@maxdancona,
Quote:Feminists represent a minority of women. It is not reasonable for them to dictate the way that all men and women will act.
That's not the point Emmanuelle is making. She's just pointing at the logic of the current movement. If women don't want to be (only) sexual objects, then it logically follows that they need to become sexual subjects. If they want sex, there's no other alternative. You can either be passive or active in your sex life, or a bit of both, but you can't be
neither active
nor passive, neither an object nor a subject. That'd be illogical, hence impossible.
If I say "a door is either open or closed", I'm not imposing my will on doors, I'm just stating a logical proposition. Dito with Emmanuelle's point re. sexual object vs. sexual subject.
You see, it's far easier to criticize someone else's actions than it is to act appropriately. Critique is easy but art is difficult, as we say in French. So far, women had it comparatively easy in that they did not have to approach us men. The only difficulty was to get rid of us when they didn't want us. But after Me Too, I'd bet that men will retreat from the courtship battleground, somewhat, and women will be bound to step in and take responsibility for their own desires -- or they will not have sex.
It's not gona happen to all of us at the same time, but a statistically significant change is bound to happen in gender roles re. sex. Western women have already become more assertive in my lifetime, and this evolution will now accelerate. At east that's my reading.
Sharing the responsibility of sexual initiation with women is in men's best interest, because it will force women to realize how hard it is to propose or ask for sexual intimacy without offending anyone and making any faux pas ever... Trying to court us will hopefully teach women a degree of humility and forgiveness for our own weaknesses in courtship.