@edgarblythe,
So, one every 11 - 12 days or so.
Does anyone at all think that's some magical, wonderful number we should be granting everyone the perfect rights to, as was blessed by the Founding Fathers and is necessary for, oh, I dunno what?
I can't buy Sudafed that fast, ferchrissakes.
I await the Second Amendment arguments. Well, sorry, folks, but the Second Amendment reads as follows, in its entirety:
the Constitution wrote:A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
See:
https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/United_States_of_America_1992
It's about the right to have a militia. And even if you want to toss out the militia part, why oh why is it impossible to have restrictions on the Second Amendment when we have them on the First?
The First Amendment reads, in its entirety:
the Constitution wrote:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Yet we still have slander and libel laws. We still don't allow an incitement to riot, or rioting itself.
How come the Second Amendment has no restrictions, whereas the First has several?
I'm not talking about anyone not being allowed to have guns. Want to hunt? Awesome. Want to target shoot? Have a great time. Want to defend your family? I'm not averse to that, either.
But when you have more than 15 times as many guns as you have hands - and we are only talking about what Paddock purchased in 2017, isn't that a little (yes, the pun is intended) overkill?