0
   

Diversity of Everything but Thought

 
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2005 08:42 pm
Honey pie
I'm in love
but I'm lazy
you are driving
me crazy.
sent recipes.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2005 08:45 pm
Howdy, stretch.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2005 08:46 pm
blatham wrote:
Quote:
First of all the people at the fair agreed to have pies thrown at them and the speakers at schools did not. You are speaking about apples and oranges.

I make the point of magnitude. Tico earlier brought up the notion that this act is a crime. As if that settles very much at all. So is speeding. We'll assume Tico has been guilty of this. Perhaps fudging on his tax return. We'll assume you have rolled through a stop sign on some dark and abandoned road once or twice. So let's toss you and Tico in jail too, you fascist bastards. Either of you ever slugged someone? Of course, a ceam pie is way way more injurious than a driven fist.

Quote:
It's fine that you don't mind pies being thrown at people, but that doesn't mean others have to like it. It's a difference of opinion. I know if it were I, I would want those little fascist bastards thrown in jail.


My speeding and stop sign roll thorough don't hurt people right to free speech. I'm not doing anything to them so your augment us moot. I understand you have to stand up for these little dweebs but can you at least keep this debate in the realm of reality.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2005 08:50 pm
"but can you at least keep this debate in the realm of reality."
I am quite sure Blatham could do that, but he is conditioned to respond in-kind to the other posters here. However, that's not an unreasonable request baldimo.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2005 09:19 pm
I'll post this here and on one other relevant thread.

The sorts of claims that get made, then forwarded by a lot of the folks here and elsewhere on this topic are commonly marked by sloppy thinking, worse research, and in a lot of cases, outright lies.

Let's take, for example, Robert Novak's claim on Crossfire yesterday that...
Quote:
"[t]hey only have left-wing speakers on campuses like Berkeley and Harvard."


A lot of the folks on this thread will just gobble that down and repeat it. There are already a ton of examples preceding.

What's true? A year earlier, on April 8, 2004, Novak himself spoke at Harvard University's Institute of Politics.

What else is true? A partial speaker list...

- Former executive director of the Christian Coalition and Southeast regional chairman for the Bush-Cheney '04 campaign Ralph Reed (Harvard, 3/23/05)
-Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith (Harvard, 3/3/05)
-U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (Harvard, 9/28/04)
-Former U.S. Education Secretary Rod Paige (Harvard, 4/22/04)
-Bush-Cheney '04 campaign manager Ken Mehlman (Harvard, 4/13/04)
-Former Club for Growth president Stephen Moore (Harvard, 3/11/04)
-Students for Academic Freedom president David Horowitz (UC Berkeley, 2/3/05)
-Former U.S. Senate candidate Bill Jones (UC Berkeley, 10/6/04)
-Weekly Standard editor William Kristol (UC Berkeley, 10/4/04)
-Conservative columnist and author Michelle Malkin (UC Berkeley, 9/7/04)
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2005 09:29 pm
blatham wrote:
Lash wrote:
Conservatives don't throw pies.

They just vote, and go back to work.

The liberals must have too much spare time. Maybe they should use all that leisure to come up with a reason to exist, or something.


Ya figure? Three pie targets:

- A Liberal Prime Minister
- San Franciso mayor Gavin Newsom
- Sierra Club president


Not so fast, Quick Draw!

A PM? Not in America.
The Gay Mayor of Gaytown USA? An anti-gay pie, which (no matter how desperately you'd like) cannot be equated with conservatives. Anti-gay pie!
Sierra Club President, you say??? Likely the FBI, as the Sierra Club is a well known terrorist organization.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2005 11:41 pm
<scratches head>

You OK Lash?
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Apr, 2005 12:05 am
ehBeth wrote:
Baldimo wrote:
I know if it were I, I would want those little fascist bastards thrown in jail.


and what should be done with conservative pie-throwers?


This is what I just luv about conservatives. They are so kind hearted and non-punitive. Laid back lovers of life with excellent senses of humor.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Apr, 2005 12:17 am
I think Horowitz and the conservatives on this board got the message loud and clear. The pie throwing has apparently served it's purpose. College students do not like ingratiating advise from ex-radical hippie turn coats. The message was clear........"go home, Horowitz, we don't need you telling us what to do."

The self righteous meddling of today's conservatives will be met with resistance. Must they learn the hard way once again? If so, this will be fun.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Apr, 2005 07:36 am
Cluster bombs - practical implements enroute to freedom.

Cream pies - seriously criminal, terrorist weaponry
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Apr, 2005 08:49 am
Well maybe Americans have a stronger sense of manners, courtesy, sense of fair play, and appreciation for free speech than do Canadians. Who knows? I would suspect if you were invited to address any group, had prepared your remarks, and were in the process of delivering them when hit by a thrown pie, you would not feel like that was funny or appropriate or anything other than assault and battery.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Apr, 2005 12:07 pm
Sheesh, if I had known the furor that would have been caused by posting the Al-Pieda attack....

I would have posted it earlier!

If I were hit by a pie, I would laugh it off! This idiocy about 'disrespect' and 'criminal acts' is absolutely ridiculous. Get a sense of humor, people!!!!

Look to the behaviour of Nader if you want to see how a real man acts under this sort of attack:

Quote:
Mayoral candidate Matt Gonzalez and past and possible future presidential hopeful Nader spoke in support of fellow Green Party member Camejo, who took just over 5 percent in the election last November. Nader took a pie in the face just after lecturing the press on their role in not turning the state recall into a media circus.

Nader hurled the pie back, striking a bystander.


If you get hit with a pie, and laugh it off, your stock goes up something like a thousand percent with your audience; if you huff and puff and get angry, you look like a fool and a blowhard.

It's not surprising to me at all that some of the conservatives on here can't understand this in the slightest.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 08:04 am
blatham wrote:
Quote:
First of all the people at the fair agreed to have pies thrown at them and the speakers at schools did not. You are speaking about apples and oranges.

I make the point of magnitude. Tico earlier brought up the notion that this act is a crime. As if that settles very much at all. So is speeding. We'll assume Tico has been guilty of this. Perhaps fudging on his tax return. We'll assume you have rolled through a stop sign on some dark and abandoned road once or twice. So let's toss you and Tico in jail too, you fascist bastards. Either of you ever slugged someone? Of course, a ceam pie is way way more injurious than a driven fist.


Battery is a misdemeanor crime; Speeding is a traffic infraction - I think my last such ticket was well over 10 years ago ... youthful indiscretion. And no, I don't "fudge" on my tax return, and I've never struck someone when not defending myself or someone else. Please stop projecting your criminal tendencies onto me.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 08:43 am
Ticomaya wrote:
...Speeding is a traffic infraction - I think my last such ticket was well over 10 years ago ... youthful indiscretion...

A few points:

1) Are you claiming not to have exceeded the speed limit at any time in the last 10 years? As others have mentioned, being caught is not the measure of whether a crime was committed.
2) Youthful indiscretion? How old do you think these pie-throwers are? I fail to see how you can excuse your own actions by this method and still hold them accountable for theirs.
3) You have inadvertently scored a point for the other side when you point out the relative severity of these illegal acts. I maintain that a pie in the face, when no one is injured, is not a serious crime, no matter what statute one could charge the pie-er under.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 08:45 am
Of course, I didn't say anything about when your last ticket was received, but rather, the last time one was deserved (legally) because you were over the speed limit or you didn't fully stop at a stop sign, or briefly parked where you shouldn't or proceded through a yellow light.

But at least you manage to acknowledge the rather important aspect of magnitude of legal infractions.

The next step would be something akin to common sense...like considering which of the following two infractions might produce a consequence such as crippling or face-disfigurement:
- speeding in a two ton hunk of iron
- throwing a cream pie
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 08:46 am
DD...perhaps we are the same person
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 08:59 am
DrewDad wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
...Speeding is a traffic infraction - I think my last such ticket was well over 10 years ago ... youthful indiscretion...

A few points:

1) Are you claiming not to have exceeded the speed limit at any time in the last 10 years? As others have mentioned, being caught is not the measure of whether a crime was committed.
2) Youthful indiscretion? How old do you think these pie-throwers are? I fail to see how you can excuse your own actions by this method and still hold them accountable for theirs.
3) You have inadvertently scored a point for the other side when you point out the relative severity of these illegal acts. I maintain that a pie in the face, when no one is injured, is not a serious crime, no matter what statute one could charge the pie-er under.


1) Did I say that? I regularly exceed the posted speed limits - by a few MPH. Again, not a crime .. a traffic infraction.

2) What has the fact that I referred to my last speeding ticket as a "youthful indiscretion" have to do with pie throwing? The fact that I was young has little to do with excuse or justification, and a lot to do with explanation. The acts of the pie throwers are immature, so it is no surprise they are youthful. But the fact of their youth does not excuse their actions.

3) I have never claimed a pie in the face to be a "serious" crime ... but have maintained it is a crime ... a misdemeanor battery. It remains so, regardless of your sense of its seriousness, or lack thereof. It remains so, in contrast to a traffic infraction, which is not a crime.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 09:02 am
LOL.

Perhaps, but then again some posts just write themselves....
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 09:13 am
The most remarkable thing about this exchange is the liberalmaniacs who are actually defending the pie throwers and see nothing at all wrong with that. But most of the same people take strong exception to any conservative who utters the slightest spoken nuance or gesture that is not 100% politically correct. Isn't it funny that an offhand remark is a big deal but physical battery is not?
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 09:15 am
Ticomaya wrote:
DrewDad wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
...Speeding is a traffic infraction - I think my last such ticket was well over 10 years ago ... youthful indiscretion...

A few points:

1) Are you claiming not to have exceeded the speed limit at any time in the last 10 years? As others have mentioned, being caught is not the measure of whether a crime was committed.
2) Youthful indiscretion? How old do you think these pie-throwers are? I fail to see how you can excuse your own actions by this method and still hold them accountable for theirs.
3) You have inadvertently scored a point for the other side when you point out the relative severity of these illegal acts. I maintain that a pie in the face, when no one is injured, is not a serious crime, no matter what statute one could charge the pie-er under.


1) Did I say that? I regularly exceed the posted speed limits - by a few MPH. Again, not a crime .. a traffic infraction.

2) What has the fact that I referred to my last speeding ticket as a "youthful indiscretion" have to do with pie throwing? The fact that I was young has little to do with excuse or justification, and a lot to do with explanation. The acts of the pie throwers are immature, so it is no surprise they are youthful. But the fact of their youth does not excuse their actions.

3) I have never claimed a pie in the face to be a "serious" crime ... but have maintained it is a crime ... a misdemeanor battery. It remains so, regardless of your sense of its seriousness, or lack thereof. It remains so, in contrast to a traffic infraction, which is not a crime.

Ah! You are being pedantic! OK. I'm guilty of that on occasion, too. I thought you were actually trying to make a point.

To recap: Assaulting someone with a pie is "just" a misdemeanor. Your habitual speeding is "just" a traffic infraction. Is that about right?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 07/21/2025 at 07:56:45