1
   

911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB OUR NATION IS IN PERIL

 
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 09:21 am
Then I suppose the gubmit's really got them alien critters stashed away out there at Area 51 an' it was Grant that killed Custer..
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 09:27 am
That's why we have time cops... :wink:
0 Replies
 
ForeverYoung
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 09:28 am
timberlandko wrote:
Then I suppose the gubmit's really got them alien critters stashed away out there at Area 51 an' it was Grant that killed Custer..


Well, that's just silly.

Everybody knows that 9/11 was planned by the gubmit at Area 51 an' it was Grant that killed Lincoln.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 09:43 am
I think we all know who's really responsible for the murders on 9-11. If we stop imagining all these fantastic theories and just think for a secondÂ… the answer becomes pretty obviousÂ…




















http://www.scotland-calling.com/touring/great-glen/ness7.jpg
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 09:50 am
The sound of so many whistling in the dark.... on either side of an issue.... certainly is efficient at polarizing people so much that the real truth about anything is safe from discovery.....
0 Replies
 
ForeverYoung
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 09:55 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
The sound of so many whistling in the dark.... on either side of an issue.... certainly is efficient at polarizing people so much that the real truth about anything is safe from discovery.....


What is "the real truth" according to you?
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 10:19 am
ForeverYoung wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
The sound of so many whistling in the dark.... on either side of an issue.... certainly is efficient at polarizing people so much that the real truth about anything is safe from discovery.....


What is "the real truth" according to you?


I don't know...that's why I consider more than what is delivered to me by right OR left wing hysterics...and I certainly don't take what comes out of the White House at face value.....
0 Replies
 
ForeverYoung
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 10:22 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
I don't know...that's why I consider more than what is delivered to me by right OR left wing hysterics...and I certainly don't take what comes out of the White House at face value.....


Well, okay. Please allow me to re-phrase: what do you believe to be the truth of 9/11?
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 10:26 am
I believe the government turned a blind eye to the signs and murmurs...and then parlayed lemons into lemonade to go to a war of revenge and profit that they would have found an excuse to do eventually anyway.....I do not believe our top leaders..both the ones we're told are our leaders and the Wizards behind the curtain...give one flying f*#k for American citizens, world citizens or anything other than the total harvest of our remaining global resources......and I do not think our leaders are unique in the world......
0 Replies
 
ForeverYoung
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 10:29 am
Thank you, Bear.

That's exactly why I was interested in why there is no "ICONOCLAST" user group here ...... :wink:
0 Replies
 
Rafick
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 10:58 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
I believe the government turned a blind eye to the signs and murmurs...and then parlayed lemons into lemonade to go to a war of revenge and profit that they would have found an excuse to do eventually anyway.....I do not believe our top leaders..both the ones we're told are our leaders and the Wizards behind the curtain...give one flying f*#k for American citizens, world citizens or anything other than the total harvest of our remaining global resources......and I do not think our leaders are unique in the world......


Thanx Bi-Polar Bear, for once i agree Surprised

http://www.geocities.com/pearly7000/bush/toon-wag.jpg
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 11:02 am
ForeverYoung wrote:
... I was interested in why there is no "ICONOCLAST" user group here ...... :wink:


We ain't real big on vandals hereabouts, whatever they call themselves :wink:
0 Replies
 
ForeverYoung
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 11:04 am
timberlandko wrote:
We ain't real big on vandals hereabouts, whatever they call themselves :wink:


Embarrassed

My ignorance is showing again. I don't 'get' that. Please break it down for me.

Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 11:24 am
ForeverYoung wrote:
I don't 'get' that. Please break it down for me.


Gladly:

ICONOCLAST : One who destroys images and/or other artifacts

From the Greek "Eikonoklastes", breaker of icons
0 Replies
 
Rafick
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 11:27 am
The 9/11 Evidence that May Hang George W. Bush
I found this Article, I just wana know what you guys think.

The 9/11 Evidence that May Hang George W. Bush

http://scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0206/S00071.htm

I have nothing to do with this Article by the way, its By Cheryl Seal
0 Replies
 
Einherjar
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 11:27 am
ForeverYoung wrote:
timberlandko wrote:
We ain't real big on vandals hereabouts, whatever they call themselves :wink:


Embarrassed

My ignorance is showing again. I don't 'get' that. Please break it down for me.

Embarrassed


Iconoclast used to mean people (Christians) with a passion for destroying "depictions of false gods" or "forbidden depictions of heavenly things". Such people vandalized museums, old churches, and the holy sites of other religions.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 11:29 am
Re: The 9/11 Evidence that May Hang George W. Bush
Rafick wrote:
I just wana know what you guys think.


I think P. T. Barnum was a very perceptive guy.
0 Replies
 
Rafick
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 11:32 am
can you belive it
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/graphics/bush_dailymirror_dumb_people.jpg
0 Replies
 
Rafick
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 11:39 am
Re: The 9/11 Evidence that May Hang George W. Bush
timberlandko wrote:
Rafick wrote:
I just wana know what you guys think.


I think P. T. Barnum was a very perceptive guy.


Do you mean P.T.(Exploitation) Barnum, ha ha ha Laughing
0 Replies
 
CoastalRat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2004 12:02 pm
I think the article is a bunch of suppositions based on falsehoods. Same old thing from someone who hates Bush. Where did info come that led the writer to state that once a president's approval rating hits 45% impeachment soon follows? Oh, I guess she made that one up. And then she follows with the same old tired story that Bush stole the 2000 election. Oh yeah, somehow following the path that will best benefit himself is seen as somehow evil. Give me a break. Everyone here will follow a path in life for which they deem best for the benefit of themselves.

Based on all this, she concludes that Bush would stand aside and let 9/11 happen. Right. Rafick, if this is how you form your opinions, I am understanding you a little better now.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/24/2025 at 08:36:44