of this movement facing these allegations, that’s a real problem.” [...]


I agree with the first sentence, not the second.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 11:49 am
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

Quote:
Feminists represent a minority of women. It is not reasonable for them to dictate the way that all men and women will act.


Max should try practicing what he preaches. The fact that he speaks for a very tiny minority of men doesn't stop him trying to speak for all of us.

He doesn't speak for me, or anyone I know. He keeps saying he loves irony, but he doesn't know the first thing about it.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 11:59 am
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:
Sharing the responsibility of sexual initiation with women is in men's best interest, because it will force women to realize how hard it is to propose or ask for sexual intimacy without offending anyone and making any faux pas ever... Trying to court us will hopefully teach women a degree of humility and forgiveness for our own weaknesses in courtship.


your own , and Centrox's, evidence suggests it's already been going on for some time

Olivier5 wrote:

I have a similar experience to yours. I'm shy and have only very rarely proposed to the women i was attracted to. But thankfully, some women let me know that they were attracted by me.


I think it's better for everybody, male and female, if they take responsibility for their own sexual desires and interests.

__


but ... #metoo is at base about power not sexuality

there has been/likely always will be some overlap/relationship between the two but it's nice to imagine that the balance will move further away from power influencing sexual decisions
ehBeth
 
  2  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 12:00 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:
I agree that it currently looks more like a big brouhaha or shouting match


really? I'm not getting the shouting match vibe from you , Centrox, izzy, engineer
maxdancona
 
  -1  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 12:09 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
really? I'm not getting the shouting match vibe from you , Centrox, izzy, engineer


Really, EhBeth puts Centrox and Izzy on this list? Izzy is as abusive as anyone. The majority of his posts are personal attacks. I agree about Engineer and Olivier, both of whom have been pretty respectful even with people with whom they disagree.

That is what group think does for you. If you have the correct opinion, your behavior can't be wrong.


maxdancona
 
  0  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 12:25 pm
There is an interesting discussion here about how the dating and sex is done between singles. Somehow this has gotten tangled up in gender politics. In the real world, gender politics has nothing to do with how personal relationships work. And, that is the problem.

I am not claiming to speak for all men. If there are men who can have women jumping into bed with them, more power to them. I have nothing against men who aren't assertive.

In my experience, women have given me strong clues that they wanted to have sex. Not too long a go a woman put her hand on my thigh on a second date. I took that as an invitation that I should initiate, and I did, and things were great. But, in my experience women still expect me, as a man, to take initiative. This is just what every single in my cohort understands and how it works. I have talked to women about this, is this what they say want... a man to take the initiative.

My point is not that all men or women are the same. Quite the contrary. Although there is a set of social norms that seem to be understood an accepted by most of the people I date. No one makes the norms, they just work because most people just accept them.

My point is that for a political ideology to try to regulate sexual behavior is foolish. In reality, each person man or women is going to do what works for them. And as a broad dating pool, we have a set of rituals that everyone kind of understands. It isn't regulated, it is just how things work out in a social sense.

This is the reality of dating, at least where I am. We all do what works for us. Some of the rituals are kind of funny... we joke about how the woman always reaches for her pocketbook and the man always tells her sincerely that he wants to pay for her meal. This is just something that we do.

Is anyone able to have a reasonable discussion without the politics of this?
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 12:35 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

really? I'm not getting the shouting match vibe from you , Centrox, izzy, engineer

I was talking more generally, on twitter etc. This a2k thread is a bit of an exception, although it's also quite sluggish as compared to the broader social media discussion. A2K appears unfuzzed, or perhaps uneased by a topic that is currently trending elsewhere. I don't know why. Maybe it's a question of demographics.
ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 12:37 pm
@Olivier5,
Still no shouting match vibe for me. I'm pretty connected to this in real life and social media platforms. I'm seeing / hearing a lot of discussion and a fair bit of sadness.
Olivier5
 
  2  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 12:40 pm
@maxdancona,
Centrox is A-okay in my book.
Olivier5
 
  2  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 12:49 pm
@maxdancona,
Quote:
Not too long a go a woman put her hand on my thigh on a second date. I took that as an invitation that I should initiate, and I did, and things were great. 

That's really an interesting way to put it... Let me put it another way:

She initiated by putting her hand on your thigh. You responded positively to her advances, and things were great.
maxdancona
 
  0  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 12:49 pm
@Olivier5,
I believe that you are living in France (correct me if I am wrong). I wonder how much cultural difference there is between the movement here, and attitudes in France. In the US there is theme of "toxic masculinity"; the idea that the way that men were brought up made them bad, or damaged or whatever.

I am wondering if this idea translates to French culture.


maxdancona
 
  -1  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 12:52 pm
@Olivier5,
Quote:
She initiated by put her hand on your thigh. You responded positively to her advances, and things were great.


Ok... it still feels like I took the lead the rest of the way. There are different social expectations based on gender, my point is that they are widely understood, and they have a social function.
engineer
 
  2  
Fri 9 Feb, 2018 02:26 pm
@maxdancona,
And you think that some group of people would have a problem with that story or that Me Too suggests you did something wrong?
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Me Too
  3. » Page 33
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 11/27/2024 at 07:49:28